Louis R wrote:From which, BTW, Dennis, you should be able to determine that some of what's been said is incorrect, and more simplified.
Such as?
I estimated a potential Prolong lifespan between 300 and 400 years. The fact that it was not "one and done" was established elsewhere. I implicitly assumed around 300 years as normal, with longer in special cases depending upon recipient.
One point about Prolong was established in the effect on Treecat adoptions of humans. Treecats have a lifespan of about 250 Earth years, that the tragedy for treecats, pre-prolong, was the the human they bonded with was likely to die long before they did. With Prolong, that was no longer the case, giving a Prolong recipient a lifespan at least as long as a treecat's.
The stuff in the Infodump clarified but did not fundamentally change my assumptions. For instance, while later generation Prolong was administered earlier, and froze cosmetic age at an earlier state, there was no indication total lifespan was longer with later generation Prolong. And someone older than 19 could still get the first generation treatments up till age 25, which could be significant for folks in places like the Talbott Quadrant who could now potentially get Prolong through Manticore.
Establishing the necessary infrastructure to produce Prolong locally would be a longer term development, and that the infrastructure
should be extremely expensive is no surprise. Advanced pharmaceuticals and the infrastructure needed to produce them are extraordinarily expensive now, and the reasons are the same.
And in any case, my speculation was prompted by Damien Hardahap getting a Prolong booster from the Alignment he was told would add a century to his life. I don't see Isobel Bardasanno having a reason to lie about that, and it indicates the Alignment research efforts extended to more than things like the Streak and Spider drives, and they may well have Prolong more effective than Beowulf's.
______
Dennis