cthia wrote:The GA is obviously showing restraint
after the war too. No reparations? I don't expect the SEM to demand all of the reparations owed them, but none at all? The GA, particularly the SEM, has been letting the League off the hook from the get go, even when they were too arrogant to appreciate it. I suppose it wouldn't be fitting to hold the entire League responsible for the atrocious shenanigans of a few misfits. Or even Sol. But there's a lot of money in the League. You seen their piggybank?
The Mandarins, who are responsible for such atrocities against the SEM, have huge bank accounts themselves. At least those accounts and properties should be seized and awarded to the SEM. At the very least, the families of those destroyers should be compensated. They have a right to sue the Mandarins themselves, in a separate civil suit of murder. I suppose it
is a nice consolation that after the trial they will be executed on Manticore with the bereaving families watching and popping grapes.
I don't agree with the court being a joint GA-SL court. I suppose I should at least prepare myself for the same kind of gridlock which arose in the supposedly open and shut case of Pavel Young.
Perhaps if they had a large enough debt to worry about they can't be too quick to spend it on planning more immoral and illegal acts of war. And somehow, all of the post war restraint wreaks of too much deference in my book. But then, I felt the same thing about the Harrington plan itself, which was inevitably tossed out the window -- by Harrington. However, OTOH, the miscreants who would immediately feel that the SEM is too weak to punish them are being relieved of their heads and thus their thinking. Point!
One concern I do have is whether the GA will monitor the government to make sure it doesn't default back into their same old habits of using FF as an iron fist to extort their own members and squeeze blood out of turnips.
****** *
I must admit total unfamiliarity with the
Battle of Verdun. What a
picturesque city after reading the wiki. This war could be turned into a Hollywood blockbuster. I spent over an hour enthralled by this war.
Is there truly no end of repulsive wars on Earth.
I'm sorry, that was supposed to be an anti-
Versailles. It was late, I was using voice recognition, and I proofread what I expected to see when I misspoke.
And, no, there aren't going to be any reparation demands. Not from the Grand Alliance, anyway. That doesn't mean the places they got hammered in Buccaneer aren't going to be rebuilt on the Solarian dime, but that's a different matter. In fact,
that is covered by existing Solarian law where Eridani Edict violations are concerned. The systems that were hit can (and will) bring suit in Solarian courts to recover
all damages inflicted by the Solarian League Navy in the course of that series of operations. Some of those systems — like Hypatia — may have become member systems of the Star Empire of Manticore, for example, and thus be a part of the Grand Alliance. They will be bringing suit as individual star systems, however, following well-established jurisprudence in the League.
The personal fortunes of the Mandarins may, indeed, be forfeited to the Grand Alliance. That's another matter, and one that needs to be worked out between the League Department of Justice and the Grand Alliance. The imposition of massive fines to be paid to the victims of their actions would be a matter of civil liability, however.
I'm sorry you don't agree with the notion of joint courts. And I don't know why you should prepare yourself for the "same kind of gridlock which arose in the supposedly open and shut case of Pavel Young." In Pavel Young's case, the verdict was hung because of purely domestic political factionalism. This would be far more like the courts-martial on Cerberus, where there really weren't any "hung" juries. And I didn't say that the Solarian League and the Grand Alliance would have equal representation on the court. The most probable outcome is to impanel a court with representatives from each member state of the Grand Alliance; three from the Solarian League (nominated by the new League government but subject to approval by the Grand Alliance); and one from the Andermani (who were neutral) in the war between the Grand Alliance and the League. That would give us 3 Grand Alliance judges; 3 Solarian judges; and 1 Andermani judge, so there'd be no opportunity for a deadlocked judgment. The Andermani judge could be expected to be neutral but the leaning in the Grand Alliance's direction, but I can guarantee you that the Grand Alliance would be careful about overruling the 3 Sollies on a "straight party vote." Nor should they need to. Interstellar law is very clear on what constitutes a "war crime," and the only people for whom that law could be in the least ambiguous would be the Mandarins themselves, who were exercising the executive power of a sovereign star nation but were not themselves elected officeholders in that star nation's
official governing structure. Again, however, Solarian law on Eridani Edict violations comes into play, and it would be flat out impossible to find 3 genuinely honest Solarian judges who wouldn't convict as soon as the evidence is laid before them.
Now, I can already hear somebody saying "But there
aren't any
honest Solarian judges!" In fact, there are
tons of honest Solarian judges; they live in systems like Beowulf (although Beowulf itself will no longer be a Solarian system) where the
system (i.e., "state") judiciaries were untainted by the corruption at the Federal level. (Remember, for example, Beowulf's attitude toward the SLN's demand to transit the Beowulf Terminus as part of Raging Justice.) One thing that needs to be borne in mind here, although I don't know that I ever specifically said so anywhere in the books, is that under the original League constitution, federal law overrode local law only in certain special, very carefully delineated areas. That was intended to protect the member systems, but, perversely, actually became a factor in the corrupting of the
federal judiciary. Because the full member systems had very few dogs in the fight where federal jurisprudence was concerned, those member systems were far less vigilant about ensuring honesty and integrity at the federal level. Even with that . . . disconnect, the federal courts didn't go over to the dark side of the force overnight, of course. Remember that what we are seeing by Honor's time is the result of seven centuries of evolution, and that the end product doesn't even remotely resemble — on the federal level — what the League's founders had envisioned.
The nominating process for Solarian judges would be one in which the League can nominate whoever it wants; the Grand Alliance can
reject any nominee it chooses to reject, for whatever reason; and the League gets to go on nominating until the process comes up with someone acceptable to both sides. Does anyone really think that with treecats in the room the League is going to be able to slide in someone who
isn't honest and prepared to approach his/her responsibilities with both moral and intellectual integrity? And that's what the Grand Alliance wants. They don't want kangaroo courts. They don't want a judicial process which will deliver simple
vengeance, no matter how satisfying that would be or how much solace the families of those killed in Beowulf or abused in the Protectorates would find in that sort of outcome. They want
justice, and they want the fact that it
was justice to be self-evident to anyone who later goes back and looks at the proceedings, if only for the reasons I touch on in my last two paragraphs, below.
People need to understand that the Star Kingdom of Manticore and, in particular, the House of Winton figured out a long time ago that it takes centuries to build an interstellar reputation for integrity, but that it can be destroyed by a single action. Eloise Pritchart understands that, as well, and in her case, there is a burning need to demonstrate that the resurrected Republic of Haven is
not, and will never again be, the
People's Republic of Haven. She understands how absolutely essential it is — both diplomatically and domestically — for the reborn Republic to live up to the ideals of the restored Péricard constitution. Not just in terms of rehabilitating it in the galaxy's eyes, but also in terms of rehabilitating itself in the eyes of its own citizens. Of giving them the opportunity to once again feel pride in its integrity and the respect for the rule of law it's displayed in dealing with such an emotionally charged set of trials. The Grand Alliance's entire stance vis-à-vis the League during the war was that it was the grown up in the room, that it was fighting not for territorial gain and not for the opportunity to extort "reparations," but in self-defense and in defense of the principle of self-determination in the Protectorates. It's absolutely true that championing self-determination in the Protectorates accomplished many vital things for the members of the Grand Alliance in both immediate "tactical" advantages during the war and long-term trading opportunities, after the war. But that didn't mean that Elizabeth Winton, Benjamin Mayhew, and Eloise Pritchart weren't genuinely committed to those ideals, if only because they recognized that in protecting that right of self-determination for
others, they were protecting it for
themselves and because they recognize the almost always
omitted parts of the famous quote from Machiavelli: "One ought to be
both feared
and loved, but as it is difficult for the two to go together, it is much safer to be feared than loved, if one
cannot be both." They are neither foolish enough to believe in some sort of galaxy wide kumbaya moment nor stupid enough to base their diplomacy and military policies on anything of the sort. But they not only have a genuine personal moral commitment to the concepts of self-determination and respect for interstellar law and the rules of war, they also recognize how enormously beneficial a reputation for that determination, solidly based on the actual defense of it even at the expense of blood and treasure, has to be in a post-Protectorate galaxy. Indeed, they only have to look at what happened after the "Mesan Atrocity" of Houdini's finale to see what it
cost them to have that reputation impugned. For that matter, the difference between the SKM and the
People's Republic's reputations and which of them the galaxy at large was more inclined to trust is another recent lesson in the same direction. (And, for that matter, it was the pre-Legislaturalist Republic's reputation for integrity and respect of law which made it
essential for the Alignment to remove it from play as the greatest single extra-Solarian threat to the Detweiler Plan's ultimate objectives.)
So there are all manner of pragmatic, moral, and ethical reasons for the Grand Alliance to proceed as transparently, as justly, and as
generously as it can in the aftermath of the war.
As for the last two points of your post, it would be really difficult to give the League "a large enough debt to worry about [that] they can't be too quick to spend it on planning more immoral and illegal acts of war." Unless the new League constitution repeats one of the fundamental errors of the
old league constitution, the federal government is going to be funded by taxation, not solely by regulatory fees, and that will give it access to fiscal resources the Mandarins could only dream about. Given that, it's impossible for me to conceive of a "large enough debt" that would seriously deter a revanchist League from planning whatever acts it thought would achieve the revenge it wanted. On the other hand, it's not at all difficult for me to imagine a reprise of the Treaty of Versailles' reparations that engendered enormous resentment and humiliation on the part of Germany, which was a major factor in some rather unfortunate repercussions twenty years later. The scale would be totally different, and it's unlikely the reparations would cripple the League's economy (or help to kick off a galaxywide Great Depression), but any attempt to inflict reparations that
could "cripple" the League would engender enormous resentment and hatred, with "unfortunate repercussions" of their own a few decades down the road. As Machiavelli also opined, "Never do any enemy a small injury, for they are like a snake which is half beaten and it will strike back the first chance it gets."
And about the possibility of the League "default[ing] back to their same old habits of using FF as an iron fist to extort their own members," even the Mandarins never did that, at least before they launched Buccaneer against Hypatia, at which point it could be argued that they crossed that particular red line. The Protectorates
weren't members of the League, which was why the federal government (or bureaucracies, at any rate) could get away with Frontier Security's policies and actions. I've used the example of the Belgian Congo as an analogy for the League's policy towards the Protectorates, because it's a good one from both ends. From the consequences for the exploited and the total obliviousness of the citizen-in-the-street in the League's core systems. The real reason the Mandarins and their predecessors got away with the Protectorates
is that the Solly-in-the-street neither knew nor cared what was happening there.And
that is what the Grand Alliance absolutely needs to drive home and make sure is never forgotten any more than the Holocaust can be forgotten by Germany and the world in general. The Allies can't make the League disappear, nor can they "punish it" into better behavior. If they are going to coexist in a galaxy which contains an interstellar polity the size of the Solarian League, then ultimately they are going to survive on a combination not only of their own ability to defend themselves but also of the League's goodwill and sense of . . . interstellar responsibility. They have to pursue a policy of enlightened self interest to help maintain that Solarian goodwill and respect for the rule of law, but they can't generate that respect by coercive policies from the outside.
Nor can they generate it by inflicting a vindictive peace rather than demonstrating how integrity and "interstellar responsibility" work.