Daryl wrote:Speaking from the other side of the world, I've seen what I believe is credible evidence that his team and relatives colluded closely with a number of Russians.
Could be fake news, but if they can mock that much up without a flaw we are screwed anyway.
I'm not a fan of the US political/military/industrial complex, and generally don't like the US "Powers that Be", but this is all Trump's own debacle.
Uh, calling it collusion when it is same old same old as what happens EVERY TIME there's an election upcoming, that's just ridiculous.
Yeah, Trumps people PROBABLY was very much on the edge(or over it) of what was legal, but again, nothing unusual with that. As much as i dislike bashing Obama, crap like that happened during his time as well, it's where some of the claims about corruption, especially about Hillary Clinton originates from.
Then the highly illegal hijinks against the Russian San Francisco embassy, that was actually an act of war. Trying to cause provocations much lately?
Oh yeah, fake news lately by the way...
Russia was accused of preparing to start a war during Zapad 2017, because OBVIOUSLY that must be what they were planning when they had their exercise right at the same time as Nato played around in the Baltic, and oh dear they clearly had AT LEAST over 100000 troops involved, and clearly the only reason to lie about the numbers was because they were up to something and being nefarious.
Right, then Zapad 2017, which is a Russian exercise that occurs every 4 years, ie simply COULD not had anything to do with the Nato exercises since it was planned 3 years earlier, the actual number of troops involved, based on witness accounts admits "well uh, it seems like they had pretty much exactly as many there as they lied about, i mean said", there were not even a hint of any incidents outside the training area, the worst thing that happened was 4 people injured from a single "friendly" misfire.
Which compared to Nato's rampage in the Baltic seems outright sleepy as the Nato exercises have already caused 5 deaths that i know about.
http://www.independent.co.uk/voices/rus ... 61856.htmlThat's about as close as you can get to not get fake news in EUSA media if Russia is even remotely involved.
Oh and not long ago, remember last year, the accusations of Russian mass doping?
Where it was claimed there was EVIDENCE against "nearly a hundred"(97 IIRC) athletes and "hundreds" of others?
Yeah, no. There was ONE actual case of doping. Which we now find out was actually discovered and reported by the Russians themselves.
And that was used to ban a bunch of Russians from the olympics.
In Syria, the facts on the ground are also very interesting, 6 months after CIA stopped supporting just SOME groups of terrorists there, the fighting is suddenly dying down a bit, and a few hundred THOUSAND refugees have returned home.
Think about that while considering what the media is generally writing about the place.
In the last 10 years, there's barely ANY news that involves Russia that isn't fake news.
I could bring up plenty more examples, but many are more or less regional so it would force a bit more typing than i want to get into right now.