Theemile wrote:PeterZ wrote:Ludcat does sound more apropos.
I wonder if Nimitz and Sam's kits will adapt to technology more naturally? They would be the first cats to grow up around humans and with human technology. Will they be able to shift their thinking to one that uses much more symbolism? Math is symbolism just as language is. 'Cats have never needed symbols to facilitate their understanding of the world. Direct memories passed from generation to generation have always sufficed. That is not enough when trying to understand human technology, much of which can't be directly experienced.
The kits may learn to understand human technology in ways their elders never could.
What you said just resonated with me in a way I never realized before. Treecats can't think abstractly, because their entire existence is memories or thoughts of actual objects or events. there are no "ifs", but stories of "when". No abstractions, only examples.
Liberty is literally the feeling after escaping a trap or intense danger.
Death is Literally the feeling of someone you know dying.
So if they don't have an example of
it, comprehending
it is totally alien to them.
So placeholders (like variables) literally do not exist for Treecats.
Exactly! That's why the Sam's kits are going to be an interesting set of individuals. They can see the use of the abstratctions from as early an age as they begin to sign. I doubt any treecat but those exposed to human abstractions at a very early age can learn how to apply those abstractions to their own thought patterns. Elder treecats might have a horrific time trying to reconcile symbolic thought to their own experiences.
One other thing to consider is that treecats have enormous memories, expecially Memory Singers. They store "memory pictures". They don't have a memory "app" that reconstructs common elements of shared memories to save space. Every memory is a unique analogue. Assuming their brains work similarly to human brains, 'cats may well have a much more efficient memory storage system to accomodate their smaller brain mass. It stands to reason that 'cats' brains would operate at least 2 more channels to account for mind voices and mind glows. So, instead of using the 6 average humans use, 'cats use at least 8. Those human channels would be the 5 senses and a channel to define the relational elements of the thought to the individual. Human memory also works best when organized in clumps of around 6.
The relational elements of a thought have to accomodate symbolism to some extent. They need to address concepts of conditional existance, future, possible future conditions and the menu of potential options available to the 'cat. None of these thoughts captures anything that exists for the 'cat. They are symbols in thought for what might exist. Otherwise, treecats would not be able to plan at all. Textev flatly states this is not the case.
All of this is my way of postulating 'cats have better information processing systems than humans in their heads. They simply need the proper programs written to accomodate their changed environment. They may never develop "software" to manipulate symbols as well as humans, but they almost certainly process stored information more quickly and more thoroughly.