Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 28 guests

US Presidential Candidates

The Management is not responsible for the contents of this forum. Enter at your own risk.
Re: US Presidential Candidates
Post by WeirdlyWired   » Thu Nov 10, 2016 4:40 am

WeirdlyWired
Captain of the List

Posts: 487
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2016 1:08 pm
Location: 35 NW center of nowhere.

To those who voted for Trump hoping th would drain the swamp:I hope the change we get as a country is the change you want. I know my step-daughter is creaming her pants with expectation of overturning Roe v Wade. And She was sick when Trump got the nomination and was voting for Johnson until the archangels in their Crystal cathedrals declared trump a "proto-christian." Talk (IMHO) about voter manipulation.
Helas,chou, Je m'en fache.
Top
Re: US Presidential Candidates
Post by Daryl   » Thu Nov 10, 2016 7:06 am

Daryl
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 3562
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 1:57 am
Location: Queensland Australia

Fully agree.
Strange to say that from the other side of the world, but it was like a very slow train crash. Horrifying but hard to look away from.

Senior Chief wrote:Free at last, free at last, thank god free at last from having to listen to campaign ads... at least until the next batch of blood sucking lying ticks decide to run for office for the purpose of lining their pockets... MHO for what it is worth...
Top
Re: US Presidential Candidates
Post by dscott8   » Thu Nov 10, 2016 11:54 am

dscott8
Commodore

Posts: 791
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2010 6:17 am

My big worry now is not Trump. Because he has no detailed policies and no experience, he will only be the visible face of the GOP's back room apparatchiks. What worries me is that his most radical supporters THINK they just got a license to run riot. As time goes by and Trump inevitably fails to deliver on their expectations of legalized xenophobia and repealed human rights, they may go off the chain.
Top
Re: US Presidential Candidates
Post by Tenshinai   » Thu Nov 10, 2016 12:28 pm

Tenshinai
Admiral

Posts: 2893
Joined: Tue Nov 02, 2010 8:34 pm
Location: Sweden

dscott8 wrote:My big worry now is not Trump. Because he has no detailed policies and no experience, he will only be the visible face of the GOP's back room apparatchiks. What worries me is that his most radical supporters THINK they just got a license to run riot. As time goes by and Trump inevitably fails to deliver on their expectations of legalized xenophobia and repealed human rights, they may go off the chain.


That´s bad enough, but i think you underestimate the risk of Trump, what if he DO manage to push through some of his garbage?

He´s offensive and an idiot, not stupid, and he now has a majority in both houses to more easily bribe to vote for his idiocies.
Top
Re: US Presidential Candidates
Post by gcomeau   » Thu Nov 10, 2016 2:06 pm

gcomeau
Admiral

Posts: 2747
Joined: Tue Dec 02, 2014 5:24 pm

dscott8 wrote:My big worry now is not Trump. Because he has no detailed policies and no experience, he will only be the visible face of the GOP's back room apparatchiks. What worries me is that his most radical supporters THINK they just got a license to run riot. As time goes by and Trump inevitably fails to deliver on their expectations of legalized xenophobia and repealed human rights, they may go off the chain.


Remember, Bush had Cheney.



Trump has Pence... just a different flavor of bigot, but with the government experience to do something about it while knowing how to maintain a surface appearance of respectability.



And this is keeping in mind it was reported that when Trump was shopping for VP picks they were being told they could be in charge of "domestic and foreign policy"...... so you know, EVERYTHING. While Trump would focus on big picture "making America Great Again", or basically standing in front of the cameras stroking his own ego and doing none of the actual behind the scenes work like his entire life has been so far.
Top
Re: US Presidential Candidates
Post by Michael Everett   » Thu Nov 10, 2016 4:18 pm

Michael Everett
Admiral

Posts: 2619
Joined: Tue Nov 03, 2009 3:54 am
Location: Bristol, England

gcomeau wrote:Remember, Bush had Cheney.

Trump has Pence... just a different flavor of bigot, but with the government experience to do something about it while knowing how to maintain a surface appearance of respectability.

And this is keeping in mind it was reported that when Trump was shopping for VP picks they were being told they could be in charge of "domestic and foreign policy"...... so you know, EVERYTHING. While Trump would focus on big picture "making America Great Again", or basically standing in front of the cameras stroking his own ego and doing none of the actual behind the scenes work like his entire life has been so far.

So... effectively America has elected Shadow President Pence?
~~~~~~

I can't write anywhere near as well as Weber
But I try nonetheless, And even do my own artwork.

(Now on Twitter)and mentioned by RFC!
ACNH Dreams at DA-6594-0940-7995
Top
Re: US Presidential Candidates
Post by Starsaber   » Thu Nov 10, 2016 4:28 pm

Starsaber
Captain (Junior Grade)

Posts: 255
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 9:40 am

PeterZ wrote:At the risk of being a Pollyanna, I do have one wistful hope.

I hope that Trump's complete boorishness allows the rest of the country to re-engage in direct political conversation without the filter of political correctness.

That has stifled conversation and worthwhile discussions profoundly.


How is common courtesy a bad thing?
Top
Re: US Presidential Candidates
Post by Imaginos1892   » Thu Nov 10, 2016 7:22 pm

Imaginos1892
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1332
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2012 3:24 pm
Location: San Diego, California, USA

It's not about courtesy, it's about having the government throw people in jail for saying Bad Words. I thought that went out with McCarthy.

This is a free country. Our freedom must not be held hostage by every whiner that claims to be 'Offended' by it. Anybody can choose to Take Offense at anything.

Some people want to offend you. When you get all puffed up with offense and indignation, you give them power over you.

People have the right to be assholes. You have the right to call them assholes. Forcing them to be silent because they might Offend Your Delicate Sensibilities is right out of Orwell's 1984.
-------------------
Mrs. Tweedy! The chickens are revolting!!
Top
Re: US Presidential Candidates
Post by Starsaber   » Thu Nov 10, 2016 10:59 pm

Starsaber
Captain (Junior Grade)

Posts: 255
Joined: Thu Mar 24, 2011 9:40 am

Imaginos1892 wrote:It's not about courtesy, it's about having the government throw people in jail for saying Bad Words. I thought that went out with McCarthy.

This is a free country. Our freedom must not be held hostage by every whiner that claims to be 'Offended' by it. Anybody can choose to Take Offense at anything.

Some people want to offend you. When you get all puffed up with offense and indignation, you give them power over you.

People have the right to be assholes. You have the right to call them assholes. Forcing them to be silent because they might Offend Your Delicate Sensibilities is right out of Orwell's 1984.
-------------------
Mrs. Tweedy! The chickens are revolting!!


I agree, some people take it as far as you're saying, but I've seen plenty of photos/stories of blatant hate speech in the past couple days, so some level of political correctness is absolutely necessary.
Top
Re: US Presidential Candidates
Post by dscott8   » Thu Nov 10, 2016 11:13 pm

dscott8
Commodore

Posts: 791
Joined: Thu Jul 15, 2010 6:17 am

Imaginos1892 wrote:It's not about courtesy, it's about having the government throw people in jail for saying Bad Words. I thought that went out with McCarthy.

This is a free country. Our freedom must not be held hostage by every whiner that claims to be 'Offended' by it. Anybody can choose to Take Offense at anything.

Some people want to offend you. When you get all puffed up with offense and indignation, you give them power over you.

People have the right to be assholes. You have the right to call them assholes. Forcing them to be silent because they might Offend Your Delicate Sensibilities is right out of Orwell's 1984.
-------------------
Mrs. Tweedy! The chickens are revolting!!


So if you walk up to Neil DeGrasse Tyson and call him an uppity nigger who should forget astrophysics and get back to picking cotton, his only option is call you an asshole? Am I to assume you would just accept that and not escalate? Do you think every such exchange will consist of a peaceful exchange of Fuck Yous and folks will just accept that and move on?

There is a legal principle that "fighting words" are an incitement to breach of the peace. (US Supreme Court, Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, 1942.) I will grant that some people have overdone the agenda-based editing of language, but I disagree that there is a legal right to be an asshole. Not when being an asshole provokes trouble.
Top

Return to Politics