Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Jonathan_S and 39 guests

Git your pencils out and design me a ship!

Join us in talking discussing all things Honor, including (but not limited to) tactics, favorite characters, and book discussions.
Re: Git your pencils out and design me a ship!
Post by Jonathan_S   » Tue Jul 19, 2016 4:15 pm

Jonathan_S
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 8793
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 2:01 pm
Location: Virginia, USA

Somtaaw wrote:
Jonathan_S wrote:Now if the SLN Admiral only has SDMs he's still screwed unless he takes advantage of the LACs reduced acceleration to run away.



This coming from the guy with the spreadsheets, exactly how many pods would a Shrike or Katana have to be towing, to reduce it's top acceleration from the ~800 gravity range, to somewhere a Frontier Fleet battlecruiser's going to be able to "run away" from the LACs? :lol:

I'm thinking, only about oh, 30 or 40 pods limpeted up against the LAC's, so we'd need a freighter or a full up podnought shadowing the CLAC to deploy enough pods that they'd be notciably slowed enough, FF can actively maneuver whether accepting action at all, or flat running away.
Now that I don't have data to plot accel curves for. But I thought I recalled RFC say towing even a couple pods cut a LAC's accel by something massive (50%?)
Top
Re: Git your pencils out and design me a ship!
Post by Somtaaw   » Tue Jul 19, 2016 4:21 pm

Somtaaw
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1204
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2014 11:36 am
Location: Canada

Jonathan_S wrote:
Somtaaw wrote:This coming from the guy with the spreadsheets, exactly how many pods would a Shrike or Katana have to be towing, to reduce it's top acceleration from the ~800 gravity range, to somewhere a Frontier Fleet battlecruiser's going to be able to "run away" from the LACs? :lol:

I'm thinking, only about oh, 30 or 40 pods limpeted up against the LAC's, so we'd need a freighter or a full up podnought shadowing the CLAC to deploy enough pods that they'd be notciably slowed enough, FF can actively maneuver whether accepting action at all, or flat running away.
Now that I don't have data to plot accel curves for. But I thought I recalled RFC say towing even a couple pods cut a LAC's accel by something massive (50%?)



:shock: holy crap, that's a massive reduction if it's true. Even the older designs, like the Reliant Honor used at Hancock Station could tow something like 10 pods without reducing her accel unacceptably. I don't have access to my books atm, so I cannot confirm quantity of towed pods, nor just how much accel she gave up to do so.

I was under the assumption LAC's could tow pods at similar ratio's to regular starships.
Top
Re: Git your pencils out and design me a ship!
Post by Weird Harold   » Tue Jul 19, 2016 4:40 pm

Weird Harold
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4478
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2014 10:25 pm
Location: "Lost Wages", NV

Somtaaw wrote:I was under the assumption LAC's could tow pods at similar ratio's to regular starships.


You have to remember that towing two pods is about the same as towing another LAC.

That and LACs aren't exactly overburdened with tractors; even with internal tractors daisy-chaining multiple pods, that limits how many they can tow.
.
.
.
Answers! I got lots of answers!

(Now if I could just find the right questions.)
Top
Re: Git your pencils out and design me a ship!
Post by kzt   » Tue Jul 19, 2016 4:51 pm

kzt
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 11360
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 8:18 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

Weird Harold wrote:You have to remember that towing two pods is about the same as towing another LAC.

That and LACs aren't exactly overburdened with tractors; even with internal tractors daisy-chaining multiple pods, that limits how many they can tow.

David has very carefully avoided talking about ho much a pod masses, but general belief here is it should be in the 3-5K ton range. So about 1/2 a LAC for 2.
Top
Re: Git your pencils out and design me a ship!
Post by Jonathan_S   » Tue Jul 19, 2016 4:52 pm

Jonathan_S
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 8793
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 2:01 pm
Location: Virginia, USA

Edit: I see some others chimed in on the mass side while I was trying to crunch volume numbers
Somtaaw wrote:
Jonathan_S wrote:Now that I don't have data to plot accel curves for. But I thought I recalled RFC say towing even a couple pods cut a LAC's accel by something massive (50%?)



:shock: holy crap, that's a massive reduction if it's true. Even the older designs, like the Reliant Honor used at Hancock Station could tow something like 10 pods without reducing her accel unacceptably. I don't have access to my books atm, so I cannot confirm quantity of towed pods, nor just how much accel she gave up to do so.

I was under the assumption LAC's could tow pods at similar ratio's to regular starships.
On the other hand the Reliant class BC masses roughly 44 times a Shrike, so if 3 pods were, say, 0.5% the mass of the Reliant they'd be almost 22% the mass of the Shrike!

I don't have pod tonnage handy, but a quick and dirty attempt to pull dimensions off of Maxxq's renders seem to show that a single flatpack pod must be at least 3,200 m^3 - and the volume of a rectangle that could hold the Shrike is 28,800 m^3, while the similar rectangle for a Reliant is 5,484,488 m^3.
So to a very rough approximation 3 pods are about equal to 11.1% the volume of the Shrike, while only 0.058% the volume of the Reliant.

Should be clear why tractoring 3 behind the ship might have a much more massive impact on the little LAC than on a big BC.
Top
Re: Git your pencils out and design me a ship!
Post by Weird Harold   » Tue Jul 19, 2016 5:43 pm

Weird Harold
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4478
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2014 10:25 pm
Location: "Lost Wages", NV

kzt wrote:David has very carefully avoided talking about ho much a pod masses, but general belief here is it should be in the 3-5K ton range. So about 1/2 a LAC for 2.


The only comparison I know of is the comparison of Wayfarer's pods with her series 282 LACs:

Honor Among Enemies
Chapter Thirty-three wrote:
Ginger Lewis watched her work section help the crew of Rail Number Three maneuver the pod back into Cargo One. The pod was smaller than a LAC, but it was much larger than a pinnace, and its designers had been far less concerned with ease of handling than with combat effectiveness. Nor was the situation helped by the fact that Wayfarer, as one of the first four ships to be fitted with the new, rail-launched version, had been forced to work out handling procedures more or less as she went. But each pod cost over three million dollars, which put their reuse high on BuShip's list of desirable achievements. And, Ginger admitted, having them available to shoot at another enemy made sense all on its own.


I've always read that as "about half the size of a LAC."

Still, whether 1/2 or 1/4 a pod is a much higher percentage of a LAC than it is of a Reliant class BC
.
.
.
Answers! I got lots of answers!

(Now if I could just find the right questions.)
Top
Re: Git your pencils out and design me a ship!
Post by SharkHunter   » Tue Jul 19, 2016 8:20 pm

SharkHunter
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1608
Joined: Fri Nov 14, 2014 3:53 pm
Location: Independence, Missouri

Well.. :twisted: We could handicap the RMN and make them tow the pods in with a tug... and Foraker's donkey system. Still need the LACs to make sure there's no golden BB shots on our big boy, but Capn' SD-puller can launch at say 45-50 million km with our SD(p) fire control equipped CLAC handling the merchandise.

"Y'll SLN folks over there. Might take me a chunk'o time to get up to speed, so if y'd be s'kind to either leave and never come back or scuttle your ships a'fore ya go, that'd be mighty fine".

Nope. Still not even odds. Geez, it's hard to give the 800lb gorilla a fighting chance. Dang neobarbs.
---------------------
All my posts are YMMV, IMHO, and welcoming polite discussion, extension, and rebuttal. This is the HonorVerse, after all
Top
Re: Git your pencils out and design me a ship!
Post by Vince   » Wed Jul 20, 2016 5:51 am

Vince
Vice Admiral

Posts: 1574
Joined: Fri Apr 09, 2010 11:43 pm

Somtaaw wrote:
Jonathan_S wrote:Now if the SLN Admiral only has SDMs he's still screwed unless he takes advantage of the LACs reduced acceleration to run away.



This coming from the guy with the spreadsheets, exactly how many pods would a Shrike or Katana have to be towing, to reduce it's top acceleration from the ~800 gravity range, to somewhere a Frontier Fleet battlecruiser's going to be able to "run away" from the LACs? :lol:

I'm thinking, only about oh, 30 or 40 pods limpeted up against the LAC's, so we'd need a freighter or a full up podnought shadowing the CLAC to deploy enough pods that they'd be notciably slowed enough, FF can actively maneuver whether accepting action at all, or flat running away.

Remember LACs (even modern Shrikes, Ferrets and Katanas) are small in comparison to hyper-capable ships, so they can't limpet pods against their hulls. They lack the wedge depth that larger ships have (you can get around the tractor problem by putting tractors in the pods, but the lack of wedge depth to have a pod limpeted against the hull is driven by the size of the pod and the ship's size):
Echoes of Honor, Chapter 33 wrote:In keeping with that recommendation, she'd also argued that the retention of their own ships' full acceleration capability was more important than putting the maximum possible number of pods in space. That liveliness in maneuver, after all, was the one advantage battleships held over ships of the wall, and she refused to throw it away. So rather than tow the pods astern, she'd suggested, they should take a page from the Manties' book in the Fourth Battle of Yeltsin and tractor the pods inside the wedges of their battleships, where they would have no effect on their acceleration curves. Their battlecruisers could tractor only two pods inside their wedges, and the heavy cruisers and destroyers lacked the tractors and wedge depth to tractor any inside at all, but that was fine with her.
Some of the squadron ops officers had hit the deckhead at the very suggestion, but she had simply waited them out with a cold, almost mechanical patience. And when the hubbub had settled, she'd pointed out that battleships had been designed as general purpose workhorses, which meant, among other things, that they had more tractors on a ton-for-ton basis than any other ship type in the Republican order of battle. Each of them could tractor eleven pods— more than most superdreadnoughts, actually—tight in against their hulls. That meant that when they actually deployed them, they could still put over forty-two hundred missiles into space at once, with another three hundred eighty from the battlecruisers. In the meantime, their entire task force's ability to maneuver at full acceleration would not only make them fleeter of foot but might actually convince the defenders that they hadn't brought along any pods until it was too late.

So it takes at least a battlecruiser size hull to have the wedge depth in order to tractor a pod tight in against its hull.

And for the actual numbers on how towing pods degrade a Shrike's acceleration:
David Weber on Shrikes wrote:On the electronics front, the new LACs have EW (and especially ECM) capabilities superior to most light cruisers. Coupled with their much smaller impeller signatures, which are already much less readily detectable than a DD's, that makes them far more stealthy than any other warship yet built. A SHRIKE mounts 3 tractors, which means it can tow up to 3 missile pods, but only with severe degradation of its acceleration curve. A SHRIKE with a single pod suffers a 20% reduction in accel; one with 2 pods suffers a 50% reduction; and one with 3 pods suffers an 80% reduction (max military power accel of only 127.2 gees). In addition, even a single pod on tow requires drive power levels which make stealth very difficult even with all the EW built into the new class.
Boldface and underlined text in the above quotes is my emphasis.
-------------------------------------------------------------
History does not repeat itself so much as it echoes.
Top
Re: Git your pencils out and design me a ship!
Post by Somtaaw   » Wed Jul 20, 2016 8:23 am

Somtaaw
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1204
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2014 11:36 am
Location: Canada

Good find Vince.

So for Jonathon's original premise, each LAC would have to be carrying at least two full pods to reduce their ~800 or so top acceleration, to the ~400ish that would actually start letting Solarian Naval units possibly dictating the range. And the same LAC's would have to add either a full third pod, or something else that would slow them by only a little bit more to permit Frontier Fleet to have total range control of a fight.


That's just madness how imbalanced the tech is, even against Frontier Fleet which was supposed to be receiving more regular updates than Battle Fleet's "Fort"noughts that never move.
Top
Re: Git your pencils out and design me a ship!
Post by cthia   » Mon Jul 25, 2016 8:57 am

cthia
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 14951
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 1:10 pm

Love this thread. Not technical enough myself to lay down specs for the Shewolves of the S&S to follow, but I can certainly add my own wish list. Which has been an SD(P)(LT). That's an SD(P) with true LAC towing capability. Can an SD(P) be realistically engineered to naturally tow its own set of LACs with next-gen all powerful reengineered LAC-specific tractors?

I'm thinking that the GA is well ahead of the competition on its LAC tech as much else. And being that Haven's production facilities still has its hymen intact can turn out LACS quicker that they can turn out carriers for them. So every wee bit helps.


A-slide:
Temporarily back from vacation. I'm not going to be inconsiderate and rub anyone's nose in it - considering that like myself before departure, many of you may not have had a meaningful vacation for far too long. Being workaholics (again like myself), or just too valuable to the company to depart for long stretches. Mine has been building and threatening to BLEVE for awhile - just until I hired new blood - trained, capable and sporting the correct credentials. Having said all that, my vacation, all seven legs of it... WOW! The world sure is eye candy! And as I said, one more leg to go at week's end! I know most of you all missed me, but for now, from the accumulative jet lag and ffun - I just wanna pull a Rip Van Winkle. As I say, a few Rip Van Winks is what I'd like to get, but my real boss has other plans for me around the home.

Son, your mother says I have to hang you. Personally I don't think this is a capital offense. But if I don't hang you, she's gonna hang me and frankly, I'm not the one in trouble. —cthia's father. Incident in ? Axiom of Common Sense
Top

Return to Honorverse