Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 25 guests

Spider drive ships and technical limitations

Join us in talking discussing all things Honor, including (but not limited to) tactics, favorite characters, and book discussions.
Re: Spider drive ships and technical limitations
Post by Joat42   » Tue Aug 28, 2018 4:23 pm

Joat42
Admiral

Posts: 2162
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2013 7:01 am
Location: Sweden

Loren Pechtel wrote:
kzt wrote:R^2 kills you. You have to know where it is to get enough energy back to find it. And the return is light speed, so at a light minute you low where it was a minute ago and you missiles will take x minutes to get there, so no, not going to work.


I wouldn't consider it an impossible tactic.

Yes, in a ship to ship engagement r^2 makes it utterly useless. However, consider the Mistletoe system. While it's not going to do any good here lets look at something along these lines:

Take an Apollo pod. Half the birds are simply big booms--no rods, no targeting systems. The other half of the pod is pure sensor, no boom, no targeting. The control missile has some software changes.

You realize there's an enemy ship hiding--you know it's approximate location but not good enough to actually put rods on target. The first pod you fire is this special pod, the rest of the missiles are a bit behind.

When the birds reach the area the booms start going off. The guys hiding are going to have a very hard time maintaining stealth against the sensor birds--and when their location is revealed the attack birds are not far behind, they don't have time to slip away.

Of course the probe missiles are sitting ducks--but if the defenders fire on them it's the same thing--they just revealed their location.

Although I thought it up I'm ambivalent if it's practical. The tech is all there - it just need to be put together with some software added to handle it.

I'm guessing that what the Demonic Duo will come up with is probably some kind of extremely sensitive gravatic arrays that can measure the distortion ships make on the fabric of space.

---
Jack of all trades and destructive tinkerer.


Anyone who have simple solutions for complex problems is a fool.
Top
Re: Spider drive ships and technical limitations
Post by runsforcelery   » Tue Aug 28, 2018 4:37 pm

runsforcelery
First Space Lord

Posts: 2425
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 11:39 am
Location: South Carolina

Vince wrote:
Louis R wrote:Second, if you're going to go to the trouble of installing a massive set of alpha nodes in the first place, I wouldn't think that it would be a huge extra effort to install a compensator to go with them. And if you've done that, the whole problem goes away.


No wedge = no compensator, period.

Consider the battle of Cerberus. While Honor was sneaking in on thrusters she could not use her compensators despite having every bit of hardware required.


Loren Pechtel wrote:Delete the period and add an alternative. In the Honorverse, if you are in hyperspace (or are transiting a wormhole) and are in a gravity wave, and have raised Warshawski sails, the gravity wave acts as a much more powerful gravity sump for the inertial compensator to dump felt acceleration into:
More Than Honor, The Universe of Honor Harrington, (1) Background (General) wrote:Then, in 1384 pd, a physicist by the name of Shigematsu Radhakrishnan added another major breakthrough in the form of the inertial compensator. The compensator turned the grav wave (natural or artificial) associated with a vessel into a sort of "inertial sump," dumping the inertial forces of acceleration into the grav wave and thus exempting the vessel's crew from the g forces associated with acceleration. Within the limits of its efficiency, it completely eliminated g force, placing an accelerating vessel in a permanent state of internal zero-gee, but its capacity to damp inertia was directly proportional to the power of the grav wave around it and inversely proportional to both the volume of the field and the mass of the vessel about which it was generated. The first factor meant that it was far more effective for starships than for sublight ships, as the former drew upon the greater energy of the naturally occurring grav waves of hyper-space, and the second meant it was more effective for smaller ships than for larger ones. The natural grav waves of hyper-space, with their incomparably greater power, offered a much "deeper" sump than the artificial stress bands of the impeller drive, which meant that a Warshawski Sail ship could deflect vastly more g force from its passengers than one under impeller drive. In general terms, the compensator permitted humans to endure acceleration rates approaching 550 g under impeller drive and 4-5,000 g under sail, which allows hyperships to make up "bleed-off" velocity very quickly after translation. These numbers are for military compensators, which tend to be more massive, more energy and maintenance intensive, and much more expensive than those used in most merchant construction. Military compensators allow higher acceleration—and warships cannot afford to be less maneuverable than their foes—but only at the cost of penalties merchant ships as a whole cannot afford.
Italics are the author's, boldface and underlined text is my emphasis.




Gosh. You went back and actually read the rule book. Have you no shame?! :twisted: :twisted:


"Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as Piglet came back from the dead.
Top
Re: Spider drive ships and technical limitations
Post by Galactic Sapper   » Tue Aug 28, 2018 4:45 pm

Galactic Sapper
Captain of the List

Posts: 524
Joined: Mon Aug 27, 2018 1:11 pm

noblehunter wrote:Maybe they can even get close enough to use a

If they could get THAT close without being detected they could simply cross your T and use the spider to rip the front end off your ship.

Jonathan_S wrote:But with a LennyDet on emergency boost having something like 1/4 the acceleration of an Manticoran SD(P), and 1/33rd the accel of a Ghost Rider recon drone, providing even an approximate locus might be enough to get yourself hunted down and cornered. (Unless the ambush is from outside the hyper limit, in which case you can slip away before any response can pin you down)


I would think flooding the launch locus with recon drones would be better in most cases, since they could establish and maintain contact with the spider ship. Only in a situation where you can't get recon drones to the locus in under 10 minutes or so would using Apollo in a remote sensing role make sense. That assumes that you can get not just a locus but a velocity vector on the spider ship when it launches, since it won't be able to change directions enough in that time frame to get out of the range at which a recon drone could detect the spider (take that with a grain of salt, since those are just estimates based on very little hard data).
Top
Re: Spider drive ships and technical limitations
Post by ldwechsler   » Tue Aug 28, 2018 4:57 pm

ldwechsler
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1235
Joined: Sun May 28, 2017 12:15 pm

Joat42 wrote:
Loren Pechtel wrote:R^2 kills you. You have to know where it is to get enough energy back to find it. And the return is light speed, so at a light minute you low where it was a minute ago and you missiles will take x minutes to get there, so no, not going to work.


I wouldn't consider it an impossible tactic.

Yes, in a ship to ship engagement r^2 makes it utterly useless. However, consider the Mistletoe system. While it's not going to do any good here lets look at something along these lines:

Take an Apollo pod. Half the birds are simply big booms--no rods, no targeting systems. The other half of the pod is pure sensor, no boom, no targeting. The control missile has some software changes.

You realize there's an enemy ship hiding--you know it's approximate location but not good enough to actually put rods on target. The first pod you fire is this special pod, the rest of the missiles are a bit behind.

When the birds reach the area the booms start going off. The guys hiding are going to have a very hard time maintaining stealth against the sensor birds--and when their location is revealed the attack birds are not far behind, they don't have time to slip away.

Of course the probe missiles are sitting ducks--but if the defenders fire on them it's the same thing--they just revealed their location.

Although I thought it up I'm ambivalent if it's practical. The tech is all there - it just need to be put together with some software added to handle it.

I'm guessing that what the Demonic Duo will come up with is probably some kind of extremely sensitive gravatic arrays that can measure the distortion ships make on the fabric of space.[/quote]

At a few places in text, it's been mentioned that traces of the spider drives have been found. Top techs should be able to figure out how to track the ships. Yes, it will take some time but when much of the tracking tech is not unwieldy it can be done fairly readily.

If regular ships can pick up traces, then there will be enough clues to figure out how to really do a good job.

And remember that MAlign has to worry that if any ships are captured, everyone will become aware of Darius.

Remember that Haven used separate pilots to bring ships from Bolthole. They never got near the action. Darius is a key element in MAlign. They can't hide it that well.
Top
Re: Spider drive ships and technical limitations
Post by Vince   » Tue Aug 28, 2018 5:02 pm

Vince
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1574
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 11:43 pm

runsforcelery wrote:Gosh. You went back and actually read the rule book. Have you no shame?! :twisted: :twisted:

Actually, I was the one pointing out to Loren Pechtel the relevant section in the rule book. I think you got confused when you edited the quotes for your reply to meet the embedded quote limit on the site.

Here's my original reply to Loren Pechtel:
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=9682&start=19
-------------------------------------------------------------
History does not repeat itself so much as it echoes.
Top
Re: Spider drive ships and technical limitations
Post by Joat42   » Tue Aug 28, 2018 5:22 pm

Joat42
Admiral

Posts: 2162
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2013 7:01 am
Location: Sweden

ldwechsler wrote:..snip..
And remember that MAlign has to worry that if any ships are captured, everyone will become aware of Darius.

Remember that Haven used separate pilots to bring ships from Bolthole. They never got near the action. Darius is a key element in MAlign. They can't hide it that well.

The MA has the nanotech to stop their crew leaking any information.

But I have been thinking, the nanotech isn't fool proof - there is one way to debrief MA personnel but it's a bitch to set up even when all the conditions align perfectly.

---
Jack of all trades and destructive tinkerer.


Anyone who have simple solutions for complex problems is a fool.
Top
Re: Spider drive ships and technical limitations
Post by munroburton   » Tue Aug 28, 2018 5:31 pm

munroburton
Admiral

Posts: 2375
Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2013 10:16 am
Location: Scotland

Thanks for that. I was wondering if I'd missed something about ships under warshawski sails not being compensated.

So do spider ships under sail have use of compensators? I realise it doesn't provide much combat or strategical benefits, but would be interesting to know.

Vince wrote:Delete the period and add an alternative. In the Honorverse, if you are in hyperspace (or are transiting a wormhole) and are in a gravity wave, and have raised Warshawski sails, the gravity wave acts as a much more powerful gravity sump for the inertial compensator to dump felt acceleration into:
More Than Honor, The Universe of Honor Harrington, (1) Background (General) wrote:Then, in 1384 pd, a physicist by the name of Shigematsu Radhakrishnan added another major breakthrough in the form of the inertial compensator. The compensator turned the grav wave (natural or artificial) associated with a vessel into a sort of "inertial sump," dumping the inertial forces of acceleration into the grav wave and thus exempting the vessel's crew from the g forces associated with acceleration. Within the limits of its efficiency, it completely eliminated g force, placing an accelerating vessel in a permanent state of internal zero-gee, but its capacity to damp inertia was directly proportional to the power of the grav wave around it and inversely proportional to both the volume of the field and the mass of the vessel about which it was generated. The first factor meant that it was far more effective for starships than for sublight ships, as the former drew upon the greater energy of the naturally occurring grav waves of hyper-space, and the second meant it was more effective for smaller ships than for larger ones. The natural grav waves of hyper-space, with their incomparably greater power, offered a much "deeper" sump than the artificial stress bands of the impeller drive, which meant that a Warshawski Sail ship could deflect vastly more g force from its passengers than one under impeller drive. In general terms, the compensator permitted humans to endure acceleration rates approaching 550 g under impeller drive and 4-5,000 g under sail, which allows hyperships to make up "bleed-off" velocity very quickly after translation. These numbers are for military compensators, which tend to be more massive, more energy and maintenance intensive, and much more expensive than those used in most merchant construction. Military compensators allow higher acceleration—and warships cannot afford to be less maneuverable than their foes—but only at the cost of penalties merchant ships as a whole cannot afford.
Italics are the author's, boldface and underlined text is my emphasis.
Top
Re: Spider drive ships and technical limitations
Post by kzt   » Tue Aug 28, 2018 6:31 pm

kzt
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 11360
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 8:18 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

Loren Pechtel wrote:
When the birds reach the area the booms start going off. The guys hiding are going to have a very hard time maintaining stealth against the sensor birds--and when their location is revealed the attack birds are not far behind, they don't have time to slip away.

Of course the probe missiles are sitting ducks--but if the defenders fire on them it's the same thing--they just revealed their location.

And when the cleverly prepositioned CM's kill them?
Top
Re: Spider drive ships and technical limitations
Post by Jonathan_S   » Tue Aug 28, 2018 9:36 pm

Jonathan_S
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 8793
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 2:01 pm
Location: Virginia, USA

munroburton wrote:Thanks for that. I was wondering if I'd missed something about ships under warshawski sails not being compensated.

So do spider ships under sail have use of compensators? I realise it doesn't provide much combat or strategical benefits, but would be interesting to know.
Presumably they could.
If we assume that using grav plates, in a non-emergency, they wouldn't boost at more than 100 gees it would take them about 51 hours to reach the 0.6 max rad shielding speed for hyper.

If we assume the compesator could normally safely provide even 25 gees for a ship/wedge that size and under sail in a wave you get about 10x that. With 2.5x the acceleration of the grav plates you could reach top speed in just over 20 hours. Is saving a day or two at most on transits strategically worth it? Enough to offset the expense, volume, and maintenance time it's take to have one?


Hard to say, especially since we don't really know what those costs and tradeoffs are.
Top
Re: Spider drive ships and technical limitations
Post by runsforcelery   » Tue Aug 28, 2018 9:59 pm

runsforcelery
First Space Lord

Posts: 2425
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 11:39 am
Location: South Carolina

Vince wrote:
runsforcelery wrote:Gosh. You went back and actually read the rule book. Have you no shame?! :twisted: :twisted:

Actually, I was the one pointing out to Loren Pechtel the relevant section in the rule book. I think you got confused when you edited the quotes for your reply to meet the embedded quote limit on the site.

Here's my original reply to Loren Pechtel:
viewtopic.php?f=1&t=9682&start=19



Probably. Been doing a lot of un-embedding lately. :lol:


"Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as Piglet came back from the dead.
Top

Return to Honorverse