cthia wrote:On Grayson there are rules about fairness! Fairness is innate, inherent. Inseparable. Fairness is part and parcel to their beliefs. Their morals. Their scruples. Their values. It is indivisible as a part of their faith. At the heart of Grayson's faith is Grayson's God. There is nothing unfair about the tenets of God, in any faith! Interjecting unfairness upon the duels on Grayson is enough to bring the house down. To do so would spit on the very sanctity of what is just. To do so would embarrass the Graysons in the eyes of Tester. To do so would eliminate faith that God will judge. Abandoning fairness would signal a complete departure from faith and trust in God. At the very worst, it may cause many to question their religious beliefs. Proof positive of the importance and fear predicated on Star Trek's Prime Directive.
Jonathan_S wrote:A ruler classically chooses their very best warrior to be their champion. The intent is to discourage excessive numbers of challenges and to win the ones that are brought. I have a hard time believing that Grayson would be so committed to fairness in trial by combat as to require (or at least to have a public norm for) the Protector to have a champion that is evenly matched with challengers.
At the heart of the matter, it isn't Grayson that is committed to fairness. The God that they serve is committed to fairness. Fairness is inherent in righteousness. You can't claim one without the other. So, to allege that oneself follows God is to also accept the minimum requirement of righteousness.
No, Grayson doesn't require their Champion to be evenly matched. Of course not! The Protector can justifiably solicit Clark Kent as his Champion if he so chooses. But the Protector,
by all that is righteous, should divulge to the People that his People's Champion, is none other than the Man of Steel. I'm pretty damn sure that that will quite admirably suffice to discourage challengers. Challengers courting battle at that point are responsible for their
own suicidal tendencies or either he has faith far greater than a mustard seed. At any rate, it won't be left up in the air and open to be blamed on something unrighteous and seedy. It is the same notion that an accomplished martial artist has to divulge his capabilities before maiming or killing. Why is it that legally, either of my sisters have to divulge her secret to a man that she is accomplished in hand to hand combat? She is already naturally disadvantaged.
It is because the law also has an obligation to protect the foolish. You can't put an electric fence inside your perimeter without warning people. You can't place booby-traps inside your home without being culpable to the death of an intruder in your own home. They may be confused and in their wrong mind. Same notion at play, except exacerbated by the additional righteous requirements expected by a God. But I digress.
Jonathan_S wrote:And for all these claims of fairness Burdette certainly didn't expect this to be a fair fight. He expected his long training and practice with the sword to let him cut down the novice, Honor, should she be foolish enough to not yield (and thereby grant him victory)
Burdette certainly
did expect it to be a fair fight. You are confusing your sympathy for Honor's physical injuries and the fact that she was emotionally and physically exhausted with unfairness. None of that had any bearing on Burdette's right to challenge - thus
his fairness in doing so. That is why Benjamin knew he had to either capitulate or concede. It was fair under the rules of the duel for Burdette to challenge. And it should have been fair. Fairness is inherent in a system of religious beliefs. Burdette was right to assume a certain level of compliance to what is expected from a follower of Tester. Above all, Burdette expected the duel
to be conducted righteously. And it should have been.
Jonathan_S wrote:Why is it such an outrage that Honor did not specifically stop to disclose her enhanced musculature and quicker than average reactions[1] but it wasn't an outrage that a master of the sword challenged a novice to a duel to the death!!
You are attempting to mix water with oil, which will separate itself every time.
Let me make this clear. Honor's mistake isn't against man. It is against God. Honor introduced scandal into an equation that God orchestrated to be cut and dry. Tester can be made to look guilty by association.
Jonathan_S wrote:Where are these rules enforcing fairness here? If a fair trial was mandatory why isn't Benjamin allowed/required to pick a champion matching the skill and training (or lack thereof) of each challenger?
They are inherent in the tenets of the Book of The New Way. There are two distinctly different concepts being bandied about without understanding.
1. Unfairness to man.
2. Unfairness to God and his teachings. Unfairness to right and wrong.
Jonathan_S wrote:Or is the contest allowed to be as unfair as a participant likes as long as they announce any and all perceived advantages before using them to win? In that case why isn't that mutual announcement of advantages a formal part of Grayson challenges?
As far as the crease, Honor can read minds. Her ability is way-out of the norm. She is the lone benefactor of this ability. It would be righteous that Kara Danvers inform her challenger that he is facing the Woman of Steel.
Jonathan_S wrote:Even the remaining conservative steadholders, who picked on almost anything Honor did in their continued attempts to hold tightly to Grayson's historic practices do not appear to have claimed that she behaved incorrectly, duplicitously, or unrighteously in her duel with Burdette. Given that they were seizing on anything they could to discredit her it seems inconceivable to me that, if her actions were as antithetical to Grayson mores as you say, they wouldn't have made that a major point of their campaign to discredit her!
Because Honor's ability is a secret that is unknown to the galaxy. How could they use it against her when they aren't privy to it? Even Eloise made a lighthearted comment about Honor's ability. . .
Paraphrasing: "You little slew-footed bitch. No wonder you practice diplomacy head over heels above the rest."
Paraphrasing off: "You were cheating!"
Even Eloise recognizes it as cheating. Surely many paranoid people on Grayson can be made to sympathize with it in this case as well.
Jonathan_S wrote:It looks, to me, like Grayson practices don't match what you feel they would have to be.
You mean righteous?
Jonathan_S wrote:[1] She couldn't have disclosed her telempathic ability as she didn't yet realize that she had that - outside of the link to Nimitz. It would be years before she realized that she was becoming able to read human emotions directly
Her conduit, Nimitz, was sitting there watching. You can rest assured that Nimitz detected Burdette's crease instantly. His life was on the line too. Which is why I said Honor should have removed Nimitz from the equation. God doesn't need controversy, uncertainty or conflict tainting his plans and painting his canvass.
These are the possible
cards Harrington's actions deals the Opposition. The Protector may have inadvertently stacked the deck against himself and tainted Tester's truth.