Castenea wrote:Expert snuggler wrote:Even skipping the electric part, a large dam with turbines powering a hydraulic distribution system could supply dramatically more power than a bunch of water wheels.
The industry using that power would have to be right nearby of course.
Actually no, you would be better using shafts and belts, unless you needed the power in a way that was mobile (beyond moving along a shaft). For real life example of the power loss involved in hydraulic power transmission versus belt drive, stump grinders tend to get engines about 50 HP greater on hydraulic cutter powered models versus the belt driven models.
Hydraulic power was quite common until the 1920's. Like electricity, losses relate to flow rate. The lower the velocity in the pipe the lower the losses. The down side of this is you need big pipes (and somewhere to put the waste water). Electricity is cheaper because the pipes are smaller... (but you can make a hydraulic power system out of wood so pluses and minuses on both). For an emergent technological power water has distinct advantages so long as you don't want to move power up hill - which is where mechanical drive shafts come in (but are limited to round 5km)(yes, drive shafts 5km long have been used (mostly for pumping water..but that's mining for you)).