Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 50 guests
Using TF tech on Safehold... | |
---|---|
by n7axw » Sun Jan 17, 2016 6:51 pm | |
n7axw
Posts: 5997
|
Here is a subject that gets mentioned occasionally, but so far as I know has never been exhaustively discussed, at least in the past couple of years on the forum.
What sort of guidelines has there been to the use of TF tech on Safehold? The use of PICAs has been constant with both Merlin and Nimue. The use of snarcs and their parasites For recon... The use of the skimmer for getting Merlin and Nimue to and fro along with a handful of times for other persons. The use of the skimmer to destroy the NOG ship from which Thirsk's family is rescued. The use of the med unit in the cave to check on Sharley's pregnacy and to treat Stefny's family in the aftermath of their rescue from the camp. Implanting nanites in selected individuals to enhance healing and improve recovery time from wounds. Battlesteel for Haarahld and Cayleb's armor along with Cayleb's sword. Olyvya's "suit" enabling her to visit Nahrman in the cave. Nahrmans downloading which preserves him in VR... What else? Is there a pattern or guidelines here? Don - When any group seeks political power in God's name, both religion and politics are instantly corrupted.
|
Top |
Re: Using TF tech on Safehold... | |
---|---|
by evilauthor » Sun Jan 17, 2016 7:42 pm | |
evilauthor
Posts: 724
|
The two big ones:
1) It has to be kept hidden from orbiting sensors. IOW, if it has emissions that can't be mistaken for either natural phenomena or background noise, then it's not safe to use without possibly inviting a Rakurai strike. 2) It has to be kept hidden from the ignorant public. Which means it has to be disguised as innocuous natural and/or obviously mortal made objects. There's a bit of leeway here given the lack of actual forensic science (like the use of advanced chemical explosives), but nothing obviously "supernatural" should be going on, at least not anywhere they intend to leave live, credible witnesses to the event. On the flip side, entire fleets going up to mysterious magazine explosions or even just disappearing in a hurricane is verboten because it'd trip Safeholdian "supernatural!" alarms even if the individual events LOOK perfectly mundane. |
Top |
Re: Using TF tech on Safehold... | |
---|---|
by n7axw » Sun Jan 17, 2016 9:22 pm | |
n7axw
Posts: 5997
|
I suspect that even though Merlin is concerned about his skimmer drawing the attention of the orbital sensors, there is really not a problem. The sensors are seeing the skimmer, but Merlin is slipping through the same loophole that the archangels made for themselves to keep the OBS from blowing their arses out of space. Don - When any group seeks political power in God's name, both religion and politics are instantly corrupted.
|
Top |
Re: Using TF tech on Safehold... | |
---|---|
by JeffEngel » Mon Jan 18, 2016 7:45 am | |
JeffEngel
Posts: 2074
|
Maybe. However, the angels never worried about stealth - they showed off, with great bloomin' glows to wow the rubes. Merlin, by contrast, keeps the recon skimmers and air lorries carefully stealthy. So they may well fall under the OBS's detection threshold rather than into an exception category. Certainly Merlin would mean to avoid detection rather than count on an exception categorization there, unless he can somehow count on the exception categorization being utterly secure. Possibly there is that kind of exception categorization that would apply as a backstop, but the OBS has reacted to sufficiently un-stealthy potshots at it and hasn't reacted to far stealthier SNARC's - and recon skimmers - which suggests that it's the stealth doing the work in those cases. |
Top |
Re: Using TF tech on Safehold... | |
---|---|
by Keith_w » Mon Jan 18, 2016 7:53 am | |
Keith_w
Posts: 976
|
Is there textev of it reacting to anything? The only use that we have actual textev of is Alexandria and St. Khody's and those were directed. The rest is just discussion (Merlin and Nynian), we have no evidence regarding the circumstances of the actual occurrences that I am aware of, although the discussion implied to me that they were also directed attacks. --
A common mistake people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools. |
Top |
Re: Using TF tech on Safehold... | |
---|---|
by Joat42 » Mon Jan 18, 2016 8:10 am | |
Joat42
Posts: 2162
|
Yes, there is. Merlin sent a snarc to scout a platform out and it was shot down. Can't remember which book it was in but most likely OAR or BSRA. --- Jack of all trades and destructive tinkerer. Anyone who have simple solutions for complex problems is a fool. |
Top |
Re: Using TF tech on Safehold... | |
---|---|
by n7axw » Mon Jan 18, 2016 10:24 am | |
n7axw
Posts: 5997
|
OAR. Owl actually tried to get in close twice, once heavily stealthed. Both attempts were detected and destroyed, by a beam weapon, iirc. Don - When any group seeks political power in God's name, both religion and politics are instantly corrupted.
|
Top |
Re: Using TF tech on Safehold... | |
---|---|
by phillies » Mon Jan 18, 2016 1:23 pm | |
phillies
Posts: 2077
|
However, that was the defenses, not the bombardment of planet segment. |
Top |
Re: Using TF tech on Safehold... | |
---|---|
by n7axw » Mon Jan 18, 2016 6:32 pm | |
n7axw
Posts: 5997
|
You don't shoot a skimmer out of the air with kinetic weapons. Those are for pelting the ground. We know that the defensive package for the OBS uses beam weapons and possibly even guided missiles. That is how it would deal with a skinner.
Don - When any group seeks political power in God's name, both religion and politics are instantly corrupted.
|
Top |
Re: Using TF tech on Safehold... | |
---|---|
by Keith_w » Mon Jan 18, 2016 6:52 pm | |
Keith_w
Posts: 976
|
Sorry, let me be a little more explicit. There is no text evidence of the automated use of the the orbital bombardment system to bombard safehold. --
A common mistake people make when trying to design something completely foolproof is to underestimate the ingenuity of complete fools. |
Top |