Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 32 guests

US Presidential Candidates

The Management is not responsible for the contents of this forum. Enter at your own risk.
Re: US Presidential Candidates
Post by PeterZ   » Tue Dec 06, 2016 10:33 am

PeterZ
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 6432
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 1:11 pm
Location: Colorado

gcomeau wrote:
smr wrote:Great...you don't like I cited Townhall. Fine no problem! What is the Alt Right? What is the definition of the term?


The AP:

https://blog.ap.org/behind-the-news/wri ... -alt-right


Short version: it's a term white nationalists and white supremacists came up with to try to legitimize themselves by getting people to call then that instead of the more clear "racists".

And the media never should have gone along with it, but they did... although now they seem to be waking up a little... although it's a bit late...


Agreed. This is one assembly of groups that deserves the term racist.
Top
Re: US Presidential Candidates
Post by Annachie   » Fri Dec 09, 2016 8:27 am

Annachie
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 3099
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 7:36 pm

OK, Linda McMahon as small business advisor could be interesting.
Wonder if Kane will get a gig as well.

Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You are so going to die. :p ~~~~ runsforcelery
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
still not dead. :)
Top
Re: US Presidential Candidates
Post by gcomeau   » Fri Dec 09, 2016 1:01 pm

gcomeau
Admiral

Posts: 2747
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2014 5:24 pm

Annachie wrote:OK, Linda McMahon as small business advisor could be interesting.
Wonder if Kane will get a gig as well.

Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk


The likely next National Security Adviser being a completely deranged conspiracy theorist is going to be even more "interesting". Can't wait until the first emergency deployment of the military to prevent Agenda 21 UN Black Helicopters from invading Texas or something.
Top
Re: US Presidential Candidates
Post by WeirdlyWired   » Fri Dec 09, 2016 5:02 pm

WeirdlyWired
Captain of the List

Posts: 487
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2016 1:08 pm
Location: 35 NW center of nowhere.

gcomeau wrote:
Annachie wrote:OK, Linda McMahon as small business advisor could be interesting.
Wonder if Kane will get a gig as well.

Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk


The likely next National Security Adviser being a completely deranged conspiracy theorist is going to be even more "interesting". Can't wait until the first emergency deployment of the military to prevent Agenda 21 UN Black Helicopters from invading Texas or something.

And who betterto put at the helm of the department of labor than a blood-sucking capitalist who hates paying his employees minimum wage and makes them punch out to clean up after the restaurant closes.

yes it happens,and yes all the fast food chains deny it even as they pay the fines for doing it.
Helas,chou, Je m'en fache.
Top
Re: US Presidential Candidates
Post by Tenshinai   » Sat Dec 10, 2016 2:30 pm

Tenshinai
Admiral

Posts: 2893
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 8:34 pm
Location: Sweden

https://www.facebook.com/filmsforaction ... 932075276/

This was just way too accurate. :mrgreen:

Guess now we know where he took his public speaking style from.
Top
Re: US Presidential Candidates
Post by Michael Everett   » Sat Dec 10, 2016 4:58 pm

Michael Everett
Admiral

Posts: 2619
Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 3:54 am
Location: Bristol, England

Tenshinai wrote:https://www.facebook.com/filmsforaction/videos/1682525932075276/

This was just way too accurate. :mrgreen:

Guess now we know where he took his public speaking style from.

...at least he isn't purple?
~~~~~~

I can't write anywhere near as well as Weber
But I try nonetheless, And even do my own artwork.
(Now on Twitter)and mentioned by RFC!
ACNH Dreams at DA-6594-0940-7995
Top
Re: US Presidential Candidates
Post by Tenshinai   » Sun Dec 11, 2016 9:37 am

Tenshinai
Admiral

Posts: 2893
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 8:34 pm
Location: Sweden

Michael Everett wrote:...at least he isn't purple?


Yet. I´m sure he´s working on it.
Top
Re: US Presidential Candidates
Post by Annachie   » Sun Dec 11, 2016 6:27 pm

Annachie
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 3099
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 7:36 pm

Why the hell is President Elect Trump continuing on with the PR bull shit about landslide wins?

Hell, why are people buying it. It's not hard to look up.

46th out of 58 elections by EC, 55th out of 58 elections by popular vote.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You are so going to die. :p ~~~~ runsforcelery
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
still not dead. :)
Top
Re: US Presidential Candidates
Post by biochem   » Sun Dec 11, 2016 10:01 pm

biochem
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1372
Joined: Thu Aug 19, 2010 8:06 pm
Location: USA

Annachie wrote:Why the hell is President Elect Trump continuing on with the PR bull shit about landslide wins?

Hell, why are people buying it. It's not hard to look up.

46th out of 58 elections by EC, 55th out of 58 elections by popular vote.


He's trying to control the narrative. Psychological studies have shown that if you repeat something that sounds as if it might be true enough times people will believe it, even if it is not actually true. He won by a lot more than predicted so "landslide" doesn't sound completely outrageous even if it doesn't necessarily match the historical data. Therefore the phrase landslide doesn't trigger people's false-o-meters. Repeat and repeat again, eventually the standard way to refer to this victory will be as a landslide. It's a classic persuasion technique, advertisers use it all the time.
Top
Re: US Presidential Candidates
Post by PeterZ   » Mon Dec 12, 2016 2:46 pm

PeterZ
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 6432
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 1:11 pm
Location: Colorado

Hey, Biochem, what do you think of this bit of analysis? Both links to the same author and provide a more complete analysis.

It matches well with much of Trump's picks, especially Tillerson (assuming Tillerson isn't a stalking horse). His pick of Wilbur Ross is also an astute pick. They'll need a foreign policy chief that understands the flow of oil as it relates to geopolitics as well as someone who knows heavy manufacturing supply chains.

I am looking at my portfolio and making adjustments. Betting on capital flight to the Angelosphere looks like a good bet.


http://www.forbes.com/sites/peterhigh/2016/12/05/reasons-why-the-us-will-dominate-the-world-economy-for-the-foreseeable-future/#7b92295b3841

http://www.cfapubs.org/doi/10.2469/cp.v33.n4.1
Top

Return to Politics