smr wrote:How long was Trump being wiretapped? The logs are their.
Oh REALLY? Show us the Trump wiretap logs. We'll wait.
The text messages between the lead FBI investigator and his girlfriend said that Potus wanted to be kept abreast of the situation.
Sigh.... "the situation" being the counter intelligence investigation into Russian election attacks. That "situation" being both the FBI's job to investigate and the President's job to keep on top of.
It's stunning you think you are laying out some kind of scandal here.
FYI the Judge set aside Flynn's agreeing to plead guilty.
Again, SHOW US. Show us where the judge set aside Flynn's guilty plea.
You are completely full of crap.
The judge
delayed the
sentencing hearing, AT THE SPECIAL COUNSEL'S REQUEST, because Flynn isn't done spilling his guts and his sentence depends on how helpful he was as a cooperating witness.
The judge is looking at Prosecutor Misconduct.
SHOW. US. WHERE. HE. IS.
Geez, you are so full of crap I'm mildly amazed you haven't spontaneously burst in a giant crapsplosion.
For God's sake he had to sell his house to pay for lawyers. He's a retired General not a millionaire.
Yeah well maybe he shouldn't have committed the crimes that got him in trouble then. Boo-fucking-hoo.
So far Trump collusion case has produced no indictments on Trump.
It is not the "Trump collusion case".
It is a general investigation into the entire Russian attack on the election, any involvement it may have had with the Trump campaign directly, and whether Trump obstructed justice in attempting to interfere in that investigation.
Spoiler: more indictments are coming.
The Paul Manafort case has nothing to do with Trump that occurred 10 years before. So again, where is the evidence? What has the Special Counsel dug up on Trump? A few girlfriends on the side. A billionaire without a mistress. Just go look at long line of mistresses to our ex-Presidents. Nothing really damming so far but that could always change. If that happens, we will get rid of him.
You do get that Mueller's team has proven basically leak proof and there is no way in hell they are broadcasting anything they have on anyone until they decide it's time to indict that person right? ESPECIALLY if that person is the demonstratedly unstable tantrum throwing president who could try ordering the entire investigation shut down and provoke a constitutional crisis if he gets tipped off something he really doesn't like is coming.
You pointing to them not producing anything on anyone they haven't issued an indictment against *yet* is meaningless.
Just because you can not either follow the paper trail
Non existent imaginary paper trails are notoriously difficult to follow.
We'll all be here waiting for you to show us anything you have been asked to show us...