Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 23 guests

Transtellars after Laccoon II

Join us in talking discussing all things Honor, including (but not limited to) tactics, favorite characters, and book discussions.
Re: Transtellars after Laccoon II
Post by Brigade XO   » Sun Jul 24, 2016 5:04 pm

Brigade XO
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 3190
Joined: Sat Nov 14, 2009 12:31 pm
Location: KY

We have examples in the relatively recent past with things like the British East India Company and the Dutch East India Company. To a vastly lesser extent we have Hudson's Bay Company. There were others.

East India Company essentialy operated as a Nation-State with it's own Navy (both armed merchant ships and what should be considered actual warships) plus local governers for the territory it held either outright as sovereign rulers or though it's system of trade negotiators and agents. It fought wars, defended territory, invaded countries, co-oped local rulers.

Nothing new, just give them starships and ability to take and hold economic (and political) power along with being able to bring their own military or those of friendly (or original parent nation) to focus on problems they can't resolve though strictly "trade" deals.

It's the excesses that find the way into history.
Top
Re: Transtellars after Laccoon II
Post by Nico   » Sun Jul 24, 2016 9:20 pm

Nico
Lieutenant (Senior Grade)

Posts: 78
Joined: Mon Jan 25, 2016 2:14 pm

Sepoy Uprising?
Top
Re: Transtellars after Laccoon II
Post by Weird Harold   » Sun Jul 24, 2016 9:37 pm

Weird Harold
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4478
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2014 10:25 pm
Location: "Lost Wages", NV

Nico wrote:Sepoy Uprising?


That's what Gov. Barregos is planning for the Maya sector.
.
.
.
Answers! I got lots of answers!

(Now if I could just find the right questions.)
Top
Re: Transtellars after Laccoon II
Post by SharkHunter   » Sun Jul 24, 2016 10:27 pm

SharkHunter
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1608
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2014 3:53 pm
Location: Independence, Missouri

Brigade XO wrote:We have examples in the relatively recent past with things like the British East India Company and the Dutch East India Company. To a vastly lesser extent we have Hudson's Bay Company. There were others.

East India Company essentialy operated as a Nation-State with it's own Navy (both armed merchant ships and what should be considered actual warships) plus local governers for the territory it held either outright as sovereign rulers or though it's system of trade negotiators and agents. It fought wars, defended territory, invaded countries, co-oped local rulers.

Nothing new, just give them starships and ability to take and hold economic (and political) power along with being able to bring their own military or those of friendly (or original parent nation) to focus on problems they can't resolve though strictly "trade" deals.

It's the excesses that find the way into history.
Grins... exactly the reference I was hoping would leap up!! So how does Manticore/the GA, etc. take down said types of enterprises? given that they really aren't a healthy group to keep around...
---------------------
All my posts are YMMV, IMHO, and welcoming polite discussion, extension, and rebuttal. This is the HonorVerse, after all
Top
Re: Transtellars after Laccoon II
Post by Louis R   » Sun Jul 24, 2016 11:15 pm

Louis R
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1298
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 9:25 pm

Same way John Company went out of business: its activities became an embarrassment to the home government, and it was stripped of its private empire.

All companies are based somewhere; they escape oversight only to the extent that the overseers are happy to have it that way. I would expect that many of the worst offenders out in the Verge and Protectorates are based in places that don't give a rat's tuckus about how they operate 'out there' as long as they behave at home. They may find that they have a lot less support in the future than they've enjoyed in the past. Others probably haven't behaved nearly as badly - and may have home governments that have been keeping them on a shorter leash, or at least would have if they'd made the mistake of drawing unfavourable attention to their operations. And, of course, there's no doubt a substantial number of transtellars that aren't involved out there at all, and haven't wanted to be.

SharkHunter wrote:
Brigade XO wrote:We have examples in the relatively recent past with things like the British East India Company and the Dutch East India Company. To a vastly lesser extent we have Hudson's Bay Company. There were others.

East India Company essentialy operated as a Nation-State with it's own Navy (both armed merchant ships and what should be considered actual warships) plus local governers for the territory it held either outright as sovereign rulers or though it's system of trade negotiators and agents. It fought wars, defended territory, invaded countries, co-oped local rulers.

Nothing new, just give them starships and ability to take and hold economic (and political) power along with being able to bring their own military or those of friendly (or original parent nation) to focus on problems they can't resolve though strictly "trade" deals.

It's the excesses that find the way into history.
Grins... exactly the reference I was hoping would leap up!! So how does Manticore/the GA, etc. take down said types of enterprises? given that they really aren't a healthy group to keep around...
Top
Re: Transtellars after Laccoon II
Post by kzt   » Sun Jul 24, 2016 11:26 pm

kzt
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 11360
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 8:18 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

Louis R wrote:Same way John Company went out of business: its activities became an embarrassment to the home government, and it was stripped of its private empire.

All companies are based somewhere; they escape oversight only to the extent that the overseers are happy to have it that way. I would expect that many of the worst offenders out in the Verge and Protectorates are based in places that don't give a rat's tuckus about how they operate 'out there' as long as they behave at home. They may find that they have a lot less support in the future than they've enjoyed in the past. Others probably haven't behaved nearly as badly - and may have home governments that have been keeping them on a shorter leash, or at least would have if they'd made the mistake of drawing unfavourable attention to their operations. And, of course, there's no doubt a substantial number of transtellars that aren't involved out there at all, and haven't wanted to be.

At the scale being talked about, they are larger and more powerful than the government of any planet. These have had literally a thousand years to grow and develope.
Top
Re: Transtellars after Laccoon II
Post by pnakasone   » Mon Jul 25, 2016 12:22 am

pnakasone
Captain of the List

Posts: 402
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 11:21 pm

How well are the most exploitative transtellers going to do with out the OFS backing them up with the FF and Gendarmerie?

I could well see some of the smarter scoundrels deciding to pack their bags with what ever portable wealth they have on hand and find some place nice to live out their lives.
Top
Re: Transtellars after Laccoon II
Post by kzt   » Mon Jul 25, 2016 12:45 am

kzt
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 11360
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 8:18 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

pnakasone wrote:How well are the most exploitative transtellers going to do with out the OFS backing them up with the FF and Gendarmerie?

It depends, how much profit is there to be had? It has never been hard to recruit thugs to break heads. And if there is enough money in it to justify owning combat spacecraft, they can do that too without breaking the bank. DDs are not that expensive if you have profit every year greater than the GSP of a core world.
Top
Re: Transtellars after Laccoon II
Post by pnakasone   » Mon Jul 25, 2016 5:24 am

pnakasone
Captain of the List

Posts: 402
Joined: Mon Sep 28, 2015 11:21 pm

kzt wrote:
pnakasone wrote:How well are the most exploitative transtellers going to do with out the OFS backing them up with the FF and Gendarmerie?

It depends, how much profit is there to be had? It has never been hard to recruit thugs to break heads. And if there is enough money in it to justify owning combat spacecraft, they can do that too without breaking the bank. DDs are not that expensive if you have profit every year greater than the GSP of a core world.


True. But it is cheaper for them to pay the OFS to provide such services.

Then the issue of making sure they officially do not have anything to do with the dirty work as that was done by the OFS. Of course the OFS will claim that they where just helping the local legitimate government deal with violent criminal rabble in a completely legal and moral way.
Top
Re: Transtellars after Laccoon II
Post by kzt   » Mon Jul 25, 2016 11:08 am

kzt
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 11360
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 8:18 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

pnakasone wrote:True. But it is cheaper for them to pay the OFS to provide such services.

Then the issue of making sure they officially do not have anything to do with the dirty work as that was done by the OFS. Of course the OFS will claim that they where just helping the local legitimate government deal with violent criminal rabble in a completely legal and moral way.

If it is then how is this a huge profit center for the league?

But the same argument works for the forces of the corp. if you are large enough and heavily enough armed. Particulary when there is no overall cerebral government that has any control over them.
Top

Return to Honorverse