Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Mote, Robert_A_Woodward and 68 guests
Re: SPOILERS==Shadow of Victory Comments, Queries and Opinio | |
---|---|
by Annachie » Wed Sep 07, 2016 5:25 am | |
Annachie
Posts: 3099
|
While they weren't exactly league planets, they appear to be transteller's planets.
Which is close enough for MAlign purposes. Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You are so going to die. :p ~~~~ runsforcelery ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ still not dead. |
Top |
Re: SPOILERS==Shadow of Victory Comments, Queries and Opinio | |
---|---|
by munroburton » Wed Sep 07, 2016 6:01 am | |
munroburton
Posts: 2375
|
I've reread a little and it appears I got Wloclawek and Chotebor mixed up. The former doesn't appear to have any OFS or Transstellar presence. However, they still called for OFS assistance and...
Hieronim Mazur is the head of the SEOM, which appears to be a home-grown conglomerate doing to its own planet what it usually takes a transstellar to do. So the relationship is not too different from what New Tuscany had with Commissioner Verrochio. Either that or OFS always responds to calls for assistance, since it lets them get hooks into new victims. |
Top |
Re: SPOILERS==Shadow of Victory Comments, Queries and Opinio | |
---|---|
by shayvaan » Wed Sep 07, 2016 6:04 am | |
shayvaan
Posts: 86
|
I don't know if anyone else picked up on it, but it seems as if everyone is outraged by the recent Ballroom attacks on the planet of Safehold, a place called Green Valley on the island nation of Corisande.
Edit: I did find one mention of Green Pines in the eArc but all of the rest were Green Valley. Edit: I definitely hope that doesn't mean that they killed General Green Valley, Cayleb and Merlin would be quite upset |
Top |
Re: SPOILERS==Shadow of Victory Comments, Queries and Opinio | |
---|---|
by Fiannawolf » Wed Sep 07, 2016 11:33 pm | |
Fiannawolf
Posts: 37
|
Now this is the type of side-winks I like to see in any books. By the time the next Honorverse and Safehold books hit....I should be done re-reading both series. I am in book hell and I like it. |
Top |
Re: SPOILERS==Shadow of Victory Comments, Queries and Opinio | |
---|---|
by Lord Skimper » Thu Sep 08, 2016 8:35 am | |
Lord Skimper
Posts: 1736
|
Remember each novel has to be written from the point of view that this is your first introduction to the series. If you pick up a novel without explaining who anyone is or what is going on, that is the definition of a bad book. The book isn't written for us super Fans, it is written for everyone. We view books like TV shows, but they are not. More like a stand alone movie each on its own each explains each character each gives a reason for each character...
As for the time line not expanding it means three things, something is going to happen, it is going to happen soon 1922ish and it is going to be milked for as much money as possible. Can you imagine is Starwars 1-6 was a single movie in 1978. A good movie but if it ended where it started when it started it would be more like THX 1138. George would have made half a million vs how many billion? If Starwars 7 was the second movie would it be ranking in billions? SEN 5241 anyone? ________________________________________
Just don't ask what is in the protein bars. |
Top |
Re: SPOILERS==Shadow of Victory Comments, Queries and Opinio | |
---|---|
by OrlandoNative » Thu Sep 08, 2016 4:04 pm | |
OrlandoNative
Posts: 361
|
Even so, it seems almost inconceivable that Jack McBryde is the *ONLY* "defector" who managed to actually get some information out in all the centuries the MA had been in existence. While I'm sure the nanotech *helps*, from all that we've seen so far it's keyed to very specific triggers, like words, phrases, maybe even specific voices. After all, you wouldn't want two members of the "inside" kill each other discussing normal (or even abnormal) events in the course of their normal work. Most of the nanotech seems to be more in the way of a "kill switch" - something another member can trigger if they think there's a reason to prevent secrets coming to light (like in the case of Rajampet). There could also be a built in time trigger if certain phrases weren't heard or people seen within certain limits. "Yield to temptation, it may not pass your way again."
|
Top |
Re: SPOILERS==Shadow of Victory Comments, Queries and Opinio | |
---|---|
by Annachie » Thu Sep 08, 2016 6:32 pm | |
Annachie
Posts: 3099
|
The triggers are probably different for each person, and adjustable.
Sent from my SM-G920I using Tapatalk ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
You are so going to die. :p ~~~~ runsforcelery ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ still not dead. |
Top |
Re: SPOILERS==Shadow of Victory Comments, Queries and Opinio | |
---|---|
by Keith_w » Thu Sep 08, 2016 9:35 pm | |
Keith_w
Posts: 976
|
From my reading of SoV, I thought that Harap's nanotech was on a timer, not codeworded. I don't think that Simoe has the nanotech in him. --
A common mistake people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools. |
Top |
Re: SPOILERS==Shadow of Victory Comments, Queries and Opinio | |
---|---|
by kzt » Thu Sep 08, 2016 9:42 pm | |
kzt
Posts: 11360
|
He was guessing. I don't think it was actually stated.
|
Top |
Re: SPOILERS==Shadow of Victory Comments, Queries and Opinio | |
---|---|
by OrlandoNative » Thu Sep 08, 2016 9:42 pm | |
OrlandoNative
Posts: 361
|
If you remember, the nanotech needs to be created in advance based on each individual's DNA. So while the triggers may be different for each person, I don't think they're easily changed. At least out in the field. "Yield to temptation, it may not pass your way again."
|
Top |