Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 39 guests

ATST Snippet #6 (I think)

This fascinating series is a combination of historical seafaring, swashbuckling adventure, and high technological science-fiction. Join us in a discussion!
Re: ATST Snippet #6 (I think)
Post by n7axw   » Wed Sep 07, 2016 2:26 pm

n7axw
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5997
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 8:54 pm
Location: Viborg, SD

Weird Harold wrote:
WeberFan wrote:What you say is very true. Called Constantly-Computed-Impact-Point (CCIP), the reticle or HUD continuously shows where the weapon will impact if you release it right....... NOW :P

What I was referring to in my post was "old-school" bombing instruction without any of those new-fangled computer thingies....


Even with CCIP a pilot needs to fly a fairly smooth bombing run to have any reasonable sort of accuracy. The more you jimk, the harder it is to get the reticle to settle down so you can aim with it.


I thought that you just fed in the info, realeased the sidewinder and gave it the job of finding the target...

If true, it doesn't sound very sporting... :lol:

Don

-
When any group seeks political power in God's name, both religion and politics are instantly corrupted.
Top
Re: ATST Snippet #6 (I think)
Post by Weird Harold   » Wed Sep 07, 2016 4:07 pm

Weird Harold
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4478
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2014 10:25 pm
Location: "Lost Wages", NV

n7axw wrote:I thought that you just fed in the info, realeased the sidewinder and gave it the job of finding the target...


Sidewinders are air-to-air missiles. CCIP is for dumb bombs.
.
.
.
Answers! I got lots of answers!

(Now if I could just find the right questions.)
Top
Re: ATST Snippet #6 (I think)
Post by Peter2   » Wed Sep 07, 2016 4:20 pm

Peter2
Captain (Junior Grade)

Posts: 371
Joined: Tue Sep 02, 2014 10:54 am

Weird Harold wrote:
WeberFan wrote:What you say is very true. Called Constantly-Computed-Impact-Point (CCIP), the reticle or HUD continuously shows where the weapon will impact if you release it right....... NOW :P

What I was referring to in my post was "old-school" bombing instruction without any of those new-fangled computer thingies....


Even with CCIP a pilot needs to fly a fairly smooth bombing run to have any reasonable sort of accuracy. The more you jimk, the harder it is to get the reticle to settle down so you can aim with it.


After dropping the bouncing bombs that burst the Möhne and Eder dams during WW2, 617 Squadron became a high-accuracy bombing squadron using 6-ton and 10-ton bombs (one per aircraft) and something called SABS – the Stabilising Automatic Bomb Sight. It required the pilot to fly his aeroplane straight and level at maximum operating height for 10 miles while the bomb-aimer held the target in the bomb-sight reticule until the bomb was released. Instances of very high accuracy were achieved (it was used to hit the Tirpitz), and a fair number of the Squadron actually survived the war.
.
Top
Re: ATST Snippet #6 (I think)
Post by Louis R   » Wed Sep 07, 2016 11:28 pm

Louis R
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1298
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 9:25 pm

Instances of very high accuracy were virtually routine.

And survival was aided by having the entire squadron - or more, there were several in 5 Group - flying in a ring with a 10-mile radius around the target. With 20-40 aircraft starting their runs to the target at the same time, the poor sods on the Flak didn't know who to shoot at ;)


Peter2 wrote:
Weird Harold wrote:Even with CCIP a pilot needs to fly a fairly smooth bombing run to have any reasonable sort of accuracy. The more you jimk, the harder it is to get the reticle to settle down so you can aim with it.


After dropping the bouncing bombs that burst the Möhne and Eder dams during WW2, 617 Squadron became a high-accuracy bombing squadron using 6-ton and 10-ton bombs (one per aircraft) and something called SABS – the Stabilising Automatic Bomb Sight. It required the pilot to fly his aeroplane straight and level at maximum operating height for 10 miles while the bomb-aimer held the target in the bomb-sight reticule until the bomb was released. Instances of very high accuracy were achieved (it was used to hit the Tirpitz), and a fair number of the Squadron actually survived the war.
.
Top
Re: ATST Snippet #6 (I think)
Post by n7axw   » Thu Sep 08, 2016 2:38 pm

n7axw
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5997
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 8:54 pm
Location: Viborg, SD

Weird Harold wrote:
n7axw wrote:I thought that you just fed in the info, realeased the sidewinder and gave it the job of finding the target...


Sidewinders are air-to-air missiles. CCIP is for dumb bombs.


Isn't there a missile that is fed coordinates, fired from ships and goes and finds it's target?

Don

-
When any group seeks political power in God's name, both religion and politics are instantly corrupted.
Top
Re: ATST Snippet #6 (I think)
Post by Joat42   » Thu Sep 08, 2016 3:13 pm

Joat42
Admiral

Posts: 2162
Joined: Tue Apr 16, 2013 7:01 am
Location: Sweden

n7axw wrote:
n7axw wrote:I thought that you just fed in the info, realeased the sidewinder and gave it the job of finding the target...
Weird Harold wrote:Sidewinders are air-to-air missiles. CCIP is for dumb bombs.

Isn't there a missile that is fed coordinates, fired from ships and goes and finds it's target?

Don
-

You are probably thinking of the Tomahawk cruise missile. It can be fired from a multitude of platforms actually, not just ships.

---
Jack of all trades and destructive tinkerer.


Anyone who have simple solutions for complex problems is a fool.
Top
Re: ATST Snippet #6 (I think)
Post by Weird Harold   » Thu Sep 08, 2016 7:28 pm

Weird Harold
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4478
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2014 10:25 pm
Location: "Lost Wages", NV

n7axw wrote:
Weird Harold wrote: CCIP is for dumb bombs.


Isn't there a missile that is fed coordinates, fired from ships and goes and finds it's target?


Several, actually. As mentioned, the Tomahawk Cruise missile is the primary ship-to-surface missile of ships, but it or similar missiles can be launched from a variety of platforms -- bombers, or mobile truck/tank/ etc launchers.

There is also the JDAM GPS guidance package for iron bombs, laser guidance packages for iron bombs, Electro-optical guidance packages for iron bombs, and a couple of others I can't recall off-hand -- plus anything they've developed in the 27 years since I retired.

None of those have anything to do with CCIP or the older bombing methods Weberfan was talking about. Weberfan's older bombing methods -- or the dam-busters "forked stick" sighting method -- is more applicable to Safehold's level of aeronautics.
.
.
.
Answers! I got lots of answers!

(Now if I could just find the right questions.)
Top
Re: ATST Snippet #6 (I think)
Post by Dragonstar   » Fri Sep 09, 2016 4:21 am

Dragonstar
Midshipman

Posts: 1
Joined: Thu Sep 08, 2016 1:07 pm

Just saw this snippet...

It seems like they finally have Clyntahn... but I wonder what he would think if he had to use this chamber pot.
Top
Re: ATST Snippet #6 (I think)
Post by fallsfromtrees   » Fri Sep 09, 2016 4:33 am

fallsfromtrees
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1960
Joined: Tue Nov 04, 2014 10:51 am
Location: Mesa, Arizona

As an exercise for the reader:

How many people died of burns in the Hidden berg disaster?

And of those, how many died by being burned by Hydrogen?
========================

The only problem with quotes on the internet is that you can't authenticate them -- Abraham Lincoln
Top
Re: ATST Snippet #6 (I think)
Post by Keith_w   » Fri Sep 09, 2016 6:55 am

Keith_w
Commodore

Posts: 976
Joined: Tue Apr 10, 2012 12:10 pm
Location: Ontario, Canada

fallsfromtrees wrote:As an exercise for the reader:

How many people died of burns in the Hidden berg disaster?

And of those, how many died by being burned by Hydrogen?


36 passengers and crew of the Hindenburg died, and 1 groundsman. At least 9 of the crew died of hydrogen burns.
--
A common mistake people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools.
Top

Return to Safehold