Kytheros wrote:Somtaaw wrote:and since someone quoted him so I could see it... Skimper, CM's dont have ANY lasing rods. They don't even normally carry warheads at all, the counter missile's impeller wedge is it's one and only weapon.
It destroys missiles by physically ramming them, or at the very least coming close enough so the wedges collide, which even in a "worst case" for the owner of the missiles, can no longer maneuver, but MIGHT still be intact enough to detonate. But that's very unlikely, basically the entire missile "pulls a Tepes" and disintegrates after colliding with a CM wedge.
I presumed he was referring to the second stage of the Cataphracts, with a standard laserhead and a CM-type drive. And if you could do that, why not "upgun" the Viper laserhead in a similar manner.
Vipers could presumably benefit from the same sort of upgrades that are involved in the Mod G for the Mark 16, presupposing that the Viper wasn't originally designed with them. So could the Mark 23 and Mark 25.
But adding more lasing rods? No. Using a bigger warhead, maybe.
Vipers are the best missile that can be engineered into a small package that is roughly 1/4 the size of a shrike or DD missile. The viper warhead is basically just big enough to kill another LAC, in as small a package as possible. In order to upgrade the warhead, it would have to be much bigger, at least 50% the size of a DD shipkiller.
The catapharact A has a DD missile drive, a CM drive, and a DD power warhead, and is 50% bigger than a standard DD missile, about the size of a BC missile.
The catapharact B has a BC missile drive, a CM drive, and a BC power warhead, and is 50% bigger than a standard BC missile, about the size of a SD missile.
The catapharact C has a SD missile drive, a CM drive, and a SD power warhead, and is 50% bigger than a standard SD missile, and can only be launched from pods.