

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 7 guests
Re: US Presidential Candidates | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
PeterZ
Posts: 6432
|
It could also be that pejoratives such as racist, sexist and homophobe are so overused that they can mean anyone that breathes, even enlightened Australian Immigration Ministers. The use of those terms is so loose, one doubts its veracity ANY time it is used in politics.
That's where political correctness has led us. |
Top |
Re: US Presidential Candidates | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
WeirdlyWired
Posts: 487
|
UH ... Didn't George Orwell post a pretty damning essay about governments manipulating the language as propaganda, like back in the late 1940s? To blame it on "Political Correctness, is a bit historically short sighted. Not to say that recent events by many on both sides of the political divide haven't hastened the process. Helas,chou, Je m'en fache.
|
Top |
Re: US Presidential Candidates | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
biochem
Posts: 1372
|
|
Top |
Re: US Presidential Candidates | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
biochem
Posts: 1372
|
Interestingly, the I hate both of them voting block overwhelmingly voted Trump at the end.
|
Top |
Re: US Presidential Candidates | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
PeterZ
Posts: 6432
|
|
Top |
Re: US Presidential Candidates | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Tenshinai
Posts: 2893
|
Even better!
![]() ![]()
Anyone even the slightest surprised?
It wont be. The original Diebold "scandal" was big news for 5 minutes or so, with great promises of how everything would be fixed and investigated. And then the company changed its name and everything was juuuust fine. And the same voting machines are still in use, many with the exact same hardware AND software as the Australian hacker already proved he could get into with barely no effort and rig the result in almost any way he wanted.
What does "not at all" tell you then? ![]() ![]() |
Top |
Re: US Presidential Candidates | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Annachie
Posts: 3099
|
No investigation tells us that the system was set up to disadvantage someone, or advantage someone, and that those in charge don't want to look at anything just in case.
Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You are so going to die. :p ~~~~ runsforcelery ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ still not dead. ![]() |
Top |
Re: US Presidential Candidates | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Tenshinai
Posts: 2893
|
2(that we know of) of the original owners were associates of the republican party with blatant links to the GWB administration. |
Top |
Re: US Presidential Candidates | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
smr
Posts: 1522
|
1) Strange how they want to challenge the election results 2 weeks later.
Now, the guy that was saying the Russians interfered with election has said they did not. Could it be that Michigan does not have the computer based voting. Also, they have already done an automatic recount in Michigan and Trump still won. Now, Michigan has optical and paper ballot voting only. This means no chance of hacking the vote from the Internet. 2) Yesterday, the Obama administration has said the election was valid. (11/25/16) 3) Here's a pretty good website that explains how cheating occurs and how you can change the system or monitor the elections. http://www.blackboxvoting.org/ |
Top |
Re: US Presidential Candidates | |
---|---|
![]() |
|
Annachie
Posts: 3099
|
Well we know the russians did interfere, but honestly we don't know if it was by contract or government orders.
It seems everybody is contracting ... social media assistance these days. (Our government got caught using Indians for example) As for fiddling with the machines, I really hope that isn't possible. It shouldn't be. Not without fiddling the machines before the election anyway. Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You are so going to die. :p ~~~~ runsforcelery ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ still not dead. ![]() |
Top |