WLBjork wrote:Tenshinai wrote:Tom Clancy also had the F-19 be real.
Red Storm Rising, published 1986.
Jane's All The World's Aircraft 1986-1987, 1987-1988 and 1988-1989 included the F19. Not only that, there were 3 flight simulators based on it and at least 2 models. For a book in 1986, it wasn't an unreasonable inclusion.
True, I played some of those games. To give Mr. Clancy his due he did put a LOT of research into the tech behind his stories, all of it from open sources like "Aviation
Leak and Space Technologies" and so forth. Some was so accurate the NIS(NCIS) visited him to check his sources and claims.
I met the gent once while he was doing research for Red Storm, he visited my ship (USS Caron) and at the conclusion of the visit he asked our skipper what class Soviet sub he most wanted to sink. I don't know what the Captain's answer was but he had us nail a
Tango SSK after she put a torp into USS
America (CV 66) without sinking the birdfarm - unrealistic because even in those days both sides recognized the best way to at least mission kill a large combatant (battlewagon or carrier) is to detonate a large warhead under the keel, and the Soviets easily had that capability as did we.
I have to say that the A10 isn't, IMO, perfect. It's great for hunting tanks, it's great for surviving in high-threat environments due to its redundancy and design.
The problem is that dang 30mm cannon throws big rounds, and even the training rounds have a lot of energy which will make the shockwave disorientating (possibly disabling) when fired close to friendly troops - not to mention that 5MOA accuracy level. In other words, it's not a precision weapon for short range support.
As an aside I should say that NO ONE who has ever been on the receiving end of a burst from that gawd-awful gun ever wanted to repeat the experience.
So, whilst the A10 shouldn't be retired without a direct replacement, I think it should be supplemented by a new (turboprop - which no doubt will upset the USAF) aircraft, built with similar levels of survivability and designed for the COIN role, with a principle armament of 7.62mm and/or 12.7mm machine guns.
Oh, and I'd support the replacement for the A10 being a 2-seated. I've seen one incident where 2 A10s failed to properly communicate with the ground controller, resulting in them strafing a Scorpion or Scimitar light tank and causing casualties.
There are some proposals out there for an A-10 replacement that seem pretty interesting. And there are a number of lighter and less expensive aircraft that could augment the numbers of COIN aircraft or serve the same role for the Afghan Air Farce or Iraqis if they ever get to the level of where they could be trusted.
Meanwhile, for a close support helo for our Afghan and Iraqi allied there is always the Russian Mi-24/25. It can be one hell of a machine when properly armed and utilized.
"We don't fear the Russians (Soviets,) but we DO fear their helicopters." - Attributed to a Taliban commander.