robert132 wrote:tooldtocare wrote:It Is Time To Talk Impeaching Trump
1. to accuse (a public official) before an appropriate tribunal of misconduct in office.
Pathological lying is a form of “misconduct in office” making it an impeachable offence
Dump is a pathological liar and that is NOT what we want as our President.
We, the citizens of this great Nation must act NOW
What say you, fellow Americans-?
Let me answer with a question ... how did you feel about all the lies told by Obama and his supporters in Congress to get the ACA passed? When he made changes to that law after it was signed by Executive Order instead of changing the law by the Constitutional method of running it through Congress?
Without going into the specifics of Obama's truthfullnes regarding the ACA (not knowledgable enough on the topic), I'd point out there's a difference between a liar and a pathological liar...
Politicians lie, yes. To a large degree, that's inevitable. And bluntly, you get the politicians you vote for. The last election showed that a lot of voters prefer being lied to rather than uncomfortable truths. That said, politicians (and most people in general) often lie in fairly predictable ways. They might overstate the benefits of a policy or understate the drawbacks, they might fudge numbers, etc.
Trump - and his administration by extension - is different. He's openly lied about things which can be trivially proven to be untrue - and where there's no real advantage in lying. For example, see the statement about the size of the inauguration crowd, or Trump taking credit for inventing the phrases "priming the pump" or "fake news". There was no real reason to go there other than self-aggrandizement.
The upshot is that the Trump White House has zero credibility. A lot of people won't believe anything they say, even if it's trivial, because they've shown they'll lie about things they have no reason to lie about.
robert132 wrote:What "Russian help" or "collusion" was that?
The "collusion" that a full year of investigating by the FBI and both Congressional Judicial Committees AND a Special Prosecutor could not find?
Please, enlighten us.
Pretty sure the Special Prosecutor, for one, was appointed less than a year ago.
And for that matter, the GOP has had little issue investigating their political opponents even when previous investigations showed no wrong-doing (they're still trying to do so with Clinton's emails despite the result of the FBI investigation).