Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Shannon_Foraker and 96 guests

Multi-generational bonding

Join us in talking discussing all things Honor, including (but not limited to) tactics, favorite characters, and book discussions.
Re: Multi-generational bonding
Post by Somtaaw   » Tue Oct 04, 2016 9:40 am

Somtaaw
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1203
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2014 11:36 am
Location: Canada

George J. Smith wrote:IIRC, from Worlds of Honor 6 (Beginnings) in the short story Beauty and the Beast, the link between Alison & Alfred was akin to bonding, and in the Best Laid Plans story before he bonded with Honor Nimitz mentioned that he may have bonded with Alfred if Alfred had not "bonded" with Alison.

It seems as though changes have manifested in the thought processes of the Harrington clan.



That seems to have been a one-off bond experience thing however. As we originally saw Alfred and Alison Harrington (HotQ I believe), they were a regular couple who enjoyed teasing their daughter just a little, but still regular parents without any ESP/bond thing.

Then the Beauty and the Beast story showed that Alfred could unerringly point towards her, and later tracks her down to rescue her. She was also aware of him which is two-way treecat bond there, not simply one-way Harrington modified genes acting similar to treecats only due to repeated long-endurance association.

Later stories, written after BatB, again present the Harrington family as the same as any others. Thrust a little more into the spotlight due to Honor's escapades, but still a generic hetero-couple without even the slightest ESP. Now I'll grant that really we haven't needed to see any of that, or that perhaps RFC hadn't quite decided yet if that was how he wanted to explain Honor's particular acute sensitivity.


The fullout treecat level bond during the BatB, is very interesting though. That was an all-up bond, started by and maintained by a human, to a human. And I think it was mentioned how they were almost inseparable after the rescue by Alison's brother/twin which is very reminiscent of the often mentioned "new bonds, the bondee doesn't want to put the cat down, ever. Physical contact is very important to the bond, etc etc".

There also appeared to be at least a short-term, uhmm transfer is the best word I suppose, of Alfred's Marine training to Alison. She adapted extremely quickly for the holding action they fought for someone who, right up until the very latest books, didn't think she needed a Grayson Armsman full-time because "who'd want to hurt her?" That's indicative of someone who hasn't taken any form of self-defense course whether melee or sidearm. Which further extrapolation, and the story having taken place on decadent, licentious Beowulf, means she wouldn't have had even basic sidearm training while a medical doctor either.
Top
Re: Multi-generational bonding
Post by Vince   » Tue Oct 04, 2016 12:19 pm

Vince
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1574
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 11:43 pm

cthia wrote:
WLBjork wrote:Problem there is that Alfred wasn't adopted, nor was Alison.

I'm also pretty sure that whilst Harringtons have had the highest proportion of adoptions, it's not quite a once-per-generation thing - but it can't be far off either (as the Wintons are number 2, and theirs have been almost generational).

Yet, how exposed were Alfred and Alison to treecats as a whole during their time? And I wonder if occupation and age would have a bearing on the fruit.

I see bonding as the same concept as a human finding his/her soulmate. If you exclude certain races, religions, occupations and also factor in geographic separation then the chance of finding one's soulmate seriously dwindles.

Geographic separation seems to be changing for the cats, which is a positive. And if certain genetic modifications are a necessity, that becomes a limiting factor.

And hopefully the human hosts' minds will be more acceptable as youths, before they become too hardwired in their ways.

At any rate, I suspect that the larger overall interaction between species will see more adoptions.

What I always wondered, is why treecats can't taste a human's mindglow and know whether it's suitable for him or her without ever actually meeting him -- from the taste of that mindglow from his colleague.

<Gather around cats, I've got a wealth of new minds for you all to taste. "Acts Wildly" I've got one I think you'll like quite well>

From the portion of your post I bolded, I think you have not yet read House of Steel, or else have not read very deeply into the details provided in the Honorverse Companion, as opposed to the novella it contains:
House of Steel, The Star Empire of Manticore, Nonhuman Sentient Species, Treecats, NOTABLE TREECATS wrote:Leaf Catcher of Fire Runs Fast Clan (Ariel)
Leaf Catcher bonded with a very young Elizabeth Winton on her state visit to Sphinx in 1880 PD, while she was still the Crown Princess. While smaller and younger than Laughs Brightly, he is in many ways far more mature (or at least sober), as befitting the bondmate to the woman the treecats call “Soul of Steel.”
According to Leaf Catcher’s account, Clan memory singers had passed around images of Elizabeth Winton’s mind-glow to all of the clan members, and Leaf Catcher felt drawn to Elizabeth immediately. When the young Crown Princess arrived in Sphinx for her visit, Leaf Catcher appeared at the edge of the landing pad to meet her, and their bonding was nearly immediate.
Italics are the authors.
-------------------------------------------------------------
History does not repeat itself so much as it echoes.
Top
Re: Multi-generational bonding
Post by Jonathan_S   » Tue Oct 04, 2016 2:54 pm

Jonathan_S
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 8792
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 2:01 pm
Location: Virginia, USA

RedBaron wrote:What I'm suspecting is that each bonding permanently changes the adopted human's neural pathways, and when that person has children then the minds of those children tend to be somewhat altered/different from normal humanity. Then factor in that one or more of those children get adopted themselves - which further alters their brains.]
I can certainly see that the bonding could cause neural pathways in the brain to change. It would be almost inevitable as repeated new types of stimulus work by rewiring the brain. But that doesn't usually require a genetic change, much less one in the genes of a person's ova or sperm.

So I find the chance of a direct genetic change passing through to the bonded persons offspring to be quite unlikely; hence not a plausibly way of getting the multi-generational improvement you were looking for.



However I could easily believe that there's a more subtle force at work leading to similar ends through different means.
A bonded person, especially one even slightly sensitive to a 'cat's emotional link, will (I believe) likely be influenced by the 'cat's reaction to people they interact with. And I'd hypothesize that even an already bonded 'cat would be especially favorable towards someone with a good mind glow -- one that at least approached the level to be compatible with a bonding. That favorability leaking back down the emotional connection could apply a selection pressure towards marrying people with bright mind glows (whether or not they have bonded).

Then presumably the offspring of people with brighter mind glows would tend to be on the bright glow side themselves; and more likely to be bonded and subject to the same influences. And of course the ones most sensitive to the 'cats would also be the ones being most inclined towards others with tasty mind glows. Give that several generations and you might well see, do to indirect selection pressure, the upward trend you were thinking off. All without requiring a mental change to directly alter the bonded person's reproductive DNA.
Top
Re: Multi-generational bonding
Post by Weird Harold   » Tue Oct 04, 2016 3:38 pm

Weird Harold
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4478
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2014 10:25 pm
Location: "Lost Wages", NV

Jonathan_S wrote:So I find the chance of a direct genetic change passing through to the bonded persons offspring to be quite unlikely; hence not a plausibly way of getting the multi-generational improvement you were looking for.



However I could easily believe that there's a more subtle force at work leading to similar ends through different means.


This ^^^

A 'Cat's reaction/acceptance of a bond-mate's potential spouse would tend to result in a "selective breeding" for compatibility with Treecats.
.
.
.
Answers! I got lots of answers!

(Now if I could just find the right questions.)
Top
Re: Multi-generational bonding
Post by cthia   » Tue Oct 04, 2016 4:13 pm

cthia
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 14951
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 1:10 pm

cthia wrote:
WLBjork wrote:Problem there is that Alfred wasn't adopted, nor was Alison.

I'm also pretty sure that whilst Harringtons have had the highest proportion of adoptions, it's not quite a once-per-generation thing - but it can't be far off either (as the Wintons are number 2, and theirs have been almost generational).

Yet, how exposed were Alfred and Alison to treecats as a whole during their time? And I wonder if occupation and age would have a bearing on the fruit.

I see bonding as the same concept as a human finding his/her soulmate. If you exclude certain races, religions, occupations and also factor in geographic separation then the chance of finding one's soulmate seriously dwindles.

Geographic separation seems to be changing for the cats, which is a positive. And if certain genetic modifications are a necessity, that becomes a limiting factor.

And hopefully the human hosts' minds will be more acceptable as youths, before they become too hardwired in their ways.

At any rate, I suspect that the larger overall interaction between species will see more adoptions.

What I always wondered, is why treecats can't taste a human's mindglow and know whether it's suitable for him or her without ever actually meeting him -- from the taste of that mindglow from his colleague.

<Gather around cats, I've got a wealth of new minds for you all to taste. "Acts Wildly" I've got one I think you'll like quite well>
Vince wrote:From the portion of your post I bolded, I think you have not yet read House of Steel, or else have not read very deeply into the details provided in the Honorverse Companion, as opposed to the novella it contains:
House of Steel, The Star Empire of Manticore, Nonhuman Sentient Species, Treecats, NOTABLE TREECATS wrote:Leaf Catcher of Fire Runs Fast Clan (Ariel)
Leaf Catcher bonded with a very young Elizabeth Winton on her state visit to Sphinx in 1880 PD, while she was still the Crown Princess. While smaller and younger than Laughs Brightly, he is in many ways far more mature (or at least sober), as befitting the bondmate to the woman the treecats call “Soul of Steel.”
According to Leaf Catcher’s account, Clan memory singers had passed around images of Elizabeth Winton’s mind-glow to all of the clan members, and Leaf Catcher felt drawn to Elizabeth immediately. When the young Crown Princess arrived in Sphinx for her visit, Leaf Catcher appeared at the edge of the landing pad to meet her, and their bonding was nearly immediate.
Italics are the authors.

Well I'll be a monkey's uncle. Thanks Vince. I was worried that I was reaching but it just seemed plausible. Thanks again.

And you are correct in your assumptions regarding my reading homework.

Son, your mother says I have to hang you. Personally I don't think this is a capital offense. But if I don't hang you, she's gonna hang me and frankly, I'm not the one in trouble. —cthia's father. Incident in ? Axiom of Common Sense
Top
Re: Multi-generational bonding
Post by zyffyr   » Tue Oct 04, 2016 6:18 pm

zyffyr
Lieutenant Commander

Posts: 110
Joined: Fri Feb 19, 2016 5:26 pm

RedBaron wrote:
Daryl wrote:Can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't


Great, here we go again.


If you want blind acceptance of whatever you say, I suggest talking to a dog. Part of engaging in genuine discussion is finding the problems with the idea.
Top
Re: Multi-generational bonding
Post by MaxxQ   » Tue Oct 04, 2016 7:24 pm

MaxxQ
BuNine

Posts: 1553
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:08 pm
Location: Greer, South Carolina USA

RedBaron wrote:
Daryl wrote:Can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't can't


Great, here we go again.


zyffyr wrote:If you want blind acceptance of whatever you say, I suggest talking to a dog. Part of engaging in genuine discussion is finding the problems with the idea.


Wise beyond his post count :mrgreen:
Top
Re: Multi-generational bonding
Post by WeirdlyWired   » Tue Oct 04, 2016 8:07 pm

WeirdlyWired
Captain of the List

Posts: 487
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2016 1:08 pm
Location: 35 NW center of nowhere.

WLBjork wrote:
What I always wondered, is why treecats can't taste a human's mindglow and know whether it's suitable for him or her without ever actually meeting him -- from the taste of that mindglow from his colleague.

<Gather around cats, I've got a wealth of new minds for you all to taste. "Acts Wildly" I've got one I think you'll like quite well>
Vince wrote:From the portion of your post I bolded, I think you have not yet read House of Steel, or else have not read very deeply into the details provided in the Honorverse Companion, as opposed to the novella it contains:
House of Steel, The Star Empire of Manticore, Nonhuman Sentient Species, Treecats, NOTABLE TREECATS wrote:Leaf Catcher of Fire Runs Fast Clan (Ariel)
.



????? Spoiler alert??? In a more limited way, That is what happens in ART before Filareta's fleet makes its grand appearance. The cats decide to be useful as body guards for the Havenites. Though not adoption, itn was commented that the personalities of cat and human seemed particularly well matched as if ... as you suggest.
Helas,chou, Je m'en fache.
Top
Re: Multi-generational bonding
Post by WLBjork   » Tue Oct 04, 2016 11:57 pm

WLBjork
Commander

Posts: 186
Joined: Wed Jan 11, 2012 5:45 am

WeirdlyWired wrote:????? Spoiler alert??? In a more limited way, That is what happens in ART before Filareta's fleet makes its grand appearance. The cats decide to be useful as body guards for the Havenites. Though not adoption, itn was commented that the personalities of cat and human seemed particularly well matched as if ... as you suggest.


What about Sorrow Singer's statement to Honor from ART for that matter?



However, getting back to the original point, there's some interesting tidbits in the short story "Changer of Worlds" (from the anthology "Changer of Worlds"), in which the Treecats note that the Harrington clan are less mind-blind than others.

That suggests that whilst exposure to the empathic senses of Treecats *may* have helped, there was something there in the first place to work with.
Top
Re: Multi-generational bonding
Post by Annachie   » Wed Oct 05, 2016 1:21 am

Annachie
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 3099
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 7:36 pm

I don't think it's the child bonding, though that no doubt helps, but bonded pregnant women.
It's been stated a few times that cats like children, and from Honor we know that a foetus can be sensed/communicated with to some degree. And the strange tbing about a foetus/baby is how much their brain developes.

With a constant cat, yeah I can see some affect.
Not at the genetic level as posited in the OP, but definately at the developement level

Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You are so going to die. :p ~~~~ runsforcelery
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
still not dead. :)
Top

Return to Honorverse