kzt wrote:Which is in and of itself is interesting. One wonders what exactly can be vetoed and how one can work around that. Assuming that they don't just arrest everyone who votes against a resolution and holds another vote until it "passes by acclamation".
A first guess would be that only a vote on a new law might be subject to that single nation veto.
But the vote to investigate Beowulf wasn't a new law.
But yes, you'd think that since IIRC the vote passed something like 75/25 that at least one of the 25%-ish would have then vetoed it if that was allowed. I could see Beowulf being ineligible to veto a motion on themselves; but it seems inconceivable that not one of the others who voted no cared enough to follow through with a veto (even at the risk of some unofficial retaliation later). So I can only conclude that that vote for some reason wasn't subject to veto. But I don't believe RFC ever clarified exactly what was and wasn't vetoable in the League.