Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 41 guests

Honorverse ramblings and musings

Join us in talking discussing all things Honor, including (but not limited to) tactics, favorite characters, and book discussions.
Re: Honorverse ramblings and musings
Post by Theemile   » Thu Jan 14, 2016 5:52 pm

Theemile
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5241
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 5:50 pm
Location: All over the Place - Now Serving Dublin, OH

cthia wrote:Thanks Theemile. Numbers is one thing that I was missing.

But the Peep doctrine of LAC attrition of 2+:1 had to be initially, with their first designs against Manty first designs.

What do you suppose the effective kill rate of Shrikes vs. Cimmeterres was? 3:1 at least? 6:1 vs. non Cimmeterres?


They never said the ratios needed - but they crammed well over 200 LACS in each of their SD sized CLACS, which would give at least a 2:1 ratio CLAC on CLAC, which says quite a bit about the minimum numbers they were planning for in their operations.

Also, they planned their attacks with advanced tactics like the Ziska and the triple ripple, which were designed specifically as force multipliers to remove the Manty advantages whenever possible - unfortunately, many of these became 1 off's as the Manties were quick to respond with counters of their own.

And, as Jonathan said, the original Cimmeterre was optimized for space superiority operations. The Havenites even created a "recon" variant whose only job would be a drone tender and was not intended to "mix it up" with anything if it could be avoided. The Manties were able to fit the scouting functions in all their LACs (Actually Manty Drones are so good and had FTL built in, so dedicated drone tenders (as data relays) were not needed).

So from the outset, the Havenites knew they couldn't win fighting "fair".
******
RFC said "refitting a Beowulfan SD to Manticoran standards would be just as difficult as refitting a standard SLN SD to those standards. In other words, it would be cheaper and faster to build new ships."
Top
Re: Honorverse ramblings and musings
Post by Jonathan_S   » Thu Jan 14, 2016 11:20 pm

Jonathan_S
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 8796
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 2:01 pm
Location: Virginia, USA

Theemile wrote:And, as Jonathan said, the original Cimmeterre was optimized for space superiority operations. [snip]
So from the outset, the Havenites knew they couldn't win fighting "fair".
Actually I'd argue the original Cimeterres were closer to a space denial system for LACs than a space superiority system.

Space superiority seems more like making it virtually impossible for the opposing side to operate their units; so much so that you can operated unarmed units in that area with near impunity. (Air supperiority opening up airspace to send in bombers or transports without any chance of interference from enemy fighters)

Haven didn't need to wipe space clean of Manticoran LACs nor enable that level of freedom of operation; a stalemate where neither side can freely operate LACs away from their heavier units would be a tactical victory for the first gen Cimeterres. Restoring the ability of the larger warships they're screening to perform their tasks without getting swarmed and gutted by Manticoran LAC strikes really seems to be their primary goal.
Top
Re: Honorverse ramblings and musings
Post by Duckk   » Fri Jan 15, 2016 8:31 am

Duckk
Site Admin

Posts: 4200
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:29 pm

AAC, Chapter 20:

Current doctrine called for engaging Manty LACs at minimum odds of four-to-one. Even at that level, Republican casualties would probably be heavy in a straight-up fight. It was hard to say for certain, because the only LAC-on-LAC engagements so far had been dominated by the Republic's surprise "Triple Ripple" tactic. But the MDM missile profiles employed against Captain Schneider at Zanzibar were chilling proof the Manties knew all about the Ripple. They'd undoubtedly adjusted their LAC tactics even more than their MDM doctrine, and Abercrombie didn't look forward to being the first Republican COLAC to discover exactly how they had.
-------------------------
Shields at 50%, taunting at 100%! - Tom Pope
Top
Re: Honorverse ramblings and musings
Post by Theemile   » Fri Jan 15, 2016 9:18 am

Theemile
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5241
Joined: Sat Feb 27, 2010 5:50 pm
Location: All over the Place - Now Serving Dublin, OH

Duckk wrote:AAC, Chapter 20:

Current doctrine called for engaging Manty LACs at minimum odds of four-to-one. Even at that level, Republican casualties would probably be heavy in a straight-up fight. It was hard to say for certain, because the only LAC-on-LAC engagements so far had been dominated by the Republic's surprise "Triple Ripple" tactic. But the MDM missile profiles employed against Captain Schneider at Zanzibar were chilling proof the Manties knew all about the Ripple. They'd undoubtedly adjusted their LAC tactics even more than their MDM doctrine, and Abercrombie didn't look forward to being the first Republican COLAC to discover exactly how they had.


Thanks Duckk!
******
RFC said "refitting a Beowulfan SD to Manticoran standards would be just as difficult as refitting a standard SLN SD to those standards. In other words, it would be cheaper and faster to build new ships."
Top
Re: Honorverse ramblings and musings
Post by cthia   » Sat Jan 16, 2016 7:57 am

cthia
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 14951
Joined: Thu Jan 23, 2014 1:10 pm

Theemile wrote:
Duckk wrote:AAC, Chapter 20:

Current doctrine called for engaging Manty LACs at minimum odds of four-to-one. Even at that level, Republican casualties would probably be heavy in a straight-up fight. It was hard to say for certain, because the only LAC-on-LAC engagements so far had been dominated by the Republic's surprise "Triple Ripple" tactic. But the MDM missile profiles employed against Captain Schneider at Zanzibar were chilling proof the Manties knew all about the Ripple. They'd undoubtedly adjusted their LAC tactics even more than their MDM doctrine, and Abercrombie didn't look forward to being the first Republican COLAC to discover exactly how they had.


Thanks Duckk!

Yes, thanks Duckk. I wasn't far off the mark -- perhaps not at all.

Can someone be so kind and give the gulf between the acceleration numbers of the two opponents' LACs? I admit to never having understood the mechanics of LAC on LAC engagements. Once the dust settles between the opposing missile storms, the Manty LACs will have blown right by not affording Peep LACs too many beam attempts -- one at best. Especially factoring in Manty LAC EW. Even if the acceleration is on a par, what difference would it make?

I'm mostly taking aim at a clearer picture. Not the LAC. Mostly.

Son, your mother says I have to hang you. Personally I don't think this is a capital offense. But if I don't hang you, she's gonna hang me and frankly, I'm not the one in trouble. —cthia's father. Incident in ? Axiom of Common Sense
Top
Re: Honorverse ramblings and musings
Post by JeffEngel   » Sat Jan 16, 2016 8:29 am

JeffEngel
Admiral

Posts: 2074
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2014 6:06 pm

Jonathan_S wrote:
Theemile wrote:And, as Jonathan said, the original Cimmeterre was optimized for space superiority operations. [snip]
So from the outset, the Havenites knew they couldn't win fighting "fair".
Actually I'd argue the original Cimeterres were closer to a space denial system for LACs than a space superiority system.

Space superiority seems more like making it virtually impossible for the opposing side to operate their units; so much so that you can operated unarmed units in that area with near impunity. (Air supperiority opening up airspace to send in bombers or transports without any chance of interference from enemy fighters)
It's an instance of the drift of usage of "[area] superiority", I think, particularly from a state of affairs you take as a goal to the sort of mission or unit intended to achieve it or approach it.

The ideal for a space "superiority" design is to achieve space superiority, defined as making the area perfectly safe for your X's and perfectly unsafe for their X's. In practice, what with the enemy having the nefarious purpose, frequently achieved, of messing up your plans, the practical goal of a superiority design is just countering the enemy's X's by killing them, disabling them, or driving them off under threat thereof.

Haven didn't need to wipe space clean of Manticoran LACs nor enable that level of freedom of operation; a stalemate where neither side can freely operate LACs away from their heavier units would be a tactical victory for the first gen Cimeterres. Restoring the ability of the larger warships they're screening to perform their tasks without getting swarmed and gutted by Manticoran LAC strikes really seems to be their primary goal.

Exactly right there, yup. More than that even: achieving that much is the maximum expectation of them, outside of circumstances where the sole hostile force is LAC's and the Cimeterres have the numbers or circumstances to eliminate them.
Top
Re: Honorverse ramblings and musings
Post by Jonathan_S   » Sat Jan 16, 2016 10:08 am

Jonathan_S
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 8796
Joined: Fri Jun 24, 2011 2:01 pm
Location: Virginia, USA

cthia wrote:
Can someone be so kind and give the gulf between the acceleration numbers of the two opponents' LACs? I admit to never having understood the mechanics of LAC on LAC engagements. Once the dust settles between the opposing missile storms, the Manty LACs will have blown right by not affording Peep LACs too many beam attempts -- one at best. Especially factoring in Manty LAC EW. Even if the acceleration is on a par, what difference would it make?

I'm mostly taking aim at a clearer picture. Not the LAC. Mostly.
i don't have my references handy but my recollection is that even when we saw the first generation Cimetteres in War of Honor they were capable of over 600g. Which puts them at least in the same ballpark as the Shrikes and Ferrets. (And massively quicker than the 'old style' LACs which could only do about 409g (at zero safety margin).
Top
Re: Honorverse ramblings and musings
Post by Somtaaw   » Sat Jan 16, 2016 11:25 am

Somtaaw
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1204
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2014 11:36 am
Location: Canada

Jonathan_S wrote:
cthia wrote:
Can someone be so kind and give the gulf between the acceleration numbers of the two opponents' LACs? I admit to never having understood the mechanics of LAC on LAC engagements. Once the dust settles between the opposing missile storms, the Manty LACs will have blown right by not affording Peep LACs too many beam attempts -- one at best. Especially factoring in Manty LAC EW. Even if the acceleration is on a par, what difference would it make?

I'm mostly taking aim at a clearer picture. Not the LAC. Mostly.
i don't have my references handy but my recollection is that even when we saw the first generation Cimetteres in War of Honor they were capable of over 600g. Which puts them at least in the same ballpark as the Shrikes and Ferrets. (And massively quicker than the 'old style' LACs which could only do about 409g (at zero safety margin).



I think those were second-gen Cimeterre's. Post-Thunderbolt era, when they started building them as Cimeterre-Alpha's and Cimeterre-Beta's, which were the respective knockoff's of Shrike's and Ferret's.


And when it really comes down to it, for the LAC on LAC death orgies, the Ferret (and Katana's) have the marked edge over Shrike grasers. They don't even have to pretend to be a light cruiser. Think Theisman during the Battle of Blackbird, whipping up on one side to use his wedge to block lasers, and then dropping right back down to launch a broadside of missiles. LAC's are even more agile than Theisman's CL was, and not only do they not have "broadsides" but they launch off-bore. If Ferrets are similar in design to Shrike's, they can launch from their four (or was it five?) rotating missile batteries, without ever rolling and giving a Shrike a chance to shoot through their sidewalls.


Shrikes, and Cimeterre-Alpha's with their graser/laser, are for attacking nearly any hyper-ships; while Ferrets, Cimeterre-Beta's, and Katana's are for small hyper-ships and other LAC's.
Top
Re: Honorverse ramblings and musings
Post by Louis R   » Sat Jan 16, 2016 12:49 pm

Louis R
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1298
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2015 9:25 pm

It's rather trickier than that: LACs don't [currently] carry any telemetry-relay kit, so they can't fire at targets covered by their own wedges unless they are content to shoot blind.


Somtaaw wrote:
I think those were second-gen Cimeterre's. Post-Thunderbolt era, when they started building them as Cimeterre-Alpha's and Cimeterre-Beta's, which were the respective knockoff's of Shrike's and Ferret's.


And when it really comes down to it, for the LAC on LAC death orgies, the Ferret (and Katana's) have the marked edge over Shrike grasers. They don't even have to pretend to be a light cruiser. Think Theisman during the Battle of Blackbird, whipping up on one side to use his wedge to block lasers, and then dropping right back down to launch a broadside of missiles. LAC's are even more agile than Theisman's CL was, and not only do they not have "broadsides" but they launch off-bore. If Ferrets are similar in design to Shrike's, they can launch from their four (or was it five?) rotating missile batteries, without ever rolling and giving a Shrike a chance to shoot through their sidewalls.


Shrikes, and Cimeterre-Alpha's with their graser/laser, are for attacking nearly any hyper-ships; while Ferrets, Cimeterre-Beta's, and Katana's are for small hyper-ships and other LAC's.
Top
Re: Honorverse ramblings and musings
Post by Somtaaw   » Sat Jan 16, 2016 1:49 pm

Somtaaw
Rear Admiral

Posts: 1204
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2014 11:36 am
Location: Canada

They were doing it during the Second Battle of Hancock, when the original Shrike's were still being tested, pre-Buttercup.

If they could do it pre-Buttercup, they can certainly do it post-Thunderbolt, and post-Raging Justice. What they couldn't do, was fire their missiles with their bow walls up. Whether they can fire their missiles with the newer, two-stage bucklers is something we'd need either David himself or the Bu9 folks to answer.

And that's totally excluding the little snippit in AAC, when we first see the Viper's being used. They're fire and forget, they guide themselves without the LAC needing to guide them in. Ferret's can load and fire Vipers, and with the Grand Alliance the Cimeterre-Betas could be refitted to do the same.

The Viper was about two-thirds the size of a standard LAC missile, but it was quite different. It carried a much smaller warhead, without the multiple lasing rods of a conventional warhead, in order to incorporate significantly better seekers and an enhanced AI. And it also was designed for engagements at much shorter ranges. Engagements in which massive acceleration, agility, and the ability to reach targets quickly were vastly more important than endurance. Which was why the Viper used the same drive systems as the Mark 31 counter-missile.

-snip-

It was the first time they'd ever been used against live targets, and even Dillinger was a bit surprised by how well they performed. Their AIs were better than those of any previous missile remotely close to their size, and those AIs had been carefully optimized to go after small, fast, fragile targets. They were far more capable of independent engagements, with less need for telemetry links to the vessels which had launched them. After all, LAC EW—or, at least, the Havenite version of it—was much less capable than that of a starship. There was less need for fire control officers to correct for the sort of sophisticated razzle-dazzle larger ships could perform, and their shorter powered envelope meant the Vipers' sensors had a much better look at their target when they were launched.

In effect, they were launch-and-forget weapons, which saw to their own midcourse corrections, and the Katanas were free to maneuver, and to employ all of their fire control links for counter-missiles,


Bolded the important bits. So missile LAC's that are capable of firing Vipers, have a very distinct advantage of being able to fight rolled up on their side, whereas the energy-weapon armed LAC's like the Shrike are nearly impotent other than firing their own Vipers back.

Now I'll admit, so far as we've seen neither Shrikes nor Ferrets load, or are even capable of firing Vipers. We've only seen the evidence that Katana's, and "newer construction" for hyper-capable ships fire Vipers. The newer construction could imply refitted LAC's are capable, if so refitted.

Louis R wrote:It's rather trickier than that: LACs don't [currently] carry any telemetry-relay kit, so they can't fire at targets covered by their own wedges unless they are content to shoot blind.


Somtaaw wrote:
I think those were second-gen Cimeterre's. Post-Thunderbolt era, when they started building them as Cimeterre-Alpha's and Cimeterre-Beta's, which were the respective knockoff's of Shrike's and Ferret's.


And when it really comes down to it, for the LAC on LAC death orgies, the Ferret (and Katana's) have the marked edge over Shrike grasers. They don't even have to pretend to be a light cruiser. Think Theisman during the Battle of Blackbird, whipping up on one side to use his wedge to block lasers, and then dropping right back down to launch a broadside of missiles. LAC's are even more agile than Theisman's CL was, and not only do they not have "broadsides" but they launch off-bore. If Ferrets are similar in design to Shrike's, they can launch from their four (or was it five?) rotating missile batteries, without ever rolling and giving a Shrike a chance to shoot through their sidewalls.


Shrikes, and Cimeterre-Alpha's with their graser/laser, are for attacking nearly any hyper-ships; while Ferrets, Cimeterre-Beta's, and Katana's are for small hyper-ships and other LAC's.
Top

Return to Honorverse