Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 77 guests

SoV eARC errors edits and spoilers

Join us in talking discussing all things Honor, including (but not limited to) tactics, favorite characters, and book discussions.
Re: SoV eARC errors edits and spoilers
Post by SpacecadetChimpy   » Tue Sep 06, 2016 3:07 am

SpacecadetChimpy
Midshipman

Posts: 2
Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2016 2:52 am

Salutations!

Found quite a large continuity error regarding Paulo d"Arezzo in the eARC.

Chapter Sixty Six (August 1922 PD)
Paulo d'Arezzo is on Montana, Task Force 10.2.9 leaves Golem.

Chapter Seventy-One (September 1922 PD)
Paulo d'Arezzo is with TF10.2.9 in Wloclawek.
Top
Re: SoV eARC errors edits and spoilers
Post by saber964   » Wed Sep 07, 2016 4:11 pm

saber964
Admiral

Posts: 2423
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 8:41 pm
Location: Spokane WA USA

SpacecadetChimpy wrote:Salutations!

Found quite a large continuity error regarding Paulo d"Arezzo in the eARC.

Chapter Sixty Six (August 1922 PD)
Paulo d'Arezzo is on Montana, Task Force 10.2.9 leaves Golem.

Chapter Seventy-One (September 1922 PD)
Paulo d'Arezzo is with TF10.2.9 in Wloclawek.



Why is this an error Paulo could be transferring from one system to the next. Do we know the distance between each system it could take several weeks to transit between systems.
Top
Re: SoV eARC errors edits and spoilers
Post by lyonheart   » Wed Sep 21, 2016 9:06 am

lyonheart
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4853
Joined: Tue Sep 08, 2009 11:27 pm

Hi all

Not to pile on, but this thread was the first I noticed so if it helps or someone else spotted it, please disregard.

There are 16 member systems in the Talbot Quadrant not a dozen as the SoV says explaining how they came up with so many ground troops.

L
Any snippet or post from RFC is good if not great!
Top
Re: SoV eARC errors edits and spoilers
Post by Peregrinator   » Sun Sep 25, 2016 4:34 pm

Peregrinator
Commander

Posts: 179
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 9:50 pm

Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe this is an error (p. 437 of the RTF edition):

Tanawat and Sirada Saowaluk were both first-generation prolong recipients in their early eighties
Top
Re: SoV eARC errors edits and spoilers
Post by Louis R   » Tue Sep 27, 2016 10:55 am

Louis R
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1298
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 9:25 pm

Nope.

The confusion is understandable, however. You need to read this:

http://infodump.thefifthimperium.com/en ... ngton/25/1

Peregrinator wrote:Correct me if I'm wrong, but I believe this is an error (p. 437 of the RTF edition):

Tanawat and Sirada Saowaluk were both first-generation prolong recipients in their early eighties
Top
Re: SoV eARC errors edits and spoilers
Post by Peregrinator   » Wed Sep 28, 2016 10:51 am

Peregrinator
Commander

Posts: 179
Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2014 9:50 pm

Louis R wrote:Nope.

The confusion is understandable, however. You need to read this:

http://infodump.thefifthimperium.com/en ... ngton/25/1

I see now what the issue is. I read this as "they were both people who received prolong treatments in their early 80s" rather than "they were both people in their 80s who received prolong treatments." The ambiguities of the English language!
Top

Return to Honorverse