Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 23 guests
Re: Solarian League Naval Strenght versus SLN Strength | |
---|---|
by Rincewind » Sat Sep 03, 2016 12:33 pm | |
Rincewind
Posts: 277
|
Actually, reading the posts on this topic, I am beginning to wonder how many of the SDFs actually predate the formation of the SLN. It also brings up the question of how the SLN was first formed; i.e. from contingents of the members own SDFs much like proposals for the creation of a European Army.
Thoughts anyone? |
Top |
Re: Solarian League Naval Strenght versus SLN Strength | |
---|---|
by Vince » Sat Sep 03, 2016 12:43 pm | |
Vince
Posts: 1574
|
Theisman's press conference announced the SDPs, not the MDMs aboard them: Boldface is my emphasis. -------------------------------------------------------------
History does not repeat itself so much as it echoes. |
Top |
Re: Solarian League Naval Strenght versus SLN Strength | |
---|---|
by Dilandu » Sat Sep 03, 2016 1:21 pm | |
Dilandu
Posts: 2541
|
Frankly, it would make much more sence if the League actually participated in some pretty serious war a few centuries before. Such actions could validate both the existence of enormous fleet reserve, and the SLN general arrogance: if they actually fought and defeated some pretty serious foe long ago, this would make their current arrogance much more credible. But if i'm not mistaken, RFC for some reason insisted that League never fought serious wars, which made the whole situation... quite a bit less understandable. ------------------------------
Oh well, if shortening the front is what the Germans crave, Let's shorten it to very end - the length of Fuhrer's grave. (Red Army lyrics from 1945) |
Top |
Re: Solarian League Naval Strenght versus SLN Strength | |
---|---|
by Somtaaw » Sat Sep 03, 2016 1:36 pm | |
Somtaaw
Posts: 1204
|
And shortly after the second passage you quoted, Janacek also points out that just because they have podlayers doesn't mean they have the same range as Manticoran podlayers. |
Top |
Re: Solarian League Naval Strenght versus SLN Strength | |
---|---|
by ChronicRder » Sat Sep 03, 2016 2:10 pm | |
ChronicRder
Posts: 108
|
I'm trying to think of examples Henke brought up, because I must have missed that part in my reading the earc. Even still, the various SDFs may be more innovative than the SLN or even the SL in general is, but how quantifiable is that? They can be as innovative and adaptive as they want, but even their observers wouldn't have been able to see everything. In fact I can't remember a battle in which Solarian observers (official or otherwise) were there. Most of those SDFs, even the Core Worlds SDFs would be largely backwaters compared to that war. Sure, they can start running some numbers, even generate some missiles to wargame with, but they wouldn't have the doctrines or expertise to use them. Notable exception, of course, is Beowulf, but they always had a de facto alliance with Manticore anyway... And those same SDFs, if and once they had that tech, why wouldn't they be biding their time to break from the League, much like Maya is doing, and use their modern tech as their insurance policy? |
Top |
Re: Solarian League Naval Strenght versus SLN Strength | |
---|---|
by ChronicRder » Sat Sep 03, 2016 2:10 pm | |
ChronicRder
Posts: 108
|
I'm trying to think of examples Henke brought up, because I must have missed that part in my reading the earc. Even still, the various SDFs may be more innovative than the SLN or even the SL in general is, but how quantifiable is that? They can be as innovative and adaptive as they want, but even their observers wouldn't have been able to see everything. In fact I can't remember a battle in which Solarian observers (official or otherwise) were there. Most of those SDFs, even the Core Worlds SDFs would be largely backwaters compared to that war. Sure, they can start running some numbers, even generate some missiles to wargame with, but they wouldn't have the doctrines or expertise to use them. Notable exception, of course, is Beowulf, but they always had a de facto alliance with Manticore anyway... And those same SDFs, if and once they had that tech, why wouldn't they be biding their time to break from the League, much like Maya is doing, and use their modern tech as their insurance policy? |
Top |
Re: Solarian League Naval Strenght versus SLN Strength | |
---|---|
by Rincewind » Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:16 pm | |
Rincewind
Posts: 277
|
With regards Michelle Henke, it is early in Storm from the Shadows when, whilst a POW, she is invited to dine with Eloise Pritchart in order to send a message to Queen Elizabeth proposing a truce & talks. The passage is as follows:
For the textev that RFC said that the SLN was inferior to many of the SDFs the passage is as follows:
|
Top |
Re: Solarian League Naval Strenght versus SLN Strength | |
---|---|
by munroburton » Sat Sep 03, 2016 3:24 pm | |
munroburton
Posts: 2375
|
The League was founded ~925PD The impeller drive was invented ~1246PD Warshawski invented her sails ~1273PD Inertial compensator developed ~1384PD Eridani Edict 1410PD Countergravity was invented ~1502PD (speculation/rumour)Gustav Anderman I designs the first BB in early-mid 1500s Last time SLN Battle Fleet fought ~1620PD All ships before 1250 had to be using reaction-thruster based designs. Interstellar travel was difficult and rarely undertaken until after 1275. All ships before 1390 had to be designed for acceleration and could do no more than 10-15G. That the Eridani Edict was issued in 1410 suggests that those three preceding technologies made interstellar warfare considerably more... active. Then after 1500 and countergrav, Anderman(this is based on reported comments from conventions and the like) designed the first battleship and sold it to the SL in exchange for a battle squadron of his own. The Sollies may have later licensed the design out to Manticore(mentioned in the Ad Astra DN's text, HoS) and others. Point is, the crudity of mid-Diaspora technologies pretty much stopped anyone from waging war on an interstellar scale. The only "SDF" around was probably Earth's, if it built one after the moon rebels carried out the Heinlein maneuver(about 40 years before the Diaspora started). So I'm thinking any SDFs at the time of the League's founding would've only existed in systems with multiple planets or very close neighbours(like Grayson & Masada) who are disagreeable. That sort of thing. |
Top |
Re: Solarian League Naval Strenght versus SLN Strength | |
---|---|
by Vince » Sat Sep 03, 2016 4:05 pm | |
Vince
Posts: 1574
|
I thought about including that part as well, but I didn't because: 1) Janacek should have known that Haven, having been on the receiving end of MDMs, would make it a emergency crash program to develop, produce, and be ready to deploy them at all costs, and 2) Haven wouldn't have announced the existence of their SDPs as the announcement would provoke Manticore (even though Theisman's announcement deliberately understated the numbers they had built to attempt to avoid provoking them too much as well as having the numbers available in case Manticore did react by immediately resuming hostilities) unless they had the range to effectively shoot back (otherwise they would simply be more targets for the RMN to engage). That means Haven had to have MDMs, and Janacek was either criminally stupid in assuming they didn't, or criminally negligent in making the point he actually did to the other members of the Manticore government--and himself as well (giving assurance that Haven didn't have MDMs). Or both at once. -------------------------------------------------------------
History does not repeat itself so much as it echoes. |
Top |
Re: Solarian League Naval Strenght versus SLN Strength | |
---|---|
by Somtaaw » Sat Sep 03, 2016 5:13 pm | |
Somtaaw
Posts: 1204
|
Well yeah, but we already knew all that. Between Janacek and Jurgensen, neither one of them were actually intelligent and were more concerned with the local political equation, not to mention being Conservatives they were actually isolationist. And that they'd spent the entire pre-war arguing loudly that people like White Haven were alarmist, etc just like Houseman was like in HotQ.
Just one chapter after the quotes you intially made, and here's Janacek, who based off the information he was getting from Jurgensen, are pointing out that the only hard information they have came from Theisman, but specifically pointed out that just because they have hulls doesn't mean the tech is equal and that they [Manticoran] should still hold the tech (and range) advantages. Now, to be fair to Janacek, he was indeed operating under the information Jurgensen was supposed to be providing. Janacek may not have liked hearing the truths, and Jurgensen seemed incapable of even providing hard truths, as evidenced considerably later on WoH, when his very FIRST thought upon seeing an emergency dispatch boiled down to "how can I lose this report from Admiral Harrington?" But Janacek had alot of his own blinders, particular in regards to White Haven, and since those blinders worked hand in hand with the false information he was getting from Jurgensen, it turned a bad situation even worse and he was living in a fantasyland with zero relation to reality. |
Top |