Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 49 guests

SLN Logistics

Join us in talking discussing all things Honor, including (but not limited to) tactics, favorite characters, and book discussions.
Re: SLN Logistics
Post by Brigade XO   » Sat Nov 12, 2016 3:04 pm

Brigade XO
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 3190
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 12:31 pm
Location: KY

An SD really isn't going to function well as a DD or CA tender. It would need to free up all sorts of both free space for materials and add handling equipment to deal with moving it around. It isn't set up to do that and it would require also dealing with the armor and various subsystems that would be in the way.

You might be able to support a number of LAC squadrons but it would be complicated since, again, you would have to add systems and accesses to storage space. And you would have to deal with where to house the LACs (and crews and service staff). Just putting the LACs out on the exterior hull -accessed through existing or new hatches(with supporting environmental and power/data lines) is probably not a great idea as you still have to have places to actualy service & repair them.
Top
Re: SLN Logistics
Post by SYED   » Sat Nov 12, 2016 5:34 pm

SYED
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1345
Joined: Sun Apr 03, 2011 11:03 pm

Using the carriers as tenders seem to make more sense to me.
Top
Re: SLN Logistics
Post by kzt   » Sat Nov 12, 2016 6:03 pm

kzt
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 11360
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 8:18 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

SYED wrote:Using the carriers as tenders seem to make more sense to me.

And the name of the SLN lac carrier class?
Top
Re: SLN Logistics
Post by Fox2!   » Sat Nov 12, 2016 9:56 pm

Fox2!
Commodore

Posts: 925
Joined: Wed Feb 25, 2015 1:34 am
Location: Huntsville, AL

kzt wrote:
SYED wrote:Using the carriers as tenders seem to make more sense to me.

And the name of the SLN lac carrier class?


SLNS Bupkes
Top
Re: SLN Logistics
Post by Theemile   » Sun Nov 13, 2016 3:09 pm

Theemile
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5241
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 5:50 pm
Location: All over the Place - Now Serving Dublin, OH

Fox2! wrote:
npadln wrote:
(snippage)

So, if SD's add little value to that strategy and if they can't partake in any other action without making themselves little more than high value, bulls-eye targets then what good are they? Well, they could serve a role as a logistics train. A lot of space in those hulks and a lot of those hulks in space. Parked well outside regions of conflict they could provide interim supply and support needs for their smaller cousins thereby significantly extending mission times.


In order to use an SD as an overgrown destroyer tender, you would have to trade magazine/berthing/messing space for storage areas. Presumably, there is sufficient machine shop capacity in an SD to support a couple of squadrons of CL/DD. You would also have to have enough berthing to be able to take off the crew of a DD that was in need of serious repair.

As noted in other threads on what to do with Sollie SDs, that's a lot of work for not much gain. And you would tie up a building slip that could more productively be used for building DD/CL.


OK, no one is going to believe that I'm saying this, but....


Using an SD as a tender is an idea that the SLN may find palatable and pursue. This is not the same as saying it is a good idea, but one that makes sense to them. Most importantly, their position is not the same as Manticore's

1) They have plenty of unused shipyards and shipyard capability. They have not started to build up their forces yet and they have plenty of excess capability they have been building for the last 300 years in their bloat. Finding a dozen properly equipped unused slips and trained repair crews to do modifications would be easy for the SLN, and not hamper any growth they may have.

2) They believe time is on their side. They don't believe that the GA can overwhelm them quickly. They are looking at long wars and reprecussions 10-20 years out. They would be willing to start a project that may take a year to see results, like modifying 6-12 SDs as tenders.

3) They already have trained crews for these ships. Unlike the GA, they have crews already trained on these ships, their software, and their maintenance and tactical systems. Even training specialty crews on them isn't a negative, as their training is in line with the training needed for every other SLN BF ship.

4) The SLN has spare parts for these ships. Despite their age, the SLN has a full inventory of what they would need for a deployment.

5) They have not attempted serious SD modifications to learn how difficult it is. The Manties had run into issues updating their Anduril SDs as they developed new technologies, then had nightmares updating Gryphons to fire MDMs. The SLN has not done this and has no idea how difficult it will truly be, even through their leadership will be told it will be difficult by their experts.

6) The SLN is in a political situation where new builds will be frowned upon or forbidden, while taking some ships out of the reserve and modifying them will be seen as a smart expenditure of resources. It doesn't matter if a 4 Mton freighter can be built for 1/2 the cost in 1/2 the time and carry 2x as much, using existing resources will be seen as the smart choice to the politicos and public.

7) A heavily modified SD will still require 3-4 thousand personnel to man. The SLN has this manpower to spare.

In addition,

8) This fleet train vessel will not require an escort - it will probably be left with it's hammerhead armaments, and a ~1/4 it's broadside offensive armament. It will be able to hold it's own against CAs and below and threaten BCs with heavy damage. If anything, it will be seen as the escort for the fleet train.

9) Modifications on reserve vessels can start now, under local commander's orders, without going through political authorization first. If the project is shut down later, any changes can be swept under the rug and the ships lost amongst the reserve fleet without any political ramifications.

Now this is not to say this is a GOOD idea. We are talking about a 7 Mton ship with ~1-2 Mtons of cargo capability, with a crew of 3-4 thousand. A Volcano class ammo ship is a 4 Mton ship with 3-3.5 Mtons of cargo space (with dedicated ammo and pod loading equipment), and a crew of <100. The Volcano has no offensive capability, but has probably 2/3rds the point defense capability of the SLN SD. Both have Mil spec drives. And most likely, the Volcano is quicker and cheaper to build than it is to modify the SLN SD.

Unfortunately, an SD is designed for operations which span ~2 months, so it will need larger hydrogen bunkers, parts supplies, and food supplies for itself for an expended excursion. This will cut into the mass dedicated to supporting other ships.

Of course, in addition to being used as a tender, an SD also has large hospital spaces, limiting the need for dedicated hospital ships. The excess crew can be used to replace crews on the raiders it is supporting. As others have pointed out, it has large machine shops, so it can repair and fabricate larger parts for the ships it is supporting. These partially replace other ships capabilities in the fleet train.

However, none of these qualities are the same as seen in a dedicated hospital, repair or ammo ship - as we've seen, SD fleets travel with specialized ships of these types to support them as well. So obviously, they do not have all the capabilities these specialty ships would have - just more capability than the smaller raiders they support would have.

So, while I still don't think it is a good idea, it is an idea which may be attractive for the SLN, because many of the negatives of their use in the GA's service are not there for the SLN.
******
RFC said "refitting a Beowulfan SD to Manticoran standards would be just as difficult as refitting a standard SLN SD to those standards. In other words, it would be cheaper and faster to build new ships."
Top
Re: SLN Logistics
Post by Louis R   » Mon Nov 14, 2016 2:26 pm

Louis R
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1298
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 9:25 pm

Not absurd. Perhaps underinformed.

Capital ships worked perfectly well for commerce raiding for a good 3,000 years, and would probably do just as well today [recall that SSNs are on today's list of capital ships along with carriers] as they did in the past. And have to be countered in the traditional way: with capital ships of similar strength.

It was commerce raiding - or attempted raiding - that killed Graf Spee, Bismark and Scharnhorst. It was a capital-ship raider that killed the Jervis Bay. Both sides of the last two major wars turned to subs for commerce raiding because they had run out of capital ships, or couldn't get them past those aforementioned ships of similar strength, not because they regarded submarines as The Better Way.

npadln wrote:
I know my comment is going to be completely hypothetical and somewhat absurd but it seems to me that SD's and similar huge capital ships are going to play a rather insignificant role in a TRUE commerce raiding strategy...

When I think of commerce raiding I think of U-Boats and shipping lanes; I don't think of land assaults and Battle Ships. The idea is to cut off and harass the free movement of trade and commerce between allied planets; to hem THAT deep inside the gravity wells of planets associated or allied with the GA; to create a concern that the GA would have to expend a significant part of their limited resources on.

So, if SD's add little value to that strategy and if they can't partake in any other action without making themselves little more than high value, bulls-eye targets then what good are they? Well, they could serve a role as a logistics train. A lot of space in those hulks and a lot of those hulks in space. Parked well outside regions of conflict they could provide interim supply and support needs for their smaller cousins thereby significantly extending mission times.
Top
Re: SLN Logistics
Post by Jonathan_S   » Mon Nov 14, 2016 6:07 pm

Jonathan_S
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 8793
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 2:01 pm
Location: Virginia, USA

Louis R wrote:Not absurd. Perhaps underinformed.

Capital ships worked perfectly well for commerce raiding for a good 3,000 years, and would probably do just as well today [recall that SSNs are on today's list of capital ships along with carriers] as they did in the past. And have to be countered in the traditional way: with capital ships of similar strength.

It was commerce raiding - or attempted raiding - that killed Graf Spee, Bismark and Scharnhorst. It was a capital-ship raider that killed the Jervis Bay. Both sides of the last two major wars turned to subs for commerce raiding because they had run out of capital ships, or couldn't get them past those aforementioned ships of similar strength, not because they regarded submarines as The Better Way.
Eh, you can use capital ships for commerce raiding - but they're usually better employed doing something that only capital ships can do. Blockading or sinking the enemy's capital ships. Bombarding or bombing his harbors.

Sometimes capital ships were used for commerce raiding, but it was situational and unusual. Maybe a bit less so with the advent of carriers, but even then using planes from a fleet carrier to hunt and sink freighters tended to be either an incidental activity on the way to/from a larger goal, or it was part of cutting off supplies to specific destinations as part of a blockade operation.

But by and large, even in the age of sail, you didn't send the 90 gun ships of the line in penny packets after freighters or whalers. Even frigates didn't get assigned that as frequently as the smaller sloops, brigs, and corvettes. For a given cost and manpower the cheaper, smaller, ship could be in more places at once. And they could usually run if they stumbled upon the enemy ships of the line - and if they couldn't the navy could afford to lose them. Risking a ship of the line pounced on and smashed in isolation is far less acceptable.


During WWII the Germans did try to go after convoys with capital ship raiders, but that was partly because they didn't have enough battleships to engage the RN battleline. A strategy of necessity, or poverty, as the case may be. Though a case could be made that picking off the isolated battleship covering forces keeping a distant eye on some convoys would be a good use of capital ships. It theoretically gives you the possibility of inflicting a defeat in detail up small parts of their battleline - and that's a worthy use of your capital ships; but only because there are capital ships there to destroy.
Top
Re: SLN Logistics
Post by saber964   » Mon Nov 14, 2016 8:29 pm

saber964
Admiral

Posts: 2423
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 8:41 pm
Location: Spokane WA USA

Jonathan_S wrote:
Louis R wrote:Not absurd. Perhaps underinformed.

Capital ships worked perfectly well for commerce raiding for a good 3,000 years, and would probably do just as well today [recall that SSNs are on today's list of capital ships along with carriers] as they did in the past. And have to be countered in the traditional way: with capital ships of similar strength.

It was commerce raiding - or attempted raiding - that killed Graf Spee, Bismark and Scharnhorst. It was a capital-ship raider that killed the Jervis Bay. Both sides of the last two major wars turned to subs for commerce raiding because they had run out of capital ships, or couldn't get them past those aforementioned ships of similar strength, not because they regarded submarines as The Better Way.
Eh, you can use capital ships for commerce raiding - but they're usually better employed doing something that only capital ships can do. Blockading or sinking the enemy's capital ships. Bombarding or bombing his harbors.

Sometimes capital ships were used for commerce raiding, but it was situational and unusual. Maybe a bit less so with the advent of carriers, but even then using planes from a fleet carrier to hunt and sink freighters tended to be either an incidental activity on the way to/from a larger goal, or it was part of cutting off supplies to specific destinations as part of a blockade operation.

But by and large, even in the age of sail, you didn't send the 90 gun ships of the line in penny packets after freighters or whalers. Even frigates didn't get assigned that as frequently as the smaller sloops, brigs, and corvettes. For a given cost and manpower the cheaper, smaller, ship could be in more places at once. And they could usually run if they stumbled upon the enemy ships of the line - and if they couldn't the navy could afford to lose them. Risking a ship of the line pounced on and smashed in isolation is far less acceptable.


During WWII the Germans did try to go after convoys with capital ship raiders, but that was partly because they didn't have enough battleships to engage the RN battleline. A strategy of necessity, or poverty, as the case may be. Though a case could be made that picking off the isolated battleship covering forces keeping a distant eye on some convoys would be a good use of capital ships. It theoretically gives you the possibility of inflicting a defeat in detail up small parts of their battleline - and that's a worthy use of your capital ships; but only because there are capital ships there to destroy.



The Kriegsmarine really blew it with that idea. You could have multiple situations like Jervis Bay vs Scheer or S&G vs Ramillies FYI I've played the S&G vs Ramillies scenario several times and it usually boils down to S&G getting a phyrric victory against Ramillies and the convoy escapes mostly intact or S&G get blasted to floating scrap metal.
Top
Re: SLN Logistics
Post by pnakasone   » Mon Nov 14, 2016 10:57 pm

pnakasone
Captain of the List

Posts: 402
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 11:21 pm

Submarine warfare suffered from being seen as not an honorable or proper way to fight a navel war. There where a couple of points in the Battle of the Atlantic where the UK was a few months from being forced to either sue for peace or face starvation. How many subs could have been built with the resources Germany used to build just the Graf Spee let alone the other big gun ship that where built?
Top
Re: SLN Logistics
Post by Jonathan_S   » Mon Nov 14, 2016 11:26 pm

Jonathan_S
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 8793
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 2:01 pm
Location: Virginia, USA

pnakasone wrote:Submarine warfare suffered from being seen as not an honorable or proper way to fight a navel war. There where a couple of points in the Battle of the Atlantic where the UK was a few months from being forced to either sue for peace or face starvation. How many subs could have been built with the resources Germany used to build just the Graf Spee let alone the other big gun ship that where built?

True, yet... Changes don't happen in a vacuum. Germany laid down the Deutschland-class starting in 1929, in (nominal, or at least apparent) compliance with the Treaty of Versailles. Hilter didn't rise to power and and start U-Boat construction in defiance of that treaty until 1935. By that point all 3 Deutschland-class 'pocket battleships' had already been launched, and 2 were in commission with the 3rd, Admiral Graf Spee, commissioned at the start of 1936.

So in the actual timeline those resources were sunk in the pocket battleships long before Hitler was running things. I guess you could scrap them for steel and part for subs, but that's far more effort than simply allocating the raw materials in the first place.

But my actual point was if Germany had started building subs in 1929 its massively unlikely that Britain would allow them to do so unmolested for a decade before war kicked off. But even if they had the fact that Germany is now building subs and not battleships means England would be free to, say, cut back on their King George V-class battleship building and divert those resources into additional convoy escorts and anti-submarine forces. Yes if Germany could wave a magic wand and have their early 1943 U-boat forces available to them in the fall of 1939 - with everything else unchanged - England would be in a lot more trouble. But like I said, changes don't happen in a vacuum - you can't build those forces on Earth in the 20th century without people knowing and starting to make plans to react to your build-up.
Top

Return to Honorverse