Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Jonathan_S, Shannon_Foraker and 49 guests

QUESTION ABOUT WEAPON SYSTEMS

Join us in talking discussing all things Honor, including (but not limited to) tactics, favorite characters, and book discussions.
Re: QUESTION ABOUT WEAPON SYSTEMS
Post by Dauntless   » Mon Oct 03, 2016 10:12 am

Dauntless
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1072
Joined: Thu Apr 23, 2015 12:54 pm
Location: United Kingdom

intresting but something you also have to consider is that the Star Knight and Reliant (still being fairly new at the start of the first war) are the closest to modern designs listed there, so as interesting as the info given is it is very dated.

not counting Sd(p) there were at least 2 more designs of SDs, BC(P) and BCL designs replacing the Reliant BC, 3 versions of CA, and I believe four CL designs after the Courageous class.
Top
Re: QUESTION ABOUT WEAPON SYSTEMS
Post by jchilds   » Mon Oct 03, 2016 11:31 am

jchilds
Captain of the List

Posts: 722
Joined: Wed Feb 09, 2011 4:09 am
Location: Ottawa, ON Canada

Re : The fleet train, there's also hospital ships, IIRC. I think there was some mention of Dr. Montoya serving/potentially serving on one somewhere.

There was also the repair ship used as cover for Project Anzio and HMS Minotaur.
Top
Re: QUESTION ABOUT WEAPON SYSTEMS
Post by Jonathan_S   » Mon Oct 03, 2016 12:05 pm

Jonathan_S
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 8792
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 2:01 pm
Location: Virginia, USA

Dauntless wrote:intresting but something you also have to consider is that the Star Knight and Reliant (still being fairly new at the start of the first war) are the closest to modern designs listed there, so as interesting as the info given is it is very dated.

not counting Sd(p) there were at least 2 more designs of SDs, BC(P) and BCL designs replacing the Reliant BC, 3 versions of CA, and I believe four CL designs after the Courageous class.
Yes I know. Unfortunately Jaynes and SITS only cover the pre-war era and only include limited subsets of even those older ships; so we have no energy weapons details (that I'm aware of) for any of the modern designs.
Top
Re: QUESTION ABOUT WEAPON SYSTEMS
Post by MuonNeutrino   » Mon Oct 03, 2016 12:24 pm

MuonNeutrino
Commander

Posts: 167
Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2013 12:40 pm

Jonathan_S wrote:
Dauntless wrote:intresting but something you also have to consider is that the Star Knight and Reliant (still being fairly new at the start of the first war) are the closest to modern designs listed there, so as interesting as the info given is it is very dated.

not counting Sd(p) there were at least 2 more designs of SDs, BC(P) and BCL designs replacing the Reliant BC, 3 versions of CA, and I believe four CL designs after the Courageous class.
Yes I know. Unfortunately Jaynes and SITS only cover the pre-war era and only include limited subsets of even those older ships; so we have no energy weapons details (that I'm aware of) for any of the modern designs.

Still, it gives some decent hints to go on. Unlike missiles, the energy weapons themselves haven't really changed over the course of the series. Ships mount different sizes than they used to, but apart from that and a couple of mostly throwaway lines about grav lensing things don't seem to have changed much. So you can still probably use those sizes as *general* guidelines, i.e. a 'superdreadnought' graser is probably still in the 350-400cm aperture range, it's just that battlecruisers mount them too now.

If overall power scales with aperture area (probably not unreasonable) that makes a DN/SD graser something like 5-8 times as powerful as a CA/BC graser, which is itself roughly 12 times as powerful as a DD/CL graser. Makes it more obvious why Bellerophon was able to so casually vaporize Admiral Pierre's BC divisions!
_______________________________________________________
MuonNeutrino
Astronomer, teacher, gamer, and procrastinator extraordinaire
Top
Re: QUESTION ABOUT WEAPON SYSTEMS
Post by Theemile   » Mon Oct 03, 2016 6:12 pm

Theemile
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5241
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 5:50 pm
Location: All over the Place - Now Serving Dublin, OH

MuonNeutrino wrote:
Jonathan_S wrote:Yes I know. Unfortunately Jaynes and SITS only cover the pre-war era and only include limited subsets of even those older ships; so we have no energy weapons details (that I'm aware of) for any of the modern designs.

Still, it gives some decent hints to go on. Unlike missiles, the energy weapons themselves haven't really changed over the course of the series. Ships mount different sizes than they used to, but apart from that and a couple of mostly throwaway lines about grav lensing things don't seem to have changed much. So you can still probably use those sizes as *general* guidelines, i.e. a 'superdreadnought' graser is probably still in the 350-400cm aperture range, it's just that battlecruisers mount them too now.

If overall power scales with aperture area (probably not unreasonable) that makes a DN/SD graser something like 5-8 times as powerful as a CA/BC graser, which is itself roughly 12 times as powerful as a DD/CL graser. Makes it more obvious why Bellerophon was able to so casually vaporize Admiral Pierre's BC divisions!


There are also mentions in the PRN Jayne's book and the SITS Silesian books that Manty energy weapons were more advanced and compact than other nations. Silesian units actually mounted such lighter mounts, that Manty Destroyers had the same energy batteries as Silesian Heavy Cruisers, and heavy cruisers that of Battlecruisers.
******
RFC said "refitting a Beowulfan SD to Manticoran standards would be just as difficult as refitting a standard SLN SD to those standards. In other words, it would be cheaper and faster to build new ships."
Top
Re: QUESTION ABOUT WEAPON SYSTEMS
Post by munroburton   » Mon Oct 03, 2016 7:14 pm

munroburton
Admiral

Posts: 2375
Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2013 10:16 am
Location: Scotland

MuonNeutrino wrote:
Jonathan_S wrote:Yes I know. Unfortunately Jaynes and SITS only cover the pre-war era and only include limited subsets of even those older ships; so we have no energy weapons details (that I'm aware of) for any of the modern designs.

Still, it gives some decent hints to go on. Unlike missiles, the energy weapons themselves haven't really changed over the course of the series. Ships mount different sizes than they used to, but apart from that and a couple of mostly throwaway lines about grav lensing things don't seem to have changed much. So you can still probably use those sizes as *general* guidelines, i.e. a 'superdreadnought' graser is probably still in the 350-400cm aperture range, it's just that battlecruisers mount them too now.

If overall power scales with aperture area (probably not unreasonable) that makes a DN/SD graser something like 5-8 times as powerful as a CA/BC graser, which is itself roughly 12 times as powerful as a DD/CL graser. Makes it more obvious why Bellerophon was able to so casually vaporize Admiral Pierre's BC divisions!


There's some possibility that the Graysons pushed the size of their SD-range grasers upward, into hithertho unheard-of sizes. All their home-grown SD designs had pure graser armanents just like their BCs. Why not proportionately upscaled like them too?
Top
Re: QUESTION ABOUT WEAPON SYSTEMS
Post by Louis R   » Mon Oct 03, 2016 7:22 pm

Louis R
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1298
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 9:25 pm

Found the cite, for once: " The chase energy weapons of a late-generation SD as of the time of Echoes of Honor are probably somewhere in the 5.5 to 6 meter range. Broadside weapons for the same ship would run in the 4.5 to 5 meter range. Needless to say, both are very destructive.", from http://infodump.thefifthimperium.com/en ... ngton/78/1

munroburton wrote:
MuonNeutrino wrote:Still, it gives some decent hints to go on. Unlike missiles, the energy weapons themselves haven't really changed over the course of the series. Ships mount different sizes than they used to, but apart from that and a couple of mostly throwaway lines about grav lensing things don't seem to have changed much. So you can still probably use those sizes as *general* guidelines, i.e. a 'superdreadnought' graser is probably still in the 350-400cm aperture range, it's just that battlecruisers mount them too now.

If overall power scales with aperture area (probably not unreasonable) that makes a DN/SD graser something like 5-8 times as powerful as a CA/BC graser, which is itself roughly 12 times as powerful as a DD/CL graser. Makes it more obvious why Bellerophon was able to so casually vaporize Admiral Pierre's BC divisions!


There's some possibility that the Graysons pushed the size of their SD-range grasers upward, into hithertho unheard-of sizes. All their home-grown SD designs had pure graser armanents just like their BCs. Why not proportionately upscaled like them too?
Top
Re: QUESTION ABOUT WEAPON SYSTEMS
Post by munroburton   » Mon Oct 03, 2016 8:05 pm

munroburton
Admiral

Posts: 2375
Joined: Sat Jun 15, 2013 10:16 am
Location: Scotland

Louis R wrote:Found the cite, for once: " The chase energy weapons of a late-generation SD as of the time of Echoes of Honor are probably somewhere in the 5.5 to 6 meter range. Broadside weapons for the same ship would run in the 4.5 to 5 meter range. Needless to say, both are very destructive.", from http://infodump.thefifthimperium.com/en ... ngton/78/1


Great spot! I knew there was a 600cm graser somewhere.
Top
Re: QUESTION ABOUT WEAPON SYSTEMS
Post by Cataphract   » Tue Oct 04, 2016 11:25 am

Cataphract
Midshipman

Posts: 9
Joined: Mon May 13, 2013 11:41 am

I knew there was one other item that I forgot.

OK, so beam/energy weapons are retained for close-in fighting, or I suppose should you run out of missiles.

Again I hearken back to Starfire. There, you had 'sprint mode' missiles, that were short ranged, but could not be intercepted by any point defense, and were used along with beam/energy weapons for close ranged combat.

Is something like that feasible in Honorverse?


Thanks again
Jeff
Top
Re: QUESTION ABOUT WEAPON SYSTEMS
Post by Vince   » Tue Oct 04, 2016 12:27 pm

Vince
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1574
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 11:43 pm

Cataphract wrote:I knew there was one other item that I forgot.

OK, so beam/energy weapons are retained for close-in fighting, or I suppose should you run out of missiles.

Again I hearken back to Starfire. There, you had 'sprint mode' missiles, that were short ranged, but could not be intercepted by any point defense, and were used along with beam/energy weapons for close ranged combat.

Is something like that feasible in Honorverse?


Thanks again
Jeff

No.

The closest thing to a Starfire sprint mode attack missile in the Honorverse is an attack missile with a counter-missile drive, which is still able to able to intercepted by point defense.
-------------------------------------------------------------
History does not repeat itself so much as it echoes.
Top

Return to Honorverse