quite possibly a cat wrote:Yeah, which is why you need people like Hope on the jury!ldwechsler wrote:2. It could be argued that things done by Mesa could be construed as acts of war.
That makes no sense at all. First of all, she has not objected to the overall war but to a specific act by Terekhov.
She will be answering to a Board herself.
And why would the acts committed by Mesa somehow be viewed differently by her and how should they be viewed?