Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 62 guests

The end of the mesan alignement

Join us in talking discussing all things Honor, including (but not limited to) tactics, favorite characters, and book discussions.
Re: The end of the mesan alignement
Post by kzt   » Tue Jul 05, 2016 10:09 pm

kzt
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 11360
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 8:18 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

The whole slave thing is an unfortunate expediency, not a desired end-state.
Top
Re: The end of the mesan alignement
Post by BrightSoul   » Tue Jul 05, 2016 10:18 pm

BrightSoul
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1368
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 10:51 am

kzt wrote:The whole slave thing is an unfortunate expediency, not a desired end-state.


Unfortunately they are stuck with what they have right now. Most of the workforce they are relying on to build the MAN are slaves. They'll have to either phase out slavery, or create external slave societies along the same lines before opening up the society of Darius. If Darius is the only society of its kind they open themselves up to potential upheaval. That is especially true if a former slave or three end up leading their societies like Torch is heading towards.

A Slave is property, how do they react when they meet a former slave who owns a major corporation? Is a senior member of government, like say a Prime Minister?
Top
Re: The end of the mesan alignement
Post by BrightSoul   » Tue Jul 05, 2016 10:56 pm

BrightSoul
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1368
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 10:51 am

Now back to our regularly scheduled "wormhole assault" question.

I've had a wee idea. If a Frigate carries a hyper-generator in a LAC sized hull and has similar acceleration characteristics, could they be used from a CLAC? If you could launch a squadron of frigates before even getting the wedge reconfigured post transit would it be possible to get one out of the RZ and into hyper before the defenders could stop them all?

If that's the case then would it be possible to find out about the wormhole at Felix using such an attempt?
Top
Re: The end of the mesan alignement
Post by kzt   » Tue Jul 05, 2016 11:09 pm

kzt
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 11360
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 8:18 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

BrightSoul wrote:Now back to our regularly scheduled "wormhole assault" question.

I've had a wee idea. If a Frigate carries a hyper-generator in a LAC sized hull and has similar acceleration characteristics, could they be used from a CLAC? If you could launch a squadron of frigates before even getting the wedge reconfigured post transit would it be possible to get one out of the RZ and into hyper before the defenders could stop them all?

If that's the case then would it be possible to find out about the wormhole at Felix using such an attempt?

To survive the intense grav shear you need your sail deployed before you leave the mother ship. What happens when you deploy a sail inside another sail?

And you'll just get shot to pieces along with the mother ship.
Top
Re: The end of the mesan alignement
Post by BrightSoul   » Tue Jul 05, 2016 11:31 pm

BrightSoul
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1368
Joined: Sat Aug 22, 2009 10:51 am

kzt wrote:To survive the intense grav shear you need your sail deployed before you leave the mother ship. What happens when you deploy a sail inside another sail?

And you'll just get shot to pieces along with the mother ship.


The Grav Shear is during transit. You wouldn't be launching during transit rather immediately upon return to n-space. Could the launch systems be triggered upon arrival? Linked to sensor readings?
Top
Re: The end of the mesan alignement
Post by kzt   » Tue Jul 05, 2016 11:59 pm

kzt
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 11360
Joined: Sun Jan 10, 2010 8:18 pm
Location: Albuquerque, NM

BrightSoul wrote:The Grav Shear is during transit. You wouldn't be launching during transit rather immediately upon return to n-space. Could the launch systems be triggered upon arrival? Linked to sensor readings?

Until you exit the transit corridor you are in a grav wave. Which takes double digit seconds, during which you have no sidewalls or wedge. Oh, and the grav wave is small enough that laserheads fired from the outside are deep inside their effective range. Good luck, you'll need it.

Let me see if I can dig up David's posting on this...


Here we go. There is more in the entire thread, where David beat into us the futility of trying to find the far end of the Torch WH without someone telling you.

David Weber wrote: in http://forums.davidweber.net/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=3107&p=69199#p69199

A junction is usually considerably more than 5,000 km across (I think 300,000 qualifies as “considerably more than” 5,000. [G]). Each individual transit lane within a junction/terminus is much smaller than the total volume of the junction, however, and the final size of the transit lane depends on a whole bunch of factors we won’t go into right now. As a general rule of thumb, the “bigger” the junction (i.e., the greater the number of termini, the higher the max tonnage limit, etc.) the wider the junction as a whole is going to be, but the narrower the individual lanes are going to be and the futher into n-space the grav wave of each terminus is going to extend.

Because of the sheer forces involved in transiting a terminus of any type, the maneuver must be executed at a very low velocity and with minmal helm and acceleration changes. Transit speeds are higher for lighter ships (i.e., those with smaller hyper generators producing areas of effect with smaller radii).

If you look at the transits which have been described in the Honorverse, you will find that they have to be made on a very tightly and precisely controlled vector, which is why the transits made in ART without “local pilots” are possible only because the RMN (courtesy in no small part of the Manticoran merchant marine) has very, very good charts on the termini in question. Moreover, a terminus gravity wave is (1) much weaker than a “normal” h-space gravity wave (indeed, little more powerful than an impeller wedge) and (2) not of uniform power throughout its entire area of effect. The first point means that the wave’s “inertial sump” is no deeper than for an impeller wedge and the second point means that there are sharp gradients — effectively, fluctuations — throughout it’s “length,” and those two points in connection mean that the maximum possible acceleration is only about 50% of a ship’s max acceleration under impeller drive (i.e., about 210 gravities for most people’s SDs and about 286 gravities for a current generation Alliance SD). That, however, is the maximum safe acceleration for a typical single terminus “junction,” and the safe acceleration rate drops rather steeply as the number of termini go up, just as the maximum safe transit velocity is lower for a multi-terminus junction’s termini.

Without getting into all the gory details, the MWHJ is about 300,000 km across, and the Mantcore Astro Control Service currently has to handle six incoming and outgoing transit lanes. The good news is that the transit lanes are all separate from one another and that Junction ACS doesn’t have to worry about the vectors of ships leaving Manticore once they make transit. That is, they only have to “catch” the inbound ships and keep the space along their entry route clear. Each actual transit lane is around 9,000 km “across,” has a maximum safe transit “speed limit” of about 20 KPS, a maximum safe acceleration rate of about 60 gravities (for an SD), and extends about 26,000 km into the Junction. And any ship making transit must maintain profile within that transit lane until it clears its far end (i.e., an average of 26,000 km from the arrival threshhold). That means an SD trainsiting the Junction will arrive at a speed of 20 KPS and require 278 seconds (just over 4.5 minutes) to clear the lane, at which point it will be traveling at 175 KPS. Until it clears the lane, it cannot reconfigure to impeller wedge, but there is no limit (aside from simple physical volume constraints and the “reset” time) as to how many ships can be “in the lane” simultaneously. Since JACS imposes a minimum 20 second window for normal transits, there could be no more than 14 or so “in the lane” at any given moment, but we’re talking about SDs here, each of which destabilized the terminus for 113 seconds, which means there can be only two of them in the lane at any given moment.

This means each SD will be forced to leave its wedge and sidewalls down for the better part of 5 minutes, during which it must maintain a steady course and cannot fire impeller drive missiles, and is confined within a 9,000 km-wide “tube.” A despatch boat’s maximum safe transit speed is almost 50 KPS, however, and its max safe acceleration is around 200 gravities, so it could clear the lane in only 2 minutes and 19 seconds. Other ships would lie on a curve between the two extremes, depending upon their tonnages. And for single termini, where the wave is both shorter and less intense, the numbers would be much lower (hence the minimum 20 second number I believe I mentioned earlier, although that is an absolute minimum — for a despatch boat — under ideal conditions on a very “weak” terminus).

This, by the way, is a very siginificant point in the RMN’s decision to use Saganami-Cs and Rolands as its point units in seizing termini under Lacoön Two; they can get in a heck of a lot faster than even a Manty SD, they can put more of them through in the same time interval, and they have the range and the punch to take out even much heavier units once they’re into n-space on the other side. If they were going up against fortified termini which they are not in Lacoön, those CAs would be dead meat before they ever cleared the lanes . . . and anyone trying to take the termini back from them faces exactly the same constraints. This is a fundamental, underlying considertation which led the RMN to formulate Lacoön in the first place as a rapid, inexpensive way to seize control of the wormhole networks while making it extremely costly for anyone to take them back again. It is symptomatic of the changes in the conceptualization of interstellar warfighting doctrine that Manticore had figured this out while the SLN was still thinking in terms of ponderous, unstoppable advances through hyper-space. The notion of attacking through the MWHJ to support Fillareta was another example of how far behind the curve the SLN was in adjusting to the new realities; it was thinking of the MWHJ in the same way that it thought about its own termini’s defenses (or lack thereof) despite the fact that ONI knew (and had warned the mission planners) that the MWHJ was a whole different kind of animal.

The key point here for defensbility with mines and/or missile pods, however, is that the defender knows what the transit lanes are and can pretty much encase them in a cylinder of mines (or missile pods) as dense as it wants to make them and as long as the lane. Before the laser head, “boom or burn” warheads already had a standoff range of well over 9,000 km; first generation laserheads had standoff ranges of 30,000 km against active sidewalls and would make mincemeat out of bare alloy at 9,000 km (4,500, actually, since the entire lane is only 9,000 km across). The missile would never have to enter the gravity wave “tube” to attack, which means missile pods would work just fine in terminus defense, thank you.

And as far as “Mines would be the best solution against a mass tranist, and I have a solution that aparently DW hasn't thought of: slightly expand the sensors and programming on the mines. If the mines detect a mass transit, and the IFF does not respond correctly, blow the mass transit away” is concerned, that’s exactly what mines do . . . in wartime. Forts are to cover the termini in peacetime where a little computer glitch or hardward malfunction could have fairly significant consequences. This is what I’ve been describing from the very first book, so I’m a little at a loss to understand why “apparently DW hasn’t thought” of it.

As for assaults through properly defended termini under wartime conditions are concerned, however, the old cliché about “fshooting fish in a barrel” (in this case, almost literally) comes rather forcibly to mind.


"Oh, bother!" said Pooh, as Piglet came back from the dead.
Last edited by kzt on Wed Jul 06, 2016 12:08 am, edited 2 times in total.
Top
Re: The end of the mesan alignement
Post by MuonNeutrino   » Wed Jul 06, 2016 12:03 am

MuonNeutrino
Commander

Posts: 167
Joined: Tue Aug 06, 2013 12:40 pm

BrightSoul wrote:The Grav Shear is during transit.

Not quite - until you're fully out of the transit lane, you're essentially in a grav wave even though you're in normal space, and per Weber's statements exiting the transit lane takes on the order of a few minutes.

Until you're out of the transit lane, nothing without sails can survive, and so as kzt says, you can't launch anything since you'd need to bring up a sail before launching, which would destroy the mother ship.
_______________________________________________________
MuonNeutrino
Astronomer, teacher, gamer, and procrastinator extraordinaire
Top
Re: The end of the mesan alignement
Post by OrlandoNative   » Wed Jul 06, 2016 12:50 am

OrlandoNative
Captain (Junior Grade)

Posts: 361
Joined: Fri Feb 01, 2013 2:53 pm
Location: Florida

JohnRoth wrote:
SharkHunter wrote:Given that Manticore is not 'genocidal', I don't know that certain aspects of the alignment "end" or not. That said, I don't see the Detweilers, Anismova, or some of the other key players surviving. As characters go a long, tortured vicious death would be well deserved but RFC isn't going to do that. Blinding flash of fusion powered buh-bye, more likely, or the end of a rope or shredded by pulsar darts, mebbe.

The tougher plot questions: "you have a liberated planet (Mesa) that was gills deep in genetic slavery', and Torch... So those have a subplot to be dealt with then you have Darius which might as well be considered the Detweiler's blitzkrieg stash -- which has to get whacked by the Space Navies, but not all of the 2 billion inhabitants are on the ships, nor are they necessarily bad people But they are genies with distorted morals, so I don't know the answer for the rest of them.

Leaving the 25,000 or so members of the Onion, the leaders of the new "Renaissance Factor" whose constitution the Detweiler's have activated, etc. Those folks have to be defeated militarily and politically, and I don't think we'd be satisfied with a WWI-WWII setup where they get kinda smashed but could be back in 30 T-years, etc.

'T will be interesting, yes?


Mesa and Darius (pop. 3.9 billion, btw.) are very different problems. Mesa is a political nightmare that has a lot of very deeply ingrained divisions where contempt is reciprocated by hatred; a lot of its wealth comes from off-planet commerce that Admiral Henke is going to cut off and cauterize.

Darius has a functional society where most of the people of all four levels (alpha, beta, gamma and slaves) buy into the current system. It's almost got to have a command economy since a great deal of its economic output is going into military weaponry that doesn't return any economic gain. One possible solution there would be to simply blow its orbital infrastructure to space gas and threaten to drop a KEW on anything that looks like a space facility.

I don't think they'll do that, though. Since I think it's a weird hybrid of a participatory democracy (for the alphas, at least) and a top-down dictatorship, it'll probably get stuck with a transition board to evolve the situation in the direction of being a reasonable galactic citizen.


Mmm... while the Solarian League might be toast by that time, I think Mantacore respects the reason behind the crafting of the Eridani Edict. So probably no KEWs, which could be considered a violation. Especially something large enough to take out a whole "space facility" - which is a quite large area. Even if they used small "building buster" KEWs, the aggregate shock wave of enough to render a space facility unusable would most likely go over the acceptable limits. Remember, they chided the Frontier Fleet over taking out something the size of a *town* with a KEW. Even if a space facility was only the size to a major airport of today, those are usually the size of many small towns.

While Haven may have occasionally skirted close to the possibility back in the StateSec days, the Manties never have.
"Yield to temptation, it may not pass your way again."
Top
Re: The end of the mesan alignement
Post by JohnRoth   » Wed Jul 06, 2016 1:23 am

JohnRoth
Admiral

Posts: 2438
Joined: Sat Jun 25, 2011 6:54 am
Location: Centreville, VA, USA

I think you're headed in more or less the right direction. More comments in-line.

BrightSoul wrote:I don't know if we're heading in the right direction with this thread. We're focusing on finding and exposing Darius and I suspect that that misses the mark.

When I look at the problem that the Alignment faces and their actions with regards to the Republic (pre Duchene era) and I wonder if they can reveal Darius any time soon.

The entire reason for the Duchene plan was to discredit the only polity that was a fully functional government. Their concern was that an intact Republic of Haven would inevitable dilute their efforts to have the League reconstitute itself around the Factor.

With the Republic restored and allied with Manticore and Beowulf how does that change the dynamic? Posters have pointed out that Darius is how Mesa was supposed to work and therefore wouldn't be a victim of rebellion within the slave ranks. Not so fast.

The Alignment won't be able to open up about Darius until they have won. To expose the population of Darius (70% slaves IIRC) to the outside universe and its media and general population could very well expose them to the kind of ideas that could lead to social upheaval.


I think you're on to something. However, Darius has a very controlled media, with different groups having access to different kinds of information. If they open it up, the opening might be more like the Soviet Union did in the 30s, etc, where people were escorted around carefully prepped areas and never allowed contact with anyone who wasn't safe. The incident with Robert Heinlein is fairly well known.

BrightSoul wrote:Therefore they will have to keep Darius buttoned up until the outside society can support the existence of slaves as a class within their society. As it stands today Mannerheim et al, don't have an official, constitutionally established slave class. Even within the RF they don't have the systems in place for these slaves to interact with anyone outside the slave-holding society that is Darius or Mesa. They certainly don't want to show their slave class how the rest of the slave-holding societies of the time treat their counterparts.

To sum up, the Alignment is trapped by the continued existence of free societies.

Just my $0.02


Maybe Darius is also intended as a throwaway, like Mesa. That would suggest that the actual Alignment moved somewhere else.
Top
Re: The end of the mesan alignement
Post by darrell   » Wed Jul 06, 2016 7:24 am

darrell
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1390
Joined: Thu Jan 26, 2012 3:57 am

BrightSoul wrote:
kzt wrote:To survive the intense grav shear you need your sail deployed before you leave the mother ship. What happens when you deploy a sail inside another sail?

And you'll just get shot to pieces along with the mother ship.


The Grav Shear is during transit. You wouldn't be launching during transit rather immediately upon return to n-space. Could the launch systems be triggered upon arrival? Linked to sensor readings?


The grav shear also exists at the terminus. In transiting a wormhole there is 30-60 seconds both before and after the transit that you can't use a wedge. It is unclear if the grav sheer is so great that you need the sail to survive or the sheer will just destroy your impeller nodes and with it your ship if you switch from sail to wedge too early.

in either case, it won't help to launch drones inside the terminus, as you won't be able to accelerate the ship without destroying the drones, meaning that it will be longer before you will be able to switch your ship from sail to wedge, making your ship vulnerable longer.
<><><><><><><><><><><><>
Logic: an organized way to go wrong, with confidence.
Top

Return to Honorverse