darrell wrote:Weird Harold wrote:Except you're NOT going to mount four Mk16 launchers in a ship the size you're proposing without TARDIS-tech.
how do you KNOW that Mk 16's won't work in an appropriately sized revolver launching tubes.
Mk16s might be workable in a revolver style launcher; although we've not seen a Revolver that fired fusion-powered missiles. Fusion-powered missiles require more peripheral equipment than capacitor missiles and more shielding and cofferdams than capacitor types.
The main problem is the size of your proposed ship.
Mk16s are big missiles -- too big for broadside mounts in a Roland. The support peripherals take up a lot of room -- too much room for "normal" launchers in a Roland's hammerheads.
You're talking about using Mk16s in a ship less than 1/4 the size of a Roland. You're going to need TARDIS-tech (EG The inside is larger than the outside. The classic Dr Who technology.)
You're going to have to use a smaller missile than the Mk16 and probably forego fusion-powered missiles.
OR
You're going to have to build a bigger ship.
Even if you go to a racked-pod setup or similar concept, you're going to need a bigger ship to fit anything except life support and an Mk16 filled flat-pack pod. If you're going to have CMs with a reasonable magazine capacity and PDLCs with a reasonable firing rate (faster firing means more emitters, which means bigger units.) you're going to need volume.
MaxQQ can probably come up with a minimum volume requirement for twenty Mk16s, but pods are already "nearly as large as a LAC" -- said about Wayfarer's pods and 282 series LACs, but probably still a fair comparison for later models. For Mk16s and Flat-pack pod that's 14 missiles rather than the 20 you propose.
Your proposed ship isn't that unreasonable with missiles that would actually fit -- nor that much different than what I proposed with LDDMs. It just won't work with Mk16s.