Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Jonathan_S, Shannon_Foraker and 46 guests

Discussions on raiding...

Join us in talking discussing all things Honor, including (but not limited to) tactics, favorite characters, and book discussions.
Re: Discussions on raiding...
Post by Weird Harold   » Wed Sep 14, 2016 3:21 pm

Weird Harold
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4478
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2014 10:25 pm
Location: "Lost Wages", NV

kzt wrote:... Similarly, an orbital bombardment attack on the basic economic or industrial infrastructure of the planet would not be justifiable under the terms of the Edict, nor would a "demonstration strike" on a population center intended to terrify the rest of the planetary population into submission.


So basically anything Masada did or was willing to do to Grayson?
.
.
.
Answers! I got lots of answers!

(Now if I could just find the right questions.)
Top
Re: Discussions on raiding...
Post by noblehunter   » Wed Sep 14, 2016 3:41 pm

noblehunter
Captain (Junior Grade)

Posts: 385
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2015 8:49 pm

So, they had control of the orbitals and the defenders weren't going to be taking them away any time soon.

They didn't call upon the defenders to surrender, though their fig leaf seems to be that the "legitimate" government of the planet requested the strikes. I'm sure the record will show calls to surrender were rejected prior to the bombardment if there needs to be.

Military targets? Well, I'm sure those towns were infested with rebel fighters. Urban combat remains a meat grinder in the Honorverse. Terrorists can't purchase immunity from orbital bombardment by using human shields, the loss of civilian life was regrettable but necessary. They also had co-opted the municipal infrastructure to coordinate their forces.

Against a GA planet, they can't secure the orbitals, they can't make a credible request for surrender, nor can they even pick out specific targets.
Top
Re: Discussions on raiding...
Post by Jonathan_S   » Wed Sep 14, 2016 3:58 pm

Jonathan_S
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 8792
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 2:01 pm
Location: Virginia, USA

noblehunter wrote:So, they had control of the orbitals and the defenders weren't going to be taking them away any time soon.

They didn't call upon the defenders to surrender, though their fig leaf seems to be that the "legitimate" government of the planet requested the strikes. I'm sure the record will show calls to surrender were rejected prior to the bombardment if there needs to be.

Military targets? Well, I'm sure those towns were infested with rebel fighters. Urban combat remains a meat grinder in the Honorverse. Terrorists can't purchase immunity from orbital bombardment by using human shields, the loss of civilian life was regrettable but necessary. They also had co-opted the municipal infrastructure to coordinate their forces.

Against a GA planet, they can't secure the orbitals, they can't make a credible request for surrender, nor can they even pick out specific targets.

I had to edit my draft post because you got this in while I was writing it up. Like you I assume those technicalities prevented the OFS bombardments from being EE violations were:

But one you didn't specifically address is that they weren't bombarding in order to convince the planetary government and official military to surrender. (Which seems to be the specific purpose of the EE - If you choose to perform a hostile landing before demanding a surrender you seem to be allowed to use orbital fire support to assist your assault shuttles in surviving their approach.
And the FF force bombardment is at least arguable providing fire support to on-planet military formations tasked with recapturing rebel territory.

Now I'd still say that none of the factors we brought up in any way morally justify their unannounced bombardment of rebel communities; even though they appear to void technical violation of the EE. It's still grossly disproportionate and I would certainly hope that that level of bombardment - even under orders of a friendly government - would violate other parts of the Solarian League Navy official rules of war or code of military justice.

Weird Harold wrote:
kzt wrote:... Similarly, an orbital bombardment attack on the basic economic or industrial infrastructure of the planet would not be justifiable under the terms of the Edict, nor would a "demonstration strike" on a population center intended to terrify the rest of the planetary population into submission.


So basically anything Masada did or was willing to do to Grayson?
Yes. I seem to recall RFC even said that if Grayson had been in contact with the rest of the universe at the time of the previous war with Masada - when they did perform demonstration nuclear bombardment - that they could have called on the SLN to enforce the edict.

But since they were still 'lost' at that point that they didn't have the ability, or knowledge, to do that.
Top
Re: Discussions on raiding...
Post by Somtaaw   » Wed Sep 14, 2016 6:08 pm

Somtaaw
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1203
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2014 11:36 am
Location: Canada

Jonathan_S wrote:I had to edit my draft post because you got this in while I was writing it up. Like you I assume those technicalities prevented the OFS bombardments from being EE violations were:

But one you didn't specifically address is that they weren't bombarding in order to convince the planetary government and official military to surrender. (Which seems to be the specific purpose of the EE - If you choose to perform a hostile landing before demanding a surrender you seem to be allowed to use orbital fire support to assist your assault shuttles in surviving their approach.
And the FF force bombardment is at least arguable providing fire support to on-planet military formations tasked with recapturing rebel territory.

Now I'd still say that none of the factors we brought up in any way morally justify their unannounced bombardment of rebel communities; even though they appear to void technical violation of the EE. It's still grossly disproportionate and I would certainly hope that that level of bombardment - even under orders of a friendly government - would violate other parts of the Solarian League Navy official rules of war or code of military justice.


I think most of what OFS does, in regards to possible/probable EE violations falls under "violating the spirit, while respecting the wording" violations.

So OFS going ahead and bombing the crap out of civilians, such as in Loomis, during the very opening chapters of Shadow of Freedom

The drone paused, motionless, blacker than the night about it, its rain-slick, light-absorbent coat sucking in the photons from the smudgy fires which might otherwise have reflected from it. The turret mounted on its bottom rotated smoothly, turning sensors and lenses towards whatever had attracted its attention. Wind sighed wearily in the branches of sugar pine, crab poplar, and imported Terran white pine and hickory, something shifted in one of the piles of rubble, throwing up sparks and cinders. A burning rafter burned through and collapsed and water dripped from rain-heavy limbs with the patient, uncaring persistence of nature, but otherwise all was still, silent.

The drone considered the sensor data coming to it, decided it was worth consideration by higher authority, and uploaded it to the communications satellite and its operator in far distant Elgin City. Then it waited.

-snipping-

“Unauthorized movement in an interdicted zone, Ma’am,” he replied.

“And you needed a KEW to deal with it?” The lieutenant arched one eyebrow. “A near-deer, do you think? Or possibly a bison elk?”

“IR signature was human, Ma’am. Must’ve been one of MacRory’s bastards, or he wouldn’t’ve been there.”

“I see.” The UPS officer folded her hands behind her. “As it happens, I was standing right over there at the command desk,” she observed, this time with a distinct bite. “If I recall correctly, SOP is to clear a KEW strike with command personnel unless it’s time-critical. Am I mistaken about that?”

-snipping-
“And did they happen to tell us what it was they wanted us to kill this time? Or if we got it?”

“No, Ma’am. Just the coordinates. Could’ve been one of their own battalions, for all I know. And no strike assessment, so far.” And there won’t be one, either…as usual, his expression added silently.

-snipping-
Back in the shattered ruins which had once been a village named Glen mo Chrìdhe, the sound of rain was overlaid by the heavier patter of falling debris. It lasted for several seconds, sparks bouncing and rolling through the wet as some of the still-burning wreckage struck, and then things were still once more. The crater was dozens of meters across, deep enough to swallow an air lorry…and more than enough to devour the cellar into which the thirteen-year-old boy had just darted with the food he’d been able to scavenge for his younger sister.



Dropping KEW's on possible ghost reports, without first checking with superiors, and then even calling on the suspect to stand-down, like Terekhov did when speaking to Yucel... that feels to me very much like a spirit violation while just barely toeing the wording limitations.
Top
Re: Discussions on raiding...
Post by Somtaaw   » Wed Sep 14, 2016 6:14 pm

Somtaaw
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1203
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2014 11:36 am
Location: Canada

Jonathan_S wrote:
Weird Harold wrote:
So basically anything Masada did or was willing to do to Grayson?
Yes. I seem to recall RFC even said that if Grayson had been in contact with the rest of the universe at the time of the previous war with Masada - when they did perform demonstration nuclear bombardment - that they could have called on the SLN to enforce the edict.

But since they were still 'lost' at that point that they didn't have the ability, or knowledge, to do that.


Masada doing demonstration nuclear orbital strikes on a non-surrendering planetary target doesn't quite feel like a EE violation, at first glance. If they weren't totally insane, I'd assume they'd have started with strikes against purely military targets, but Masada wouldn't care if they were breaking EE violations because their God doesn't care what heretic's laws Masadans must break to achieve His Will.

However, Masada has also stated, as mentioned in HotQ, that they are perfectly willing to totally annihilate Grayson if that's what it takes to make them stop 'perverting' the Church of Grayson. And since they're totally insane, and even stole the Thunder, knowing it would piss Haven off to no end... they literally wouldn't believe they were risking Masada being nuked to Hell behind them.
Top
Re: Discussions on raiding...
Post by Jonathan_S   » Wed Sep 14, 2016 6:54 pm

Jonathan_S
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 8792
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 2:01 pm
Location: Virginia, USA

Somtaaw wrote:Masada doing demonstration nuclear orbital strikes on a non-surrendering planetary target doesn't quite feel like a EE violation, at first glance. If they weren't totally insane, I'd assume they'd have started with strikes against purely military targets, but Masada wouldn't care if they were breaking EE violations because their God doesn't care what heretic's laws Masadans must break to achieve His Will.

However, Masada has also stated, as mentioned in HotQ, that they are perfectly willing to totally annihilate Grayson if that's what it takes to make them stop 'perverting' the Church of Grayson. And since they're totally insane, and even stole the Thunder, knowing it would piss Haven off to no end... they literally wouldn't believe they were risking Masada being nuked to Hell behind them.
Hard to say.
Since Masada ultimately lost that war, and Grayson's fleet would have almost certainly been in-system, I don't think in that war 35 years before HotQ Masada would have met the prerequisites for full control of the orbitals leaving the planet with "no immediate prospect of relief".

Masada may have gotten a raiding squadron past the GSN, but unless they can hold the orbitals they're not allowed to bombard with WMDs.

It seems to me that if they'd fought their way past the GSN to the orbitals they'd have been able to destroy the shipyards - at which point they've won unless their economy collapses trying to maintain a blockading squadron before a) Grayson surrenders, or b) they get bored and nuke them into surrendering in full compliance with the Eridani Edict.
Since that didn't happen, and the GSN had no other place for most of their ships to be, I think we can safely assume that the planet was quickly relieved and the bombarding Masadan ships driven off or destroyed.


But assuming I'm wrong and the Masadans did have the planet for long enough no prospect of its relief. They're then allowed to demand surrender, and attempt to compel it via application of WMDs - but only against specific target lists. A quick search through HotQ for "nuclear" didn't turn up their targeting list for the prior war beyond the vague "planetary targets" in the statement from Honor "At the same time, Masada used nuclear weapons against planetary targets thirty-five years ago and has repeatedly stated its willingness to do so again."
However the orders, that she foiled, for the Thunder of God included the use of "demonstration nuclear strikes on their less important cities" -- which on the face appears a direct violation of the targeting rules of the Eridani Edict (unless all those "less important cities" happened to contain legitimate targets from limited allowed target categories)
If they're willing to perform terror targeting now, when the conflict is more in the galactic eye I have trouble believing that they were more circumspect back when nobody involved knew of the Eridani Edict and it's rules.

So I'd judge that Masada likely did violate the Eridani Edict in that prior war.
Top
Re: Discussions on raiding...
Post by Duckk   » Wed Sep 14, 2016 8:50 pm

Duckk
Site Admin

Posts: 4200
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:29 pm

-------------------------
Shields at 50%, taunting at 100%! - Tom Pope
Top
Re: Discussions on raiding...
Post by WeirdlyWired   » Fri Sep 16, 2016 4:46 am

WeirdlyWired
Captain of the List

Posts: 487
Joined: Thu Sep 01, 2016 1:08 pm
Location: 35 NW center of nowhere.

Annachie wrote:From memory, the possibility of an EE strike was heavily discussed a few years ago. But that was more the MAlign using them.

I think that is also where the RFC quote came from.

Summary, if the MAlign went to the trouble of using the spider ships and avoiding outright EE violations, then everybody else would avoud them too.

Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk


I think timing is the crucial point here. Plus the fact that events are overrunning The Plan. (No plan long survives contact with the RMN).

My brain went somewhere: The Manties were supposed to pound the SLN and FF. Haven was supposed to take advantage and finish off Manticore. Chaos was to ensue triggering the rise of the RF with the Mesa component of the MA staying, still, sub rosa. The RF takes care of RoH with help from the Detweiller class ships as needed. At which point the Epsilon Eridani Edict is pretty much null and void since only the RF has the ability to enforce it.

Somewhere around the rise of the RF, Beowulf was supposed to pop its head up out of the sand looking for allies, to find ... none. Enter failed spoiler of bazillions(?) of deaths on Beowulf. [EDIT:Hutch posted on Re:spoilers is anyone else feeling ..., p4]

At some point, the great new Alpha people arise and announce that the New World order is upon everyone. And The carnage begins in earnest. because in the future, Man has not changed that much,
Helas,chou, Je m'en fache.
Top
Re: Discussions on raiding...
Post by noblehunter   » Fri Sep 16, 2016 2:20 pm

noblehunter
Captain (Junior Grade)

Posts: 385
Joined: Tue Aug 04, 2015 8:49 pm

Even in the absence of an enforcement agency, there are other reasons to avoid an EE violation. Remember, the Edict was passed by a legislature with very simple foreign policy: none. Yet they still managed to bind themselves as their successors to immediate foreign intervention in response to an EE violation. Not just a majority of legislators but all of them, since any single planet could veto it. That implies very powerful motivations, enough to overcome any possible hold-out. Unless there's been a major shift in public opinion regarding planet killing, getting caught doing it is still going to cause major long term problems. Especially if the group in question wants to portray itself as a white knight, saving humanity from the next dark age.
Top
Re: Discussions on raiding...
Post by kzt   » Fri Sep 16, 2016 2:40 pm

kzt
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 11360
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 8:18 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

I think David has implied that they wrote it as an amendment the SL constitution because it was a way around the veto process.

Which of courses raises other thoughts about the future of the SL...
Top

Return to Honorverse