Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 85 guests
Re: Solarian League Naval Strenght versus SLN Strength | |
---|---|
by Duckk » Fri Sep 02, 2016 11:15 am | |
Duckk
Posts: 4200
|
Ever hear of that wargame where the USN got spanked by speedboats and cruise missiles only for the results to be invalidated? Militaries come to conclusions they want to hear all the time. The Solarian League totally does that. Manticore and Haven are a lot better at not doing that because their existence hinged on getting it right. And even then, small scale cases of this still existed, like what happened during the Shrike tests.
-------------------------
Shields at 50%, taunting at 100%! - Tom Pope |
Top |
Re: Solarian League Naval Strenght versus SLN Strength | |
---|---|
by Star Knight » Fri Sep 02, 2016 11:20 am | |
Star Knight
Posts: 843
|
Good point, i never understood this either. I mean, IMO there are many good reasons why the SLN is incompetent and lacks behind. What i dont get is why made them so utterly and totally outclassed that its not even funny anymore. Kinda the first rule of any military scifi literature, the battles should be interesting and engaging. I remember the times after AAC/TSoS when we were waiting for the Battle of Spindle to play out. Many great discussions back then if 10th Fleet would be able to hold against what most assumed were the equivalent of at least Sphinx class SDs. 10th Fleet should have won, but it would have been a very tough fight. But well, in the book Henke got Apollo pods and the Sollies autocannons instead of laser clusters. Too bad. And its not just the SLN. The Alignment suffers from the same problem. Their tech is good on paper and would be fun to read about a couple of in universe years down the road, but we'll never actually get there. |
Top |
Re: Wallers (Spoiler/WAGing) | |
---|---|
by pnakasone » Fri Sep 02, 2016 11:20 am | |
pnakasone
Posts: 402
|
For an arms race to occur you have to have an enemy you firmly believe can hurt you enough to defeat you. Warefare had been static for several centuries by the time the Havenite wars occurred. The problem is that SLN leadership did not believe it was even possible that the "neobarbs" could even develop any tech to match them let alone surpass them. |
Top |
Re: Wallers (Spoiler/WAGing) | |
---|---|
by Duckk » Fri Sep 02, 2016 11:29 am | |
Duckk
Posts: 4200
|
Exactly. Here's another real life case: smartphones. Back 10 years ago, no one had Apple on their radar. It was just Microsoft, Blackberry, and Nokia. Apple was just this quirky company that made Macs and MP3 players. And if you remember anything about the smartphones back then, they weren't very smart. When Apple dropped the iPhone like an atom bomb on the public, none of their engineers could believe the technological claims. They were fully entrenched in the ecosystem as they knew it. And where are all three now? Completely gone from the phone game. -------------------------
Shields at 50%, taunting at 100%! - Tom Pope |
Top |
Re: Wallers (Spoiler/WAGing) | |
---|---|
by Dilandu » Fri Sep 02, 2016 11:30 am | |
Dilandu
Posts: 2541
|
Basically again, it's not only improbable, but impractical solution. For example: the US military before World War II clearly underestimated Japanese tech level and generally considered Japan as realtively weak military power. But does this means, that US military just stopped working on new weapons? No: they invested quite a lot in newest possible solutions, like Mark I fire control computers and magnetic torpedoes (admittedly, the magnetic fuze aren't their great achievement, but they were clearly considered as pinnacle of pre-war technology). And again: all Havenite war was NOT "local conflict somewhere else". It was basically next door to the center of the League - just one transit from Beowulf. The war was not just close; the war was literally one step from being inside the League itself. There is no way the League could "just ignore that". Moreover, there is no any particular reason WHY the League should "just ignore that". Who would benefit from such actions? What would be the prize for inaction? ------------------------------
Oh well, if shortening the front is what the Germans crave, Let's shorten it to very end - the length of Fuhrer's grave. (Red Army lyrics from 1945) |
Top |
Re: Solarian League Naval Strenght versus SLN Strength | |
---|---|
by Duckk » Fri Sep 02, 2016 11:44 am | |
Duckk
Posts: 4200
|
http://infodump.thefifthimperium.com/en ... ngton/67/1
http://infodump.thefifthimperium.com/en ... gton/234/1 -------------------------
Shields at 50%, taunting at 100%! - Tom Pope |
Top |
Re: Wallers (Spoiler/WAGing) | |
---|---|
by nrellis » Fri Sep 02, 2016 12:27 pm | |
nrellis
Posts: 250
|
The League has always seen itself as the most important star nation in existence, and the SLN was designed to maintain that belief, both in the mind's of the League's own citizens, and more importantly, in the mind's of outsiders. The maintenance costs of the reserve fleet are essentially zero but the scrapage cost of a superdreadnaught are significant, so its easier to just leave old ships where they are and build a new ones. This trend has gone on for centuries. During this time nothing had ever challenged the League's core belief about itself, and the idea had totally taken hold that nothing ever would, or could, which has driven the belief that it was not only the most important, but also the most technologically, culturally and 'every-other-attribute' advanced too. The SLN's conceptualisation of war was similarly stagnant: wars were like this in the past, and will be like this in the future, and we have exactly the fleet needed to decisively win the last war. Here is the kicker: twenty years ago this belief was entirely justified, they really did have a fleet that could win every war just by existing. They 'knew' it didn't matter if they lost 50 SDs in every engagement, those ships could be immediately replaced by almost identical ships from the reserve. The RMN's revolution in shipbuilding came about because they challenged every idea underlying the stagnant model the SLN was built to maintain. Its results may have exploded into Solarian consciousness in the last year, and Havenite consciousness in the last fifteen, but its roots go back to King Roger's build up 70 years ago --------------------------------------------------
"True wisdom comes to each of us when we realize how little we understand about life, ourselves, and the world around us." Socrates. |
Top |
Re: Wallers (Spoiler/WAGing) | |
---|---|
by pnakasone » Fri Sep 02, 2016 12:52 pm | |
pnakasone
Posts: 402
|
The fact that thous in charge of the SL and its navy refer to almost every one who is not a member of the SL as neobarb speaks volumes for the mind set of the leadership. With that kind of mind set do they take anything that neobarbs are doing seriously? What they had in place had worked for centuries why change it just because some neobarbs where having a little spate on their very very large door step? As an example look at how Europe viewed the Russo-Japanese War. |
Top |
Re: Wallers (Spoiler/WAGing) | |
---|---|
by munroburton » Fri Sep 02, 2016 1:27 pm | |
munroburton
Posts: 2375
|
Could you expand on that example? IIRC, the Battle of Tsushima more or less confirmed the dreadnought doctrine and certainly fuelled the British-German naval arms race preceding WW1. |
Top |
Re: Wallers (Spoiler/WAGing) | |
---|---|
by Vince » Fri Sep 02, 2016 1:27 pm | |
Vince
Posts: 1574
|
Regarding the statement above in bold, here's the supporting analysis by fester: An apologia for Battle Fleet (Potential HoS Spoilers) -------------------------------------------------------------
History does not repeat itself so much as it echoes. |
Top |