Duckk said take Mrs Clinton\not in jail here.

DDHv wrote:

Tenshanai wrote:And i just read an article about how at least 50 of the electors that voted Trump, did so illegally.

"More than 50 Electoral College members who voted for Donald Trump were ineligible to serve as presidential electors because they did not live in the congressional districts they represented or held elective office in states legally barring dual officeholders."

It is also worth looking for elected officials who do not live in the district which voted for them. I wonder how many would be found if this were searched for on all sides of the political spectrum

From: The Growth Stock Wire, 12/10/16

Elizabeth received a strange letter from her congressman.

"We have to be on guard against our enemies… and not be afraid to name them."

A brave, forthright stand?

But wait, he didn't name the enemies.

That left us wondering: Who are our enemies?

Muslims, Jews, Arabs… Russians, Iranians, North Koreans… capitalists, the "Deep State," Yankees… liberals, conservatives?

And what does he mean by our?

A politician's enemies are more likely to be our friends than our enemies. Our most dangerous enemies could be the feds themselves!

But people love simple and preposterous lies. They much prefer them to the truth.

Truth is elusive, and doesn't make us feel good, unlike most lies. It takes work to test it, and many choose to be ignorant instead. Haven't most of us noticed this

And Bull Shit is defined as statements which may be factually correct but are lies because they are meant to deceive or lead one to a false assumption.

DDHv wrote:

Tenshanai wrote:And i just read an article about how at least 50 of the electors that voted Trump, did so illegally.

"More than 50 Electoral College members who voted for Donald Trump were ineligible to serve as presidential electors because they did not live in the congressional districts they represented or held elective office in states legally barring dual officeholders."

It is also worth looking for elected officials who do not live in the district which voted for them. I wonder how many would be found if this were searched for on all sides of the political spectrum

Uh, that IS one of things they DID to get what i posted...

Tenshinai wrote:Uh, that IS one of things they DID to get what i posted...

Now trump wants a complete review of the voter registration polls for illegals and dead people. I wonder how many republican officials are squirming now. He assumes that the dead always vote Democrat.

WeirdlyWired wrote:

Tenshinai wrote:Uh, that IS one of things they DID to get what i posted...

Now trump wants a complete review of the voter registration polls for illegals and dead people. I wonder how many republican officials are squirming now. He assumes that the dead always vote Democrat.

Well, based on available info, the democrats do tend to get an easy majority from dead voters.
The rep´s have 70-80% of the electronic fake votes to make up for it, along with the people that doesn´t get to vote because they´re in democratic-leaning regions.

WeirdlyWired wrote:

Tenshinai wrote:Uh, that IS one of things they DID to get what i posted...

Now trump wants a complete review of the voter registration polls for illegals and dead people. I wonder how many republican officials are squirming now. He assumes that the dead always vote Democrat.

Regardless of how they vote, this investigation needs to happen. I was so hoping this would happen.

PeterZ wrote:

WeirdlyWired wrote:Regardless of how they vote, this investigation needs to happen. I was so hoping this would happen.

Coincidently or not, it seems the investigation is going to focus on the big states which Trump mostly lost - rather than the smaller states on which the election swung.

Tenshinai wrote:

Well, based on available info, the democrats do tend to get an easy majority from dead voters.
The rep´s have 70-80% of the electronic fake votes to make up for it, along with the people that doesn´t get to vote because they´re in democratic-leaning regions.

And where is this "available info" exactly? I'm assuming it's, well, available?

PeterZ wrote:Regardless of how they vote, this investigation needs to happen. I was so hoping this would happen.

"This investigation" (in person voter fraud, dead people voting, etc...) has already happened over and over and over again.

Ohio GOP investigated it. Found it was infinitesimal.

http://www.dispatch.com/content/stories ... demic.html


Bush instructed his Justice department to aggressively pursue voter fraud incidents and in 5 years they turned up essentially jack squat. Barely any cases of actual voter fraud at all and the few that did end up getting prosecuted were mostly just someone making a mistake not some sinister conspiracy to try to swing some election.

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/04/12/washi ... fraud.html

How many times does this have to be explained? People pretending to be someone else and voting... illegals voting... dead people voting... THIS IS NOT HOW ELECTIONS GET RIGGED. Everyone who knows anything about this knows that. The Democrats know it. The Republicans know it (but keep pretending they don't).

And if Trump yells and screams and tells investigators to look for this kind of thing they are going to find exactly what EVERYONE ELSE has found.

Eyal wrote:Coincidently or not, it seems the investigation is going to focus on the big states which Trump mostly lost - rather than the smaller states on which the election swung.

Yeah... "coincidentally"...

He's going to make a lot of noise to try to salve his bruised ego and that's about it.

Eyal wrote:

PeterZ wrote:Regardless of how they vote, this investigation needs to happen. I was so hoping this would happen.

Coincidently or not, it seems the investigation is going to focus on the big states which Trump mostly lost - rather than the smaller states on which the election swung.

Now would be the time for pushback to make sure the investigation reaches into the Red States too. I'll gladly support that!

gcomeau wrote:

Tenshinai wrote:

Well, based on available info, the democrats do tend to get an easy majority from dead voters.
The rep´s have 70-80% of the electronic fake votes to make up for it, along with the people that doesn´t get to vote because they´re in democratic-leaning regions.

And where is this "available info" exactly? I'm assuming it's, well, available?

Well, it´s online at least. There´s been threads with links and articles on several forums about diebold and whatever they changed names to, along with other methods of cheating and attempts to estimate how common they are, or in a rare few cases show actual cheatrates.

Can´t say i´ve bothered keeping track of it any longer over the last year or so. It´s basically just gone over to "same old same old, repeat ad nauseum".

The most interesting parts were in 2005(?) and a few years later when some computer forums i´m on had people post logs of successful hacks of voting machines.

Tenshinai wrote:

gcomeau wrote:Well, based on available info, the democrats do tend to get an easy majority from dead voters.
The rep´s have 70-80% of the electronic fake votes to make up for it, along with the people that doesn´t get to vote because they´re in democratic-leaning regions.



And where is this "available info" exactly? I'm assuming it's, well, available?

Well, it´s online at least. There´s been threads with links and articles on several forums about diebold and whatever they changed names to, along with other methods of cheating and attempts to estimate how common they are, or in a rare few cases show actual cheatrates.

Can´t say i´ve bothered keeping track of it any longer over the last year or so. It´s basically just gone over to "same old same old, repeat ad nauseum".

The most interesting parts were in 2005(?) and a few years later when some computer forums i´m on had people post logs of successful hacks of voting machines.

I will repeat it again, Yes there may be cheating going on and the dead and illegal registrations.

HOWEVER there are not thousands of individuals going to the polls in person and casting those millions of ballots. They are being cast inside the courthouse, or at the polling precincts by election officials.

Cheating is purging voters in predominantly minority precincts days before the election. There are a couple of dozen ways to cheat by election officials and only one way to cheat by individuals. And the election officials know the names of those bogus voters.

Republicans are no more honest than democrats. And no more dishonest.

I hope you get what you're looking for, alternative facts and all. God luck on that millions of fraudulent voters marching in one-by-one (Hurrah, Hurrah! )