Imaginos1892 wrote:I'm glad he got us out of that useless economic suicide pact. If they really want to do something about 'global warming', they should stop spewing hot air about it!
It's an agreement that the US should wreck our economy for nothing. The three biggest carbon dioxide emitters get carte blanche to do whatever they want. If the 'climate accord' achieved every one of its objectives, global industrial carbon dioxide emissions would be held back by less than two years' worth over the next twenty years — at a cost of over eight trillion dollars, much of it to be paid by the US.
I see you haven't been keeping up with the news.
Did you know, for example, that India and China are both well on their way to beat their Paris agreement goals? So much so, in fact, that the reluctance of the US to do the same is compensated in its entirety?
Or that the assumptions the Trumpet made are based on wrong or misleading data? (I know; who'd have thought that republicans are unable to get correct data on climate change)
Global Warming, or whatever they're calling it this week, is not a problem that can be solved by coercive Big Government taking people's choices away. It can be solved by private industry providing them with better choices, if Big Government doesn't prevent it.
Citation needed. Please point out what incentives private industry has to reduce emissions in the absence of punitive regulations.