jchilds wrote:Imaginos1892 wrote:Capture a herd of space hamsters?
--------------------
Oh, no. You can't-a fool me. There ain't-a no Sanity Clause!
Regular or Miniature Giant Space Hamsters?
Baldur's Gate fan, I see.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 62 guests
Re: Fleet Tankers Or Oilers ... | |
---|---|
by MaxxQ » Wed May 11, 2016 9:22 am | |
MaxxQ
Posts: 1553
|
Baldur's Gate fan, I see. =================
Honorverse Art: http://maxxqbunine.deviantart.com/ Honorverse Video: http://youtu.be/fy8e-3lrKGE http://youtu.be/uEiGEeq8SiI http://youtu.be/i99Ufp_wAnQ http://youtu.be/byq68MjOlJU |
Top |
Re: Fleet Tankers Or Oilers ... | |
---|---|
by Duckk » Wed May 11, 2016 9:29 am | |
Duckk
Posts: 4200
|
Go for the eyes, Boo! GO FOR THE EYES!
-------------------------
Shields at 50%, taunting at 100%! - Tom Pope |
Top |
Re: Fleet Tankers Or Oilers ... | |
---|---|
by HungryKing » Wed May 11, 2016 9:48 am | |
HungryKing
Posts: 369
|
With regards to the LAC fission questions, there is another factor. All honorverse warships use stored power for many things. When the Peeps are talking about the LACs it was noted that even SDs use their main capacitors for wedge initiation: and that LACs, ton for ton, have the most capacitor of any warship. The modern LACs are actually running on 'battery power' during their attack runs. Space and mass usually given to the fusion reactor has been turned into more capacitor. The fission plant only needs to be able to barely exceed normal power draw levels. As for bunkerage levels three months for a Manty BC was noted as an extended time.
|
Top |
Re: Fleet Tankers Or Oilers ... | |
---|---|
by Louis R » Wed May 11, 2016 3:13 pm | |
Louis R
Posts: 1298
|
I did run the calculation once, just for the fun of it. Don't have the numbers handy, but at 60Hz, the skin is many, many cm deep. Deeper than the cross-section of any reasonably buildable bus-bar. Even if the builders are Lensmen.
|
Top |