Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 15 guests

solar power

For anyone who might want to have a side conversation...you're welcome here!
Re: Better mpg vehicles.
Post by DDHvi   » Thu Dec 24, 2015 11:29 pm

DDHvi
Captain (Junior Grade)

Posts: 365
Joined: Mon Dec 15, 2014 8:16 pm

Daryl wrote:True. I knew someone who made a big deal out of replacing all of their light bulbs with LCDs. Good idea as a 10w LCD does the job of a 60w incandescent, but 10 of them save only 500w an hour.
He drove a petrol V8 Land Cruiser with 220KW, which produced 220,000wh. Not sure of the carbon but would be equivalent to wattage difference.


Elio Motors is supposed to be coming out with an enclosed 2 person autocycle for (bare bones) about U$7,000 next year. It is supposed to get around 80 Mpg.

http://www.thetruthaboutcars.com/2013/0 ... -the-game/

Mother Earth News magazine, a few issues back, reported on a DIY project that made a 100mpg car using as much standard parts as possible. I once read of a contest to produce the best mpg vehicle carrying one person - the winner looked like a streamlined bomb on bicycle wheels, at over 3,000 mpg. The primary secret was combining minimum friction of all types with a very small prime mover - a model airplane engine. Maximum speed of 15 MPH, and a driving cycle of wide open acceleration, then turning the engine off and coasting.

Maybe instead of having hot rod contests, we should have "long rod" contests.
Douglas Hvistendahl
Retired technical nerd
ddhviste@drtel.net

Dumb mistakes are very irritating.
Smart mistakes go on forever
Unless you test your assumptions!
Top
Re: solar power
Post by Daryl   » Sun Dec 27, 2015 11:12 pm

Daryl
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 3562
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 1:57 am
Location: Queensland Australia

Received my quarterly electricity account on christmass eve. $98 in credit after they paid me out on the last account.
Top
Re: solar power
Post by Spacekiwi   » Tue Dec 29, 2015 12:33 am

Spacekiwi
Admiral

Posts: 2634
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2011 3:08 am
Location: New Zealand

Nice. so that was your quarters power bill paid, pluis another 100 or so a quarter if im reading that right?



Daryl wrote:Received my quarterly electricity account on christmass eve. $98 in credit after they paid me out on the last account.
`
Image


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
its not paranoia if its justified... :D
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Top
Re: solar power
Post by Daryl   » Tue Dec 29, 2015 3:42 am

Daryl
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 3562
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 1:57 am
Location: Queensland Australia

As always you are right.
We don't stint in our life style but are sensible. As an example we don't automatically switch lights off when we leave a room, but the lights are leds. We have a 50 inch plasma, but it and the PVR only use a fraction of a watt on standby.

Spacekiwi wrote:Nice. so that was your quarters power bill paid, pluis another 100 or so a quarter if im reading that right?



Daryl wrote:Received my quarterly electricity account on christmass eve. $98 in credit after they paid me out on the last account.
Top
Re: solar power
Post by Spacekiwi   » Tue Dec 29, 2015 5:14 pm

Spacekiwi
Admiral

Posts: 2634
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2011 3:08 am
Location: New Zealand

Very nice. Good to see it works for you.

I plan to install one when I own my home, as opposed to rent, asap. with the way power costs are always rising here, it should well pay off itself quickly. Power prices have risen about 45 to 50 % since 2000, so even a 20% rise over 25 years in power and a continuing drop every 5 years of say 5 to 15% will lead to a very economical solar system when i can afford a mortgage. :) With continuation of the 4% PA price rises in power, and 7% PA reduction in solar costs, and thats even quicker payoffs. :)



Daryl wrote:As always you are right.
We don't stint in our life style but are sensible. As an example we don't automatically switch lights off when we leave a room, but the lights are leds. We have a 50 inch plasma, but it and the PVR only use a fraction of a watt on standby.
`
Image


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
its not paranoia if its justified... :D
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Top
Re: solar power
Post by thinkstoomuch   » Sat Mar 26, 2016 9:36 am

thinkstoomuch
Admiral

Posts: 2727
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 1:05 pm
Location: United States of America

A neat site I found. Enphase has one too but I didn't like it as much.

https://monitoring.solaredge.com/solaredge-web/p/login#

Click on "Public Sites" at the bottom.

If you are interested in doing it you can find nearby installations and see how they are doing(sorry SK they don't have any currently in NZ, I looked).

Granted it is a company promo site but if the owner allows (at varying degrees) a look at; production by day, month year, physical layout, type of panels used, inverters and more.

For example this site in Ocala, Florida. technically 2 as it uses 2 inverters consisting of 4 strings and 64 panels.

https://monitoringpublic.solaredge.com/ ... /dashboard

https://monitoringpublic.solaredge.com/ ... /dashboard

or this one in Royal Palm Beach, Florida.

https://monitoringpublic.solaredge.com/ ... /dashboard

For the other end of the information available.

Just more information for pendants out there. :lol:

Have fun,
T2M
-----------------------
Q: “How can something be worth more than it costs? Isn’t everything ‘worth’ what it costs?”
A: “No. That’s just the price. ...
Christopher Anvil from Top Line in "War Games"
Top
Re: solar power
Post by Spacekiwi   » Mon Mar 28, 2016 5:00 am

Spacekiwi
Admiral

Posts: 2634
Joined: Sun Aug 07, 2011 3:08 am
Location: New Zealand

Cheers T2m.

So, looking at one example, (https://monitoringpublic.solaredge.com/solaredge-web/p/site/public?name=20%20maud%20st#/dashboard), this Queensland spot has a 5kw system, and in 2015, produced 4.31MW of power. At a standard use rate (Qld's tariff 11), the power rate is 22.2c/kw. This is $960 saved in one year. 8.3mw in 2014 was $1840 saved. Say $1300 a year. At the current estimated costs from the Gun guns guns post of mine, (p147 in the thread) solar costs for this system would be 9700 AUD. That works out to a payback period of between 5 years at best output, and 10 years at worst output, with about 7.5 years as an average. Thats an insane return on your investment, starting at 10%, and hitting up to 20%! And unless electricity prices drop, and really really drop, for a long period of time, you can consider it an effective risk free return...... And against a 10% guaranteed PA return, with all returns reinvested, still has an overall return of 2,200.

thinkstoomuch wrote:A neat site I found. Enphase has one too but I didn't like it as much.

https://monitoring.solaredge.com/solaredge-web/p/login#

Click on "Public Sites" at the bottom.

If you are interested in doing it you can find nearby installations and see how they are doing(sorry SK they don't have any currently in NZ, I looked).

Granted it is a company promo site but if the owner allows (at varying degrees) a look at; production by day, month year, physical layout, type of panels used, inverters and more.

For example this site in Ocala, Florida. technically 2 as it uses 2 inverters consisting of 4 strings and 64 panels.

https://monitoringpublic.solaredge.com/ ... /dashboard

https://monitoringpublic.solaredge.com/ ... /dashboard

or this one in Royal Palm Beach, Florida.

https://monitoringpublic.solaredge.com/ ... /dashboard

For the other end of the information available.

Just more information for pendants out there. :lol:

Have fun,
T2M
`
Image


~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
its not paranoia if its justified... :D
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Top
Re: solar power
Post by Daryl   » Mon Mar 28, 2016 6:17 am

Daryl
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 3562
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 1:57 am
Location: Queensland Australia

Plus Spacekiwi, if you invest your $9700 in a bank account and somehow get 10%, your $970 is taxed. If at 30% then you end up with $679, then if you are on our aged pension you lose 50% or $485 leaving $194.
Mmm, wonder if I'll put my windfall of $9700 into the bank account to net $194, or get solar panels & save $970 in bills? And that's at 10% which is rare nowadays.
Top
Re: solar power
Post by John Prigent   » Mon Mar 28, 2016 7:08 am

John Prigent
Captain of the List

Posts: 592
Joined: Sun Aug 09, 2009 8:05 am
Location: Sussex, England

I looked at solar panels for my place in Sussex, UK. Quite apart from my dislike of a system that subsidises them as the cost of very other electricity user, which is slowly being wound down and I sincerely hope will be cancelled entirely, it simply wasn't economic. Given the sunlight record in this area, the payback period was not only longer than I expect to live, it was longer than the projected life of the panels!
Cheers
John
Top
Re: solar power
Post by thinkstoomuch   » Mon Mar 28, 2016 8:34 am

thinkstoomuch
Admiral

Posts: 2727
Joined: Mon Aug 24, 2009 1:05 pm
Location: United States of America

Spacekiwi wrote:Cheers T2m.

So, looking at one example, (https://monitoringpublic.solaredge.com/solaredge-web/p/site/public?name=20%20maud%20st#/dashboard), this Queensland spot has a 5kw system, and in 2015, produced 4.31MW of power. At a standard use rate (Qld's tariff 11), the power rate is 22.2c/kw. This is $960 saved in one year. 8.3mw in 2014 was $1840 saved. Say $1300 a year. At the current estimated costs from the Gun guns guns post of mine, (p147 in the thread) solar costs for this system would be 9700 AUD. That works out to a payback period of between 5 years at best output, and 10 years at worst output, with about 7.5 years as an average. Thats an insane return on your investment, starting at 10%, and hitting up to 20%! And unless electricity prices drop, and really really drop, for a long period of time, you can consider it an effective risk free return...... And against a 10% guaranteed PA return, with all returns reinvested, still has an overall return of 2,200.


A couple of quibbles no real disagreement.

Did you notice that the system produced no power in March 2016 and 2015? Or February of 2015? Not exactly no risk.

People really need to look at the individual electricity bill and local utility buy back rates. Daryl might be able to give us some info on.

That local buy back rate is subject to change. Ask Hawaii, Nevada, or ... .

But my problem was for US use. From March 2015 to February 2016 electric bill was $443.17 TOTAL taxes and connection fee included($90.84 which will not go away). That Connection fee actually increased with the latest rate decrease the third one in the last 2 years.

My useage: Roughly 3,662 kWH a year. For this system it produced 12,647 in 2014 and 2015. So I sell back the excess, at the rate of $0.02559. Which earns me $136. Or average earning of $68 a year.

So total economic value of $420 a month. Divided into $9,700 equals 23.1 years not counting installation.

Actually this system is similar to what I can expect out of one installed on my roof according to PVWatts, http://pvwatts.nrel.gov/pvwatts.php, (only works in northern hemisphere :( ) a 5 kw system would generate ~7,8 MWH. Counting the fact that >10% went away during no output months.



Another example I meant to include in that last post.

http://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/bro ... req=M&pin=

It is a 10MW utility scale plant ~120 miles up the coast. Of curse the Array is actually 11.5 MWpdc.

Sort of works for me. Installed in 2010 but starting in full years; 2011 18842 MWH, 2012 18,508 MWH,
2013 18,169 MWH, 2014 17,551 MWH, 2015 17,682.

If I divide that by 11,500 I can get what a 1 KW system on the east coast of Florida , hopefully optimally placed, can expect. So in it would output 1.638434783 kWH, 1.609391304 kWH, 1.579913043 kWH, 1.526173913 kWH, and 1.537565217 kWH respectively. (PVWats for that location with SolarAnywhere data would be 1,802 KWH(with my roof tilt and orientation).) <shrug>

Which also shows real world data and age degradation. It does agree with the PVWatts output of 1.558 kwh for a 1 kWp roof install or 1,791 kwh for a 1.15 kWp.


Yep I am anal retentive. Just FYI for my roof tilt is 12.3 degrees and orientation is 182. Max capacity depending on zoning requirements for a 170 mph wind zone is 24 60 cell panels (actually 4 arrays around roof penetrations). 72 cell panels do not fit right depending on zoning requirements.

Rough numbers from Iron Mountain design assistant is that racking is going to cost around $0.40 to $0.60 per watt.

Need to talk to county and find that out more detail of zoning requirements. Talk about a zoo, zoning requirements, if you don't deal with them constantly will drive a person to drink. Then again Hurricane Andrew points to the reasons that they are in place.

Have fun,
T2M

PS That 2.6 kwp system I quoted up thread went down ~$100 since then. Today it is $5,428. No roof attachment points though so not total cost required. :) Same site has a 5.2 kwp would be $9,136. With Solaredge systems.

PPS after 2.5 hours excuse the editing. I's done. :lol:
-----------------------
Q: “How can something be worth more than it costs? Isn’t everything ‘worth’ what it costs?”
A: “No. That’s just the price. ...
Christopher Anvil from Top Line in "War Games"
Top

Return to Free-Range Topics...