|
cthia
Fleet Admiral
Posts: 14951
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 1:10 pm
|
The human element. Psychological importance. Being in tune with.
or
a plain old air of consideration adopted, in lieu of an inept display of insensitivity and indifference.
She should have exited the plane dragging the warmth of bundles of blankets. I'm betting she was probably unaware that blankets, shit paper, pampers, tampons, water and food are the number one items needed.
============================================================
Her shoes are important inasmuch as they subtly convey the honest body language that astute observers can and will see. It is important to the media that saw them. Is important to the people ravaged by the storm because they would have seen her first two feet put forward as an insult. It shows where her mind is, which was not on the storm ravaged state or the very real fatalities, the deaths, or the effort that must begin to recover. You don't go to a job interview with inappropriate shoes. She'll be auditioning for another term if their asses aren't impeached.
"What? She didn't come to help in those shoes!"
More importantly, her attire did not show that she identifies with the storm ravaged state or that her empathy, such as it is [not], was, or is, existent. She should have dressed for the occasion, as did her husband, and shown (or at least given the impression) that she came to sweat and join in Texas' rebuilding from her very first "psychological impression" conveyed, exiting AF-1. The media, the partial media as you put it, isn't the only ones watching. Her attire was insulting and sad. It shows where their heart is, as does the lack of empathy of not saying a single word about the "deaths," their constituents, who died. Not a single moment of silence. As every single president before him "humanly" did. If I were a family who lost loved ones and or friends, I would have felt insulted, hurt, sad and abandoned.
It only serves to strengthen my vote towards Melania as being the most lame duck first lady that voters ever made a mistake on.
Every other first lady stepped off the plane, as ready to sweat and in the right mind, as their president/husband.
But you are correct, I should be worrying more about her husband than her. Or her insensitive choice of first, inappropriately dressed, feet put forward.
Visiting a storm ravaged state is no place for any moment of vanity. There certainly is no moment of vanity for any one single victim, some who are now displaced and living on a single cot eight members deep and rationing water and shit paper. Some of the victims don't even have shoes! You ever volunteered your services and visited a storm ravaged city to help? I have. Several times. Even loaned my Humvee for free. Her shoes were inappropriate. Shouldn't have even made the trip. Her foot attire was no less insulting or inconsiderate, than a bikini-clad-Melania would have been when first seen exiting AF-1.
You simply don't show up to help a farmer plow his field in a pair of Gucci's or Alexander McQueen's. You don't take cleats to a debutante ball, and you don't showcase Jimmy Chou at a tailgating party. And you certainly don't wear Guccis to a storm ravaged city.
Inappropriate attire unless your heart's desire is only contingent of your own ire.
Perhaps they were scheduled to meet the Russians afterward. She certainly didn't "pack" for Texas.
Again and as usual, the human element, is ignored, discounted and disrespected again.
And right now Texas, if you somehow missed it as Melania did, is all about the human element.
Son, your mother says I have to hang you. Personally I don't think this is a capital offense. But if I don't hang you, she's gonna hang me and frankly, I'm not the one in trouble. —cthia's father. Incident in ? Axiom of Common Sense
|
