n7axw wrote:Tech is not static. Eventually the streak will no longer be cuttiwng edge for military purposes. As that happens the tech becomes more broadly known, more economical, and more broadly applied. While streaks for freighters might not be an immediate priority, I doubt that faster freighters would be objectionable either. So it's an idea whose time will eventually come, later if not sooner.
kzt wrote:Military hyperdrives are OLD technology. Like 400 years old. They are still not used by merchants.
n7axw wrote:
When some bit of tech is adapted, there is usually a point. With miltary hyperdrives there would be no point and the price has not come down...
Don-
The advantages really come into play on a fleet level. A 25% reduction in transit times for a merchie fleet translates into a 25% increase in carrying capacity for that fleet. Better, it is a 25% increase in carrying capacity without any increase in labor and a much smaller increase in capital investments than buying 25% more merchant ships. The individual ship can't carry more cargo on any one trip, but it can go on more trips in a given period or complete more longer trips within a fiscal period. Both scenarios mean more money if the new hyper generators don't require too much more time for servicing in a space dock.
Given the potentially greater volume of space the GA merchant marine and navy has to cover, selective adoption of the streak drive may well be a necessity.