Annachie wrote:If people had any doubts about how crooked Trump is, I present Kavanaugh.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 31 guests
Re: EXTRY! EXTRY! IMPEACHMENT IMMINENT! | |
---|---|
by smr » Tue Jul 10, 2018 11:08 am | |
smr
Posts: 1522
|
Question: Could he be a sacrificial lamb? The Democrats had bought airtime on radios before the nomination. They did not even know who the nomination was. If you know what the enemy is going to do, that should be taken into account. Allow the enemy to waste time, money, effort, and political capital before putting forth a desired candidate. I have no insight or special information but this is how I would handle the scotus pick. Besides, Ruth Bader Ginsburg might have to be replaced before the mid-term election cycle. Hey Gcomeau better find God and start praying that does not happen!
|
Top |
Re: EXTRY! EXTRY! IMPEACHMENT IMMINENT! | |
---|---|
by The E » Tue Jul 10, 2018 11:21 am | |
The E
Posts: 2704
|
Hey smr, have you found a link to that Cohen tweet yet or are you going to apologize for lying about it?
|
Top |
Re: EXTRY! EXTRY! IMPEACHMENT IMMINENT! | |
---|---|
by gcomeau » Tue Jul 10, 2018 12:08 pm | |
gcomeau
Posts: 2747
|
A president of the United States who is under serious criminal investigation just selected a candidate for a Supreme Court Justice specifically because that candidate has previously expressed the view that a president may not be indicted for a crime and that exact issue is rather likely to be brought before this court, thus essentially hand picking one of his own judges. And this is your reaction. Treating it like a sporting event where you have to analyze how your team strategized against "the enemy". Yeah, you sure care about the country. |
Top |
Re: EXTRY! EXTRY! IMPEACHMENT IMMINENT! | |
---|---|
by Annachie » Tue Jul 10, 2018 12:54 pm | |
Annachie
Posts: 3099
|
No, not indicted. He's actually correct there.
That's what impeachment is for. Not even questioned. He's argueing that the President shouldn't even be questioned by criminal investigators while President. Which kind of makes a mockery of the impeachment process. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You are so going to die. :p ~~~~ runsforcelery ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ still not dead. |
Top |
Re: EXTRY! EXTRY! IMPEACHMENT IMMINENT! | |
---|---|
by gcomeau » Tue Jul 10, 2018 1:05 pm | |
gcomeau
Posts: 2747
|
It is very questioned, that issue has never been ruled on by the SC. The guidance that a president cannot be indicted is a DOJ guideline only, based on the opinions of their own lawyers in the absence of guidance from the Court on the issue. |
Top |
Re: EXTRY! EXTRY! IMPEACHMENT IMMINENT! | |
---|---|
by cthia » Thu Jul 12, 2018 8:47 am | |
cthia
Posts: 14951
|
Unbelievable. Desperation sets in. The POTUS hears footsteps getting closer and closer and closer...
I detest this "might have" violated campaign finance laws. If true, is it a violation or not? Son, your mother says I have to hang you. Personally I don't think this is a capital offense. But if I don't hang you, she's gonna hang me and frankly, I'm not the one in trouble. —cthia's father. Incident in ? Axiom of Common Sense |
Top |
Re: EXTRY! EXTRY! IMPEACHMENT IMMINENT! | |
---|---|
by smr » Thu Jul 12, 2018 12:22 pm | |
smr
Posts: 1522
|
campaign finance violation: NO! Questionable moral judgement: Yes!
|
Top |
Re: EXTRY! EXTRY! IMPEACHMENT IMMINENT! | |
---|---|
by gcomeau » Thu Jul 12, 2018 12:29 pm | |
gcomeau
Posts: 2747
|
Just making note of this claim to go back later and watch you refuse to admit you were wrong when he gets nailed for violating campaign finance laws. |
Top |
Re: EXTRY! EXTRY! IMPEACHMENT IMMINENT! | |
---|---|
by smr » Thu Jul 12, 2018 12:51 pm | |
smr
Posts: 1522
|
I have no problem admitting to when I am wrong. I do not think I am wrong on the campaign finance laws! Here are the facts: I will be wrong today, tomorrow, and yesterday because I am human and to error is part of the human growth process.
|
Top |
Re: EXTRY! EXTRY! IMPEACHMENT IMMINENT! | |
---|---|
by gcomeau » Thu Jul 12, 2018 1:21 pm | |
gcomeau
Posts: 2747
|
Where did I call you a racist then? (Cue crickets) |
Top |