drothgery wrote:Nico wrote:Yup, so it seems that whenever one of the senior posts vacates, the others on that level decides whom to appoint to the vacant post. Don't know how it would work for lower positions, though.
Though I'd imagine the only plausible candidates are the most senior underlings of the outgoing permanent undersecretary. Defense doesn't have a permanent undersecretary among the Mandarins, but Ranji was the next best thing to one, and Kingsford was his obvious successor.
The difference between how a military hierarchy functions and how a civilian bureaucracy does would come into play here. With a military hierarchy there are clear chains of command, with one position officially being more senior than the next, so that when the top most position vacates the next most senior then moves up. So yes, with Ranjani's death Kingsford would automatically be promoted.
With a civilian bureaucracy it isn't nearly as rigid or clearly-defined. The seniority of various nominally-equal departments or agencies would be fluid, depending on current priorities and circumstances that might change within just a single budget cycle. So let's say the Director for Trade Negotiations dies or retires, then the mandarins would not have a clear choice of replacement. Any of the sectoral Deputy Directors might be most senior at that specific moment, depending on whether trade negotiations with or within their sector are most urgent or most important to the central government's aims at that time.
What that means is that the Department of Trade Negotiations won't have a strict chain of command, so politics on the personal level will come into play. Which candidate will garner most support among those responsible for deciding the replacement will depend on personal loyalties, favours exchanged etc.