Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 37 guests
Re: ATST Snippet #6 (I think) | |
---|---|
by XofDallas » Fri Sep 09, 2016 9:51 am | |
XofDallas
Posts: 156
|
Turning to thoughts of Snippet 7, I'm having a lot of fun thinking about what Thirsk is going to say to Maik.
The fun's just getting started! |
Top |
Re: ATST Snippet #6 (I think) | |
---|---|
by n7axw » Fri Sep 09, 2016 4:12 pm | |
n7axw
Posts: 5997
|
What he does (or doesn't) tell Maik couuld be a hint of things to come... Don - When any group seeks political power in God's name, both religion and politics are instantly corrupted.
|
Top |
Re: ATST Snippet #6 (I think) | |
---|---|
by DMcCunney » Fri Sep 09, 2016 6:59 pm | |
DMcCunney
Posts: 453
|
I speculated elsewhere about it. I think Thirsk is pretty sure Maik is as unhappy as he is about what the Inquisition has been doing (and requiring Thirsk and the RDN to do.) They haven't explicitly discussed it, but Thirsk is well aware he's still alive and in command of the RDN because Maik has been protecting him, and he knows Maik is well aware of how he feels. He's still a man of honor, and his honor will demand that he tell Maik about the visit. On the other hand, he won't want to put Maik in the line of fire as a result of any actions he might take. Maik protected him, and he'll feel bound to return the favor. He's likely to tell Maik he had a visit from the infamous Merlin Athrawes, and knew it was Merlin because he met him in in the process of surrendering his sword to Cayleb after the battle off Armageddon Reach. Whether he'll tell Maik his family is safe will depend upon how Maik takes the news he got a visit from Merlin. But he is likely to make clear he'll no longer do Clyntahn's bidding, and that Maik should take measures to protect himself from Clyntahn's unhappiness when he discovers Thirsk is his enemy. What Maik should do is throw Thirsk to the wolves to protect himself, but I think Thirsk is pretty sure he won't do that. What he will do will be the fun part. If he comes clean to Thirsk about how unhappy he is at what he's been required to do, and that he can no longer obey his vows to the Grand Inquisitor because they conflict with his duty as a priest and to Mother Church, interesting things can happen. (Maik's tenure in the Inquisition pre-dates Zhaspar Clyntahn's election as Grand Inquisitor. I suspect he's not the only Inquisitor who privately viewed the election of Clyntahn with dismay, but couldn't very well say so. Clyntahn might discover that not all members of the Inquisition are as loyal as he assumes they must be.) _______ Dennis |
Top |
Re: ATST Snippet #6 (I think) | |
---|---|
by Louis R » Fri Sep 09, 2016 8:24 pm | |
Louis R
Posts: 1298
|
Something here that a lot of people seem to be overlooking:
Schuelerite != inquisitor I'm not even sure that Intendant = inquisitor, at least not before the 'special' intendants started showing up, and even some of them don't seem to be inquisitors.
|
Top |
Re: ATST Snippet #6 (I think) | |
---|---|
by Loren Pechtel » Fri Sep 09, 2016 9:34 pm | |
Loren Pechtel
Posts: 1324
|
1,517 went down with the Titanic. And hydrogen wasn't involved. |
Top |
Re: ATST Snippet #6 (I think) | |
---|---|
by Annachie » Fri Sep 09, 2016 9:45 pm | |
Annachie
Posts: 3099
|
There was quite a lot of hydrogeb involved in that one. About twice as much hydrogen as oxygen I believe. Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You are so going to die. :p ~~~~ runsforcelery ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ still not dead. |
Top |
Re: ATST Snippet #6 (I think) | |
---|---|
by XofDallas » Fri Sep 09, 2016 9:54 pm | |
XofDallas
Posts: 156
|
You're thinking Titanic. fallsfromtrees' post, I think, was referring to the Hindenburg. Last edited by XofDallas on Fri Sep 09, 2016 10:10 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
Top |
Re: ATST Snippet #6 (I think) | |
---|---|
by Keith_w » Fri Sep 09, 2016 10:05 pm | |
Keith_w
Posts: 976
|
the Titanic was sunk by a hidden berg. You, and I earlier misunderstood the question. --
A common mistake people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools. |
Top |
Re: ATST Snippet #6 (I think) | |
---|---|
by XofDallas » Fri Sep 09, 2016 10:08 pm | |
XofDallas
Posts: 156
|
I don't think Thirsk will tell Maik about the visit from Merlin, and I absolutely don't think he'll tell Maik his family is still alive. Thirsk is far too good a strategist for that. I've been wrong before, thanks to the devious nature of our intrepid scribe. We'll see if I am this time, as well. |
Top |
Re: ATST Snippet #6 (I think) | |
---|---|
by PeterZ » Fri Sep 09, 2016 11:02 pm | |
PeterZ
Posts: 6432
|
I agree Thirsk will not reveal his family is alive.
I disagree he will not mention Merlin. If Thirsk decides to separate from the Temple and seek Maik's help, he will mention Merlin. If Maik is even remotely willing to support Thirsk, he is willing to accept Merlin is a seiijin and not a demon. Having a seiijin force his hand may be a good way to get Maik off the dime and actively support reform. |
Top |