Rednek731 wrote:So what I'm interpreting from all of this is that the only way a corporation that wasn't also a state could possibly run a fleet of Q-Ship's on it's own (ignoring whether or not they carry LAC's for now) is if that corporation either had a license/permit from every star nation they shipped to/from, or if they were going to a select group of star nations (possibly operating through a mutual trade agreement) that mutually agreed to grant licenses/permits to allow this one corporation to bring Q-Ships within their borders for the purposes of trade (although that might be admittedly unlikely, as said licenses/permits would probably limit their business to that group of star nations).
Also, that a corporation that was primarily a shipping company could only be allowed by the larger galaxy to own and operate their own warships (most likely of limited scale), and would only make a legitimate profit from those warships being used if they only used them for defensive actions in defense of their assets (such as a privately owned/leased orbital shipyard, or of their merchantman that are traveling in places that have relatively high concentrations of pirates) or if they used the warships as hired muscle and sort of leased them out to convoys from other companies which couldn't protect themselves but were willing to pay for a relatively cheap (probably cheaper than a government ship anyway, although I could be wrong) means of defense against pirates/privateers/warships from enemy nations/etc.
More or less.
There are legal constraints and economic constraints.
As far as we know there is no legal constraint against a private individual or commercial company from building, owning, and operating armed vessels.
In fact the Andermani Empire was founded by y Gustav Anderman, a highly successful mercenary who had a shrewd business sense. His mercenary company had their own warships and apparently, way back then, made sufficient profit from their contracts to keep the business healthy.
However it is illegal to enter the territorial space of an owned star system without permission from its owners. And it appears extremely common for governments to refuse that permission to other people's armed non-military ships or private warships. This legal sovereignty combined with normal policies against allowing armed ship permission combines to make armed freighters
effectively prohibited regardless of economics.
(Obviously treaties, contracts, or other methods could grant ongoing permission for specific armed ships to enter given star systems)
As for private warships, they may be looked upon with suspicion but again it doesn't appear to be illegal to own one. But like armed freighters almost no system will allow their entry. So while a company could legally choose to own and operate them to, say, provide escorts between systems while never entering those system's territorial space it would appear cost prohibitive to do so without additional funding sources.
So the choices of being mercenary (whether defensively or offensively), getting a letter of marque to be a privateer in some war are essentially driven by economics. You don't to do those to legally own a warship - it's just damn hard to afford the upfront and ongoing costs of owning one if you don't.