Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 29 guests

"Obsolete SDs" Waste not...

Join us in talking discussing all things Honor, including (but not limited to) tactics, favorite characters, and book discussions.
Re: "Obsolete SDs" Waste not...
Post by Somtaaw   » Sun Sep 18, 2016 8:59 am

Somtaaw
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1204
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2014 11:36 am
Location: Canada

It says it in plain language, Rollins detoured to double-check the net for Hancock right in the books. It didn't specify he snuck in to check it, but I inferred that because prior to the Hancock strike, they were sending singleton light cruisers in on week long ballistic stealth runs to pick up the data, Rollins with his multiple wallers also had to sneak.

Short Victorious War, Ch 29 wrote:Which should still be more than adequate, for one thing was certain: the delay to query the Argus net's latest data had confirmed that Parks wasn't here now. The platforms didn't have the reach to see anything within ten light-minutes or so of the primary, but they would certainly have noted anything that came in far enough out to clear Hancock's hyper limit, and nothing heavier than a cruiser had.


Ok, so they actually did note the arrival of additional cruisers, but the bolded bit shows he could have arrived at Hancock earlier, if he hadn't delayed to check. And Manticore wouldn't have thought he was checking any sensor net, because until one of Parks' screening destroyers literally stumbled into a cruiser in Yorik just two chapters earlier, NOBODY expected Haven to have anything like it, let alone have the balls to do it.

But just a few paragraphs after my above quote, same chapter
Chin's task group would more than suffice to eliminate any Manty battlecruisers—and their base—and if it turned out after all that this was some sort of subtle trap, he refused to let it close upon the core of his task force's true fighting power.


Even if he'd detected a single division of dreadnought's arriving, Rollins still might have sent Chin's squadron in alone, because his three superdreadnought's were his true fighting force and he didn't want to risk losing it on an elaborate trap.


Louis R wrote:Where on earth did you get the idea that Rollins had to detour to check the net, or that he had to do any sort of sneaking to do so?

Well, I guess it could be argued that he detoured, since he came in 35lm out instead of the 20 or so that would comfortably clear the hyperlimit. But he most certainly wasn't sneaky about it. In fact, if the Manties has been given long enough, they might even have deduced that the delay after arrival that they were scratching their heads over was to query some sort of reconnaissance system. Hard to say, since it would have been something of a leap. That, however, is neither here nor there - the key point is that he came in to the system at a location where he could query Argus to see if anything had changed, and did so. And, according to SVW "the delay to query the Argus net's latest data had confirmed that Parks wasn't here now. The platforms didn't have the reach to see anything within ten light-minutes or so of the primary, but they would certainly have noted anything that came in far enough out to clear Hancock's hyper limit, and nothing heavier than a cruiser had." Which means I don't quite get how you think that any number of DNs could have snuck into the system, either.

Somtaaw wrote:Rollins moved when he thought everything else had left. Danislav arrived with a 10 ship strong squadron, reinforced by an extra division Manticore managed to scare up before Danislav departed. That single division could also have been sent on ahead, arriving before Danislav, and quite possibly even before Rollins. Which actually would have meant Rollins couldn't have known until he arrived and checked the sensor net prior to his "big" arrival.

Which actually is one of those things that glossed over, they were sending single light cruisers out to check them, and they had to come coasting in for days just to get close.... but Rollins took 3 squadrons of SD's, a squadron each of DN and BC + full screen. And NOBODY spotted that hyper event prior to them arriving on a "least-time course from Seaford Nine", despite that detour to check the Argus net?

Aside from that glaring plot hole, if Rollins could have gotten close enough to query the Argus net without being detected, a single division of DN's could have arrived early and been missed by the Argus net, leading to Chin being sent on ahead as planned. The end force actually wouldn't have changed, Danislav had 10 DN's when he arrived in the books, if the extra's had arrived early, Task Group Hancock-001 would have had 2 DN's in order of battle, plus Danislav would have arrived with 8 for a total of 10.

And in this timeline, Rollins actually would have gotten screwed because when he realized 2 DN's had ambushed Chin's 8, he would immediately have started moving to assist and been deep in the Hancock gravity well when Admiral Parks showed up. Instead of having already gone to maxium evasion when Danislav arrives and hypered out just before Parks could engage him.

This chain of events would have reverted back to the book plot timeline. Parks plus Danislav would still have moved on the weak Seaford to crush it, returned back to Hancock (and coincidentally encountering Coatsworth thinking Rollins holds the system) and book plot continues on with Field of Dishonor.

Top
Re: "Obsolete SDs" Waste not...
Post by Jonathan_S   » Sun Sep 18, 2016 10:08 am

Jonathan_S
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 8796
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 2:01 pm
Location: Virginia, USA

Somtaaw wrote:It says it in plain language, Rollins detoured to double-check the net for Hancock right in the books. It didn't specify he snuck in to check it, but I inferred that because prior to the Hancock strike, they were sending singleton light cruisers in on week long ballistic stealth runs to pick up the data, Rollins with his multiple wallers also had to sneak.

Short Victorious War, Ch 29 wrote:Which should still be more than adequate, for one thing was certain: the delay to query the Argus net's latest data had confirmed that Parks wasn't here now. The platforms didn't have the reach to see anything within ten light-minutes or so of the primary, but they would certainly have noted anything that came in far enough out to clear Hancock's hyper limit, and nothing heavier than a cruiser had.

Actually it says he "delayed" not "detoured". I believe that delay was the one mentioned in the previous chapter -
Short Victorious War, Ch 28 wrote:"The outer sensor net's just reported a hyper footprint, Ma'am—a big one, about thirty-five light-minutes out from the primary. It's right on the mark for a least-time approach from Seaford."

[...]

Sarnow's green eyes switched back to Chandler. "Do we have a projected vector for them, Commander?"
"Not yet, Sir. They made a very low-velocity transit, and they've been sitting more or less at rest relative to the primary ever since."
"At that range?" The admiral's eyebrows arched, and he and Honor regarded one another with surprised speculation. No shipboard sensor could see Hancock's inner system from that range, so what were the Peeps waiting for? Assuming they didn't know about the FTL sensor net, they should have started building the highest velocity they could before light-speed transmissions from the out-system sensor platforms warned the defenders of their arrival.
Though I guess it's something of a matter of opinion as to whether dropping out of hyper 10+ LM early, on a direct line flight path, is a detour or not. Certainly, once having done so, sitting at rest relative to the primary while waiting for Argus net reports to filter in from around the periphery is a delay (or an additional delay)


Once he had the latest info from Argus, including the paucity of Hancock's remaining defenders, he detached his relatively quicker DNs to deal with them. The only tricky thing about his trip to Hancock is that he slipped 6 CLs (under Ogilve in PNS Napoleon) out early to bounce from hyper on the 3 RMN CLs dispatched from Hancock to picket him. Knocking those out deprived Hancock of early warning of his approach.
Top
Re: "Obsolete SDs" Waste not...
Post by Sigs   » Sun Sep 18, 2016 10:29 am

Sigs
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1485
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2015 6:09 pm

Weird Harold wrote:
Sigs wrote:But you are missing the point because these ships are both powerful weapons platforms and obsolete targets, just depends who is controlling them. If it is the SLN they are obsolete targets because the GA has much better equipment, but if it is the GA's allies its a whole different story because they would be facing equal or worse equipment from the League.


No, I'm NOT missing the point.

IMHO, the captured SLN SDs have the reputation of powerful weapons platforms, but the reality of wooden square-riggers in a post-Dreadnought world. Especially in the hands of Battle Fleet crews.

Gifted to systems without existing SDFs and the infrastructure to maintain and supply such manpower intensive dinosaurs, they won't be much more effective.

Gifted to a very few systems with exceptional military leaders, and OJT Crew with a couple of months to shakedown, might be competitive with a Battle Fleet crew.

Everyone buys into the SLN's reputation for having the best warships in human space, but RFC has shown us glimpses of poor training, poor maintenance, poor readiness, and a host of other Battle Fleet failings. The inflated reputation of SLN SDs is part of the same set of "Emperor's New Cloths" typified by the Fleet 2000 upgrades.



In this case they are the best warships because they are equal to the SLN ships.

Giving them to core and shell worlds who might have poorly trained crews that are otherwise technologically competent is the best course of action since those systems will need to build their own fleets up in a hurry.

These platforms won't be expected to last more than 5-10 years before they start being replaced by domestically build ships or alliance export version ships. The job they are expected to do is provide core worlds a training platform for their crew's, give them experience operating real warships, build their infrastructure to maintain and supply warships etc... The real defence would at least in the immediate future come from the GA in the form of LAC's, missile pods and pickets to those systems deemed to be in danger of reprisals.

If the newly independent core systems don't want those SD's it wouldn't make sense because they wouldn't be able to build anything better for a few years anyway and this way you have a fleet that's getting experience and building infrastructure rather than waiting to get the new warships to start from scratch even though if those new ships are domestically build they would still be equal to the SLN's ships anyway.
Top
Re: "Obsolete SDs" Waste not...
Post by Eagleeye   » Sun Sep 18, 2016 10:52 am

Eagleeye
Commodore

Posts: 750
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 4:41 am
Location: Halle/Saale, Germany

All systems who are able to maintain SDs already have SDs in their SDFs. And I doubt, that these systems are willing to pay money for vessels who have proven to be insufficient in a modern war. Instead they want the most modern ships they can lay their hands on. Say, something around BC(P)s or modern CAs. Vessels, they can easily work with and have a chance to man and maintain (with help by the sellers they bought from - Manticore, Haven, Erewhon). Like the Maya-Sector. But the Maya-Sector is a special case, because Maya most definitely can maintain their new SD(P)s, because of their treaty with Erewhon. And because they have the economic power to support such a navy.

Systems without SDs don't want them. Mostly because they can't man them sufficiently, but also because they most probably don't have the logistics to maintain them. After all: who would sell them missiles, after the one in the magazines (assuming Manticore let them there at all) are used? Or other parts you have to change regularly to make sure the SDs are remaining in something similar to a working condition? Manticore? I think not. Why should they? And, by the way, if Manticore really would intend to sell SDs at all, why should they sell such crap? Instead of their own Gryphon- or King Williams-Class SDs? Which are battle proven and predictably better than Scientists or Vegas?
Last edited by Eagleeye on Sun Sep 18, 2016 11:53 am, edited 1 time in total.
Top
Re: "Obsolete SDs" Waste not...
Post by svenhauke   » Sun Sep 18, 2016 11:27 am

svenhauke
Lieutenant (Senior Grade)

Posts: 89
Joined: Fri Jul 11, 2014 7:36 pm

i thought my idea giving 8 SD to meyers showed what i was thinking of :

1. bluff solarian leage FF BC, no squadron or 3 of FF BC wants to tangle with a squadron of ANY SD

get your wedge up go out they run

2. thats a great opportunity to train your navy, the nonexisting one

you will need sailors and officers, so you scratch up what you got and train on the job, no fighting intended for the next 4 years. and 8 SD have space for 64 000 trainees

3. they are basicly free, you get them at scrap value
theres enough spares for them to go 10 years, so your space industrie can start builduing up by serving those SD

great training again#

4. missiles, i don t know how many of those simple dual drive catharpths are left but the fleet train should have enough for 2-3 reloads for 8 SD of normal single drive
+ spares to keep 8going for 10 years.

5. i actually don t know any other starsystem id give solly SD

and meyers is not like a 3d world country more like a 2nd world country under occupation

they got 300 000 people on a moon, all of them capable to survive in space ..

btw didn t fialatra have 400 000 SLN space marines ? if 10% got battle armor thats 40 000 battle armor, where do you use that ?
Top
Re: "Obsolete SDs" Waste not...
Post by Sigs   » Sun Sep 18, 2016 12:19 pm

Sigs
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1485
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2015 6:09 pm

Eagleeye wrote:All systems who are able to maintain SDs already have SDs in their SDFs. And I doubt, that these sytems are willing to pay money for vessels who have proven to be insufficient in a modern war. Instead they want the most modern ships they can lay their hands on. Say, something around BC(P)s or modern CAs. Vessels, they can easily work with and have a chance to man and maintain (with help by the sellers they bought from - Manticore, Haven, Erewhon). Like the Maya-Sector. But the Maya-Sector is a special case, because Maya most definitely can maintain their new SD(P)s, because of their treaty with Erewhon. And because they have the economic power to support such a navy.

Systems without SDs don't want them. Mostly because they can't man them sufficiently, but also because they most probably don't have the logistics to maintain them. After all: who would sell them missiles, after the one in the magazines (assuming Manticore let them there at all) are used? Or other parts you have to change regularly to make sure the SDs are remaining in something similar to a working condition? Manticore? I think not. Why should they? And, by the way, if Manticore really would intend to sell SDs at all, why should they sell such crap? Instead of their own Gryphon- or King Williams-Class SDs? Which are battle proven and predictably better than Scientists or Vegas?



Very few systems have SDF's worth mentioning if at all when compared to the entire league yet a lot of systems will be looking to build up their defences.

Manticore and the GA will not be giving out their obsolete ships to just anyone because even though they are obsolete by GA standards they still have a lot of the technologies that if reverse engineered can cut R and D for the league, RF, MA or anyone looking to create an empire down significantly.

And a better question is if you cannot maintain an ex-SLN SD why would Manticore or Haven give you one of their own obsolete vessels?

The GA will help them set up their infrastructure and domestic munitions production as well as maintenance facilities because it is beneficial to the GA to do so but it is most definitely not in their best interest to be giving out their old equipment to just anyone at least until those new nations have proven their intentions and desires to the GA. You give ex-SLN ships only to those who already have the industrial muscle to build the infrastructure to support those ships rather than giving them to some backwoods system that has no industry to speak of and whose education system does not even approach the minimum required to men those ships.


As I said before, something is better than nothing and the ex-SLN ships are all technologically equal to what the SLN is fielding and with some minor improvements might even be better.

As for munitions? The GA can scrape together missile pods of equal capabilities to the SLN pods.

The main defence for those systems that get the ex-SLN ships would be the GA but this would give them the ability to build their own capabilities so that 5 years down the road they can be self sufficient fleet wise.
Top
Re: "Obsolete SDs" Waste not...
Post by Somtaaw   » Sun Sep 18, 2016 12:26 pm

Somtaaw
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1204
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2014 11:36 am
Location: Canada

Jonathan_S wrote:Though I guess it's something of a matter of opinion as to whether dropping out of hyper 10+ LM early, on a direct line flight path, is a detour or not. Certainly, once having done so, sitting at rest relative to the primary while waiting for Argus net reports to filter in from around the periphery is a delay (or an additional delay)


Once he had the latest info from Argus, including the paucity of Hancock's remaining defenders, he detached his relatively quicker DNs to deal with them. The only tricky thing about his trip to Hancock is that he slipped 6 CLs (under Ogilve in PNS Napoleon) out early to bounce from hyper on the 3 RMN CLs dispatched from Hancock to picket him. Knocking those out deprived Hancock of early warning of his approach.


I'll accept the quibble that Rollins purely delayed his arrival to Hancock instead of a detour. I think it was a detour because his arrival was 35 LM out. And Hancock's an M5, which puts the hyperlimit at 11 LM, so he came out at nearly three times what he had to.

In the end, he stopped his superdreadnoughts on the hyperlimit itself for ages, which he traveled using only 1 point something KPS squared to Chin's 2 KPS^2 acceleration (that's almost slow enough they could have used ECM, but thats for another thread). The SD's had only barely started into the hyper limit before Danislav arrived and he freaked out and went to maximum deceleration (technically acceleration since he went exactly 180 instead of a 90 degree chord cut to get back out of the hyperlimit)
Top
Re: "Obsolete SDs" Waste not...
Post by Jonathan_S   » Sun Sep 18, 2016 12:30 pm

Jonathan_S
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 8796
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 2:01 pm
Location: Virginia, USA

Eagleeye wrote:All systems who are able to maintain SDs already have SDs in their SDFs. And I doubt, that these systems are willing to pay money for vessels who have proven to be insufficient in a modern war. Instead they want the most modern ships they can lay their hands on. Say, something around BC(P)s or modern CAs. Vessels, they can easily work with and have a chance to man and maintain (with help by the sellers they bought from - Manticore, Haven, Erewhon). Like the Maya-Sector. But the Maya-Sector is a special case, because Maya most definitely can maintain their new SD(P)s, because of their treaty with Erewhon. And because they have the economic power to support such a navy.

Systems without SDs don't want them. Mostly because they can't man them sufficiently, but also because they most probably don't have the logistics to maintain them. After all: who would sell them missiles, after the one in the magazines (assuming Manticore let them there at all) are used? Or other parts you have to change regularly to make sure the SDs are remaining in something similar to a working condition? Manticore? I think not. Why should they? And, by the way, if Manticore really would intend to sell SDs at all, why should they sell such crap? Instead of their own Gryphon- or King Williams-Class SDs? Which are battle proven and predictably better than Scientists or Vegas?

There are probably a handful of individual exceptions; for example some systems with nothing bigger than a BC in their SDF (because they previously felt that was sufficient for their security) might be able to fairly quickly scale up their support infrastructure to handle SDs. (At least assuming they already had service / repair yards for them. If they purchased their BCs from an outside yard and contracted all major maintenance then they'd also be in a pickle if they lost the relationship with that other system's yard)

But somebody who only had LACs (which is apparently far more common) would be very unlikely to develop the skills and infrastructure to maintain SDs within even a few years. (And given the ease which which LACs can be freighted about seem even more likely to have had all major maintenance done back at the yard they'd purchased them from)

So you're probably fairly correct - most systems that lack SDs also lack the ability to service or maintain SDs. (And even some systems with an SD squadron or two might not normally build them or perform major yard maintenance on them)



Still I'm of the opinion that there likely will be at least a few systems that'll want those old SDs. And as long as you're sure they won't go commit atrocities on their neighbors with them I'd be perfectly happy for Manticore to unload them. (Even if they suspect the system won't be able to keep up the maintenance)
Top
Re: "Obsolete SDs" Waste not...
Post by Sigs   » Sun Sep 18, 2016 2:25 pm

Sigs
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1485
Joined: Mon Mar 16, 2015 6:09 pm

Jonathan_S wrote:There are probably a handful of individual exceptions; for example some systems with nothing bigger than a BC in their SDF (because they previously felt that was sufficient for their security) might be able to fairly quickly scale up their support infrastructure to handle SDs. (At least assuming they already had service / repair yards for them. If they purchased their BCs from an outside yard and contracted all major maintenance then they'd also be in a pickle if they lost the relationship with that other system's yard)

But somebody who only had LACs (which is apparently far more common) would be very unlikely to develop the skills and infrastructure to maintain SDs within even a few years. (And given the ease which which LACs can be freighted about seem even more likely to have had all major maintenance done back at the yard they'd purchased them from)

So you're probably fairly correct - most systems that lack SDs also lack the ability to service or maintain SDs. (And even some systems with an SD squadron or two might not normally build them or perform major yard maintenance on them)



Still I'm of the opinion that there likely will be at least a few systems that'll want those old SDs. And as long as you're sure they won't go commit atrocities on their neighbors with them I'd be perfectly happy for Manticore to unload them. (Even if they suspect the system won't be able to keep up the maintenance)



Look at Grayson as an example, they went from a fleet made of obsolete cruisers and destroyers to a fleet of SD's in a relatively short time. Admittedly they had a lot of help from Manticore but they also started far behind technologically and industrially then most core and shell worlds if not all of them. Many of the core and shell worlds as mentioned by the mandarins have the means to build respectable fleets if motivated properly and what better motivation than the disintegration of the SLN and the disappearance of their security.

Those SD's are there to provide the core around which a fleet will be build and to be essentially a bicycle with training wheels, you learn how to operate the ships, learn how to operate as a force, build the infrastructure and training system etc... And to be fair Manticore has experience building up its allies from nothing to a useful and competent fleet. And most of those allies were at best a third world country compared to a core or a shell world.
Top
Re: "Obsolete SDs" Waste not...
Post by Castenea   » Sun Sep 18, 2016 3:07 pm

Castenea
Captain of the List

Posts: 671
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2012 5:21 pm
Location: MD

Sigs wrote:
Jonathan_S wrote:There are probably a handful of individual exceptions; for example some systems with nothing bigger than a BC in their SDF (because they previously felt that was sufficient for their security) might be able to fairly quickly scale up their support infrastructure to handle SDs. (At least assuming they already had service / repair yards for them. If they purchased their BCs from an outside yard and contracted all major maintenance then they'd also be in a pickle if they lost the relationship with that other system's yard)

But somebody who only had LACs (which is apparently far more common) would be very unlikely to develop the skills and infrastructure to maintain SDs within even a few years. (And given the ease which which LACs can be freighted about seem even more likely to have had all major maintenance done back at the yard they'd purchased them from)

So you're probably fairly correct - most systems that lack SDs also lack the ability to service or maintain SDs. (And even some systems with an SD squadron or two might not normally build them or perform major yard maintenance on them)



Still I'm of the opinion that there likely will be at least a few systems that'll want those old SDs. And as long as you're sure they won't go commit atrocities on their neighbors with them I'd be perfectly happy for Manticore to unload them. (Even if they suspect the system won't be able to keep up the maintenance)



Look at Grayson as an example, they went from a fleet made of obsolete cruisers and destroyers to a fleet of SD's in a relatively short time. Admittedly they had a lot of help from Manticore but they also started far behind technologically and industrially then most core and shell worlds if not all of them. Many of the core and shell worlds as mentioned by the mandarins have the means to build respectable fleets if motivated properly and what better motivation than the disintegration of the SLN and the disappearance of their security.

Those SD's are there to provide the core around which a fleet will be build and to be essentially a bicycle with training wheels, you learn how to operate the ships, learn how to operate as a force, build the infrastructure and training system etc... And to be fair Manticore has experience building up its allies from nothing to a useful and competent fleet. And most of those allies were at best a third world country compared to a core or a shell world.

Actually Erewhon would be a better example than Grayson. Erewhon had SDs in it's navy in the first Haven war, and only started building the facilities to build their own ships during the second. We have text ev that prior to the build up to the first Havenite war, Erewhon bought their ships from the league, and shifted to buying their ships from Manticore during the buildup.

Grayson took well over a decade to build a Modern Haven sector navy from near scratch, during which time they were both heavily subsidized and highly motivated. Also they had Manticore providing security while they did so, because Grayson was in a strategic location.

I find the likelihood of heavy subsidies and tech transfers to systems contemplating, or recently seceded from the SL to be unlikely in all but a few cases (and Beowulf already has the tech).
Top

Return to Honorverse