Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 35 guests

ATST Snippet #6 (I think)

This fascinating series is a combination of historical seafaring, swashbuckling adventure, and high technological science-fiction. Join us in a discussion!
Re: ATST Snippet #6 (I think)
Post by XofDallas   » Fri Sep 09, 2016 9:51 am

XofDallas
Commander

Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2013 1:50 pm

Turning to thoughts of Snippet 7, I'm having a lot of fun thinking about what Thirsk is going to say to Maik.

The fun's just getting started! :D
Top
Re: ATST Snippet #6 (I think)
Post by n7axw   » Fri Sep 09, 2016 4:12 pm

n7axw
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5997
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 8:54 pm
Location: Viborg, SD

XofDallas wrote:Turning to thoughts of Snippet 7, I'm having a lot of fun thinking about what Thirsk is going to say to Maik.

The fun's just getting started! :D


What he does (or doesn't) tell Maik couuld be a hint of things to come...

Don

-
When any group seeks political power in God's name, both religion and politics are instantly corrupted.
Top
Re: ATST Snippet #6 (I think)
Post by DMcCunney   » Fri Sep 09, 2016 6:59 pm

DMcCunney
Captain of the List

Posts: 453
Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 2:49 am

n7axw wrote:
XofDallas wrote:Turning to thoughts of Snippet 7, I'm having a lot of fun thinking about what Thirsk is going to say to Maik.

The fun's just getting started! :D
What he does (or doesn't) tell Maik couuld be a hint of things to come...
I speculated elsewhere about it.

I think Thirsk is pretty sure Maik is as unhappy as he is about what the Inquisition has been doing (and requiring Thirsk and the RDN to do.) They haven't explicitly discussed it, but Thirsk is well aware he's still alive and in command of the RDN because Maik has been protecting him, and he knows Maik is well aware of how he feels.

He's still a man of honor, and his honor will demand that he tell Maik about the visit. On the other hand, he won't want to put Maik in the line of fire as a result of any actions he might take. Maik protected him, and he'll feel bound to return the favor.

He's likely to tell Maik he had a visit from the infamous Merlin Athrawes, and knew it was Merlin because he met him in in the process of surrendering his sword to Cayleb after the battle off Armageddon Reach. Whether he'll tell Maik his family is safe will depend upon how Maik takes the news he got a visit from Merlin. But he is likely to make clear he'll no longer do Clyntahn's bidding, and that Maik should take measures to protect himself from Clyntahn's unhappiness when he discovers Thirsk is his enemy.

What Maik should do is throw Thirsk to the wolves to protect himself, but I think Thirsk is pretty sure he won't do that. What he will do will be the fun part. If he comes clean to Thirsk about how unhappy he is at what he's been required to do, and that he can no longer obey his vows to the Grand Inquisitor because they conflict with his duty as a priest and to Mother Church, interesting things can happen.

(Maik's tenure in the Inquisition pre-dates Zhaspar Clyntahn's election as Grand Inquisitor. I suspect he's not the only Inquisitor who privately viewed the election of Clyntahn with dismay, but couldn't very well say so. Clyntahn might discover that not all members of the Inquisition are as loyal as he assumes they must be.)
_______
Dennis
Top
Re: ATST Snippet #6 (I think)
Post by Louis R   » Fri Sep 09, 2016 8:24 pm

Louis R
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1298
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 9:25 pm

Something here that a lot of people seem to be overlooking:

Schuelerite != inquisitor

I'm not even sure that Intendant = inquisitor, at least not before the 'special' intendants started showing up, and even some of them don't seem to be inquisitors.

DMcCunney wrote:
< snip >

(Maik's tenure in the Inquisition pre-dates Zhaspar Clyntahn's election as Grand Inquisitor. I suspect he's not the only Inquisitor who privately viewed the election of Clyntahn with dismay, but couldn't very well say so. Clyntahn might discover that not all members of the Inquisition are as loyal as he assumes they must be.)
_______
Dennis
Top
Re: ATST Snippet #6 (I think)
Post by Loren Pechtel   » Fri Sep 09, 2016 9:34 pm

Loren Pechtel
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1324
Joined: Sat Jul 11, 2015 8:24 pm

fallsfromtrees wrote:As an exercise for the reader:

How many people died of burns in the Hidden berg disaster?

And of those, how many died by being burned by Hydrogen?


1,517 went down with the Titanic.

And hydrogen wasn't involved.
Top
Re: ATST Snippet #6 (I think)
Post by Annachie   » Fri Sep 09, 2016 9:45 pm

Annachie
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 3099
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 7:36 pm

Loren Pechtel wrote:
fallsfromtrees wrote:As an exercise for the reader:

How many people died of burns in the Hidden berg disaster?

And of those, how many died by being burned by Hydrogen?


1,517 went down with the Titanic.

And hydrogen wasn't involved.

There was quite a lot of hydrogeb involved in that one. About twice as much hydrogen as oxygen I believe.
8-)

Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You are so going to die. :p ~~~~ runsforcelery
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
still not dead. :)
Top
Re: ATST Snippet #6 (I think)
Post by XofDallas   » Fri Sep 09, 2016 9:54 pm

XofDallas
Commander

Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2013 1:50 pm

Loren Pechtel wrote:
fallsfromtrees wrote:As an exercise for the reader:

How many people died of burns in the Hidden berg disaster?

And of those, how many died by being burned by Hydrogen?


1,517 went down with the Titanic.

And hydrogen wasn't involved.

You're thinking Titanic. fallsfromtrees' post, I think, was referring to the Hindenburg.
Last edited by XofDallas on Fri Sep 09, 2016 10:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Top
Re: ATST Snippet #6 (I think)
Post by Keith_w   » Fri Sep 09, 2016 10:05 pm

Keith_w
Commodore

Posts: 976
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:10 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

XofDallas wrote:
Loren Pechtel wrote: quote="fallsfromtrees"As an exercise for the reader:

How many people died of burns in the Hidden berg disaster?

And of those, how many died by being burned by Hydrogen? /quote

1,517 went down with the Titanic.

And hydrogen wasn't involved./quote
You're thinking Titanic. Loren's post, I think, was referring to the Hindenburg.


the Titanic was sunk by a hidden berg. You, and I earlier misunderstood the question.
--
A common mistake people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.
Top
Re: ATST Snippet #6 (I think)
Post by XofDallas   » Fri Sep 09, 2016 10:08 pm

XofDallas
Commander

Posts: 156
Joined: Mon Nov 18, 2013 1:50 pm

DMcCunney wrote:
XofDallas wrote:Turning to thoughts of Snippet 7, I'm having a lot of fun thinking about what Thirsk is going to say to Maik.

The fun's just getting started! :D
I speculated elsewhere about it.

I think Thirsk is pretty sure Maik is as unhappy as he is about what the Inquisition has been doing (and requiring Thirsk and the RDN to do.) They haven't explicitly discussed it, but Thirsk is well aware he's still alive and in command of the RDN because Maik has been protecting him, and he knows Maik is well aware of how he feels.

He's still a man of honor, and his honor will demand that he tell Maik about the visit. On the other hand, he won't want to put Maik in the line of fire as a result of any actions he might take. Maik protected him, and he'll feel bound to return the favor.

He's likely to tell Maik he had a visit from the infamous Merlin Athrawes, and knew it was Merlin because he met him in in the process of surrendering his sword to Cayleb after the battle off Armageddon Reach. Whether he'll tell Maik his family is safe will depend upon how Maik takes the news he got a visit from Merlin. But he is likely to make clear he'll no longer do Clyntahn's bidding, and that Maik should take measures to protect himself from Clyntahn's unhappiness when he discovers Thirsk is his enemy.
_______
Dennis


I don't think Thirsk will tell Maik about the visit from Merlin, and I absolutely don't think he'll tell Maik his family is still alive. Thirsk is far too good a strategist for that.

I've been wrong before, thanks to the devious nature of our intrepid scribe. We'll see if I am this time, as well.
Top
Re: ATST Snippet #6 (I think)
Post by PeterZ   » Fri Sep 09, 2016 11:02 pm

PeterZ
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 6432
Joined: Fri Apr 01, 2011 1:11 pm
Location: Colorado

I agree Thirsk will not reveal his family is alive.
I disagree he will not mention Merlin. If Thirsk decides to separate from the Temple and seek Maik's help, he will mention Merlin. If Maik is even remotely willing to support Thirsk, he is willing to accept Merlin is a seiijin and not a demon. Having a seiijin force his hand may be a good way to get Maik off the dime and actively support reform.
Top

Return to Safehold