Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 54 guests
Re: How To Abandon Ship? | |
---|---|
by cthia » Sun Nov 05, 2017 1:50 pm | |
cthia
Posts: 14951
|
Oh come on. Can we really purport to know all of AF-1s capabilities? And do we really think that any offensive capabilities wouldn't be classified?
I'd personally choose to hedge any such bet or simply bet on the come. Son, your mother says I have to hang you. Personally I don't think this is a capital offense. But if I don't hang you, she's gonna hang me and frankly, I'm not the one in trouble. —cthia's father. Incident in ? Axiom of Common Sense |
Top |
Re: How To Abandon Ship? | |
---|---|
by saber964 » Sun Nov 05, 2017 2:24 pm | |
saber964
Posts: 2423
|
I don’t know. Why does the US President fly on a modified civilian airliner - and one originally designed about 50 years ago - instead of a much more survivable modified stealth bomber? Why, during wartime even, was President Roosevelt’s yacht an unarmed ship rather than at least a heavy cruiser? And heck, even the Presidential limos, while armored, are civilian designs and not based on a heavy tank, mine resistant APC, or other highly survivable military vehicle. By and large people just don’t do that. It often sends the wrong diplomatic message, you’re not supposed to send the head of state anywhere anticipated to be dangerous, and in unusual situations they can always catch a ride on a real warship (see Churchill taking HMS Prince of Whales to Newfoundland to meet Roosevelt, who’d taken the CA USS Augusta, and sign the Atlantic Charter.[/quote] First of all, FDR sailed aboard several ships during his Presidency. All were fleet flagships. IIRC FDR sailed on Augusta, Chicago, Tuscaloosa, San Francisco, Iowa, Portland and Indianapolis. It was safer than air travel was at the time. |
Top |
Re: How To Abandon Ship? | |
---|---|
by cthia » Sun Nov 05, 2017 3:51 pm | |
cthia
Posts: 14951
|
Before I crawl out on that logic limb, better first test for sturdiness. Inch..inch..inch..shake..shake..shake. Hmm, seems to be capable of bearing weight. LOL Better check more thoroughly, my ass has been on the line err limb far more often than I care for... LOLOL So, how would Ajax's drive being up on just her forward rings affect her sidewalls? Why do I suddenly feel like special counsel Robert Mueller investigating this administration. Don't stall the investigation please! LOL Son, your mother says I have to hang you. Personally I don't think this is a capital offense. But if I don't hang you, she's gonna hang me and frankly, I'm not the one in trouble. —cthia's father. Incident in ? Axiom of Common Sense |
Top |
Re: How To Abandon Ship? | |
---|---|
by cthia » Sun Nov 05, 2017 4:51 pm | |
cthia
Posts: 14951
|
Question. If a missile has lost lock and her final drive has run dry, does she still detonate if she "accidentally" hits a sidewall. Let's say as a result of some desperate maneuvering by a busy ship which runs into orphaned missile? I'm assuming a single coaster w/o drives is hard to see in a desperate and panicked situation? I'm thinking the answer is yes. After all, ballistic launches are nothing new. But I'm not sure if the missile has to be "set up" for that beforehand. Lest there be complications like in The Hunt for Red October when Sean Connery employed a tactic to turn into the oncoming torpedo thus closing the distance too quickly denying the missile time to arm itself, because the settings were not correct beforehand. "Oh the baggage I carry from other hairy situations," says Harry. Son, your mother says I have to hang you. Personally I don't think this is a capital offense. But if I don't hang you, she's gonna hang me and frankly, I'm not the one in trouble. —cthia's father. Incident in ? Axiom of Common Sense |
Top |
Re: How To Abandon Ship? | |
---|---|
by Vince » Sun Nov 05, 2017 11:35 pm | |
Vince
Posts: 1574
|
I think the answer is no, even if the missile is set up not to detonate automatically at the end of its powered run (to avoid the remote chance of accidentally hitting something you didn't want to beyond the target--things like, oh, inhabited planets). Consider how difficult it is to set off a nuclear bomb today and actually get a nuclear yield, rather than just a high explosive detonation. The individual explosives surrounding the nuclear material are timed to insanely small periods of time where if even one goes off either early or late outside of that incredibly tiny window of time, the implosion produced is not uniform and you don't get a nuclear yield. Now Honorverse nukes don't rely on explosives to get a nuclear yield, instead using gravity generators to uniformly squeeze the hydrogen down to insane pressures (higher than found in most stellar cores), but if a ballistic missile with its wedge down suffers damage by running into an intact sidewall, the gravity generators won't apply that uniform implosion and you won't get a nuclear yield. A missile's sidewall penetrator requires an active missile wedge to work, so a ballistic missile with its wedge down doesn't have a chance to get through the sidewall:
Now the missile might still be able to detonate (as a standard nuke) outside the sidewall and thereby inflict damage on the ship's sidewall generators, but given the speeds the missiles travel (especially DDMs and MDMs) compared to the speeds the ships can accelerate, the ship can't get out of the attacking missile's stand-off range when it detonates using the lasing rods as a laser head. It should be noted that standard nukes detonating even right next to the sidewall do far less damage to a ship than a laser head: Italics are the author's, boldface is my emphasis. And since the stand-off range of the laser head exceeds by a minimum of 30,000km the distance a standard nuke has get to a sidewall, the laser head will have time to deploy its lasing rods and detonate (unless stopped by PDLC fire), so I would consider the whole idea of a ballistic missile impacting a sidewall a non-starter---the conditions for it happening simply wouldn't exist if the missile is still functioning normally---the missile would deploy its laser heads and detonate before it would close the distance to the sidewall. -------------------------------------------------------------
History does not repeat itself so much as it echoes. |
Top |
Re: How To Abandon Ship? | |
---|---|
by cthia » Mon Nov 06, 2017 8:29 am | |
cthia
Posts: 14951
|
Thanks Vince. You Sag Isle graduates are the best! However, I remember a few times in storyline, when the Peeps were first confronted with extreme missile launches, they always piped in with something like, paraphrasing, "Surely they don't expect to hit anything at this distance as we won't be there." Or, "They can't expect anything to be left on their drives. It's a desperation launch." The same thoughts came again when Harrington? launched from outside the RZ? in BoM. The thoughts seemed to be on being able to close the distance and find a target without time left on the drive. But it seemed that the worry of destruction was still there. Also, when Mercedes Brigham arrived with Hamish, as the cavalry, but much too late to help Fearless he fired anyways from outside his missile range hoping to hit something. He didn't seem to be concerned there would be no detonation. "Fire anyway! Maybe we'll get lucky!" Seems textev is misleading? Or, some explosion is better than none? Son, your mother says I have to hang you. Personally I don't think this is a capital offense. But if I don't hang you, she's gonna hang me and frankly, I'm not the one in trouble. —cthia's father. Incident in ? Axiom of Common Sense |
Top |
Re: How To Abandon Ship? | |
---|---|
by Jonathan_S » Mon Nov 06, 2017 10:00 am | |
Jonathan_S
Posts: 8791
|
Those are laserhead missiles that (presumably) are still tracking their target. As we saw to great effect with the ballistic launches against Thunder of God in Honor of the Queen if a ship is blind and dumb enough to remain on an absolutely rigid course such that laserheads with burned out drives can coast to within 30,000 km of it, from a vector where the wedge isn't interposed, and without their sensor lock being broken -- then the laserheads are just as deadly as if they still had minutes of drive time left. But that differs from my understanding of the scenario you'd previously proposed -- which was a missile at end of run "accidentally" runs into a sidewall (I believe that implication that its sensors never saw it). A contact nukes needs an active drive to attempt to penetrate a sidewall, though with a sensor lock it could attempt to detonate just short to damage the sidewall. But a laser head just needs a sensor lock and to pass within 30,000 (now 50,000 for the latest GA laserheads) to be dangerous. (Note: IFF says there was an intermediate design between pure fusion contact nukes and laserheads, the nuclear gravitically directed energy weapon (NGDEW) - which used grav lensing to direct more of the omnidirectional pure fusing blast towards a sidewall - the then current RMN missile versions could focus damanging 'burn' from up to 8-10,000 km. However as far as I know all the RMN's missiles are multi-mode, so if one had sensor lock as it coasted by it'd attack as a laserhead from 5x further away instead of waiting to try and 'burn' the sidewall) But all of that relies on having a target lock -- not on blindly running into a sidewall. |
Top |
Re: How To Abandon Ship? | |
---|---|
by Vince » Mon Nov 06, 2017 10:41 am | |
Vince
Posts: 1574
|
Read all of Chapter 34 of THotQ, where Alice Truman, not Mercedes Brigham arrived with Hamish from Manticore in: Italics are the author's, boldface, underlined and colored text is my emphasis. Italics are the author's, boldface is my emphasis. Read these two Pearls--David has said that At All Costs is missing some critical information much earlier in the book due to an author editing error: Admiral Chin and the climax to the Battle of Manticore Admirals Chin and Kusak and the climax to the Battle of Manticore, part II IIRC, laser head stand off attack distance is up to approximately 50,000km for Mark23 MDM warheads as of At All Costs. -------------------------------------------------------------
History does not repeat itself so much as it echoes. |
Top |
Re: How To Abandon Ship? | |
---|---|
by cthia » Mon Nov 06, 2017 11:30 am | |
cthia
Posts: 14951
|
Thanks again Vince! Marvelous textev.
I'm almost there. Again, thanks to the both of you. Jonathan. Vince. The hole remaining for me is this. Re: A coaster that has lost lock. Can it reacquire or acquire the ship that has aimlessly wandered onto its path? Even though its drive is down and it cannot go after the newly acquired ship, would it conceivably still have the ability to acquire another ship, such as the unfortunate idiot that has wandered onto its path? "Yea, keep on coming you idiot. I "see" you. I've reacquired, and you're the new target." Then of course it can detonate at its standoff range. One other question born from the included textev. Maneuvering on attitude thrusters is simply a roll, right? Certainly thrusters cannot significantly change vector of missiles with such speed. But they can "roll" the missile toward its optimum blast front? Is what I'm getting. That correct? BTW, where is all of this technical stuff found? Jaynes and HoS? And do forgive my mixing up Brigham and Truman. Son, your mother says I have to hang you. Personally I don't think this is a capital offense. But if I don't hang you, she's gonna hang me and frankly, I'm not the one in trouble. —cthia's father. Incident in ? Axiom of Common Sense |
Top |
Re: How To Abandon Ship? | |
---|---|
by Vince » Mon Nov 06, 2017 12:22 pm | |
Vince
Posts: 1574
|
1) Yes it would have the capability to retarget. We have seen multiple battles in which missiles have lost lock on the original target and then acquired a new one after the missile control links have been cut while still under power. However, unless a ballistic flight segment was programmed in before launch, missiles are programmed to detonate at the end of their powered runs (keeps them from being a navigation hazard to ships, infrastructure and planets as well as denying the enemy the chance to capture and reverse engineer it). Also if missile telemetry to the control platform is lost, before the control platform cuts the control links, some missiles are programmed to immediately detonate (when Honor first came up against Moriarity at Solon, 60 Havenite missiles lost lock and detonated while under power), while others are programmed to switch to onboard targeting (usually these have been ship launched--the idea being if the launch platform is destroyed or mission-killed before it sends the command to the missiles to switch to onboard guidance, the missiles it was controlling still have a have chance to execute attacks). 2) Roll, pitch and yaw are done with RCS thrusters (when the wedge is not used to change direction) that a present day rocket scientist or astronaut would immediately recognize. As for the technical stuff, as well as much more background information on treecats, Honor's family, etc., if you haven't been reading the anthologies and the companion, you are missing out on a lot of useful information. The main Honorverse series (Includes the mainline Honor books, the Shadows books, the Crown of Slaves books, and the anthologies.) 1. On Basilisk Station (Apr 1992) 2. Honor of the Queen (June 1993) 3. The Short Victorious War (Apr 1994) 4. Field of Dishonor (Dec 1994) 5. Flag In Exile (Sep 1995) 6. Honor Among Enemies (Feb 1996) 7. In Enemy Hands (Jul 1997) 8. More Than Honor (Jan 1998) (Anthology) 9. Echoes of Honor (Oct 1998) 10. Worlds of Honor (Feb 1999) (Anthology) 11. Ashes of Victory (Mar 2000) 12. Changer of Worlds (Mar 2001) (Anthology) 13. War of Honor (Oct 2002) 14. The Service of the Sword (Apr 2003) (Anthology) 15. Crown of Slaves (Sep 2003) 16. The Shadow of Saganami (Oct 2004) 17. At All Costs (Nov 2005) 18. Storm from the Shadows (Mar 2009) 19. Torch of Freedom (Nov 2009) 20. Mission of Honor (June 2010) 21. In Fire Forged (Feb 2011) (Anthology) 22. A Rising Thunder (Mar 2012) 23. Shadow of Freedom (Mar 2013) 24. House of Steel (May 2013) (Compendium) Grayson Navy Letters Home (2012) in the Baen Free Short Stories 2012 collection. 25. Beginnings (Jul 2013) (Anthology) 26. Cauldron of Ghosts (Apr 2014) 27. Shadow of Victory (Nov 2016) The Star Kingdom series: (Stephanie Harrington & treecats) 0. Honorverse Tech Bu9 (Oct 2011) in the Baen Free Short Stories 2011 collection. 1. A Beautiful Friendship (Oct 2011) 2. Fire Season (Oct 2012) 3. Treecat Wars (Oct 2013) The Manticore Ascendant series: (Travis Long, very early RMN) 0. A Call to Arms in the Beginnings anthology (July 2013) 1. A Call to Duty (Oct 2014) 2. A Call to Arms (Oct 2015) 3. A Call to Vengeance (Mar 2018) -------------------------------------------------------------
History does not repeat itself so much as it echoes. |
Top |