cthia wrote:Hutch wrote:Too early for me to do any thinking, so I'll simply mention my stance on certain sagas that I read/view:
The Honorverse understands and respects physics, except where the power of plot drives it, and even then the 'fiddly-bits" usually try to fit into the known universe.
Star Trek uses the word physics quite a lot, but doesn't really seem to understand what it really means.
Star Wars tell physics to take a flying leap and does whatever they damn well please.
Know that's not an answer to your OP, but I got up at 4am and I'm grumpy...
LOL... funny Hutch. Have a jar of java. Hot. Black. Strong.
Funny how we take physics digs at our Sci-Fi.
But we say nothing when our super heroes defy... defynition. Nobody says anything when Supergirl or the Flash swoops down and rescues someone out from under a hurtling object with an acceleration that compensators can't handle.
Honorverse ships should be named after super heroes.
Fearless should have been named RMN
Super Girl. Terekov's ship should have been RMN
Super Man. The MAlign ship would have been MA
Invisible girl. The Andermani ship that shadowed
Jessica Epps would have been the IAN
Watcher. The Haven Q-ship should have been the RHN
Dr. Doom.At least one League ship should have been named SLN Batman, if only to facilitate... "Holy Bat crap, Robin. Look at that massive launch!”
Nimitz doesn't defy belief because we all know he's a Mutant Ninja Cat.
JeffEngel wrote:Just what we're supposed to take seriously - e.g., physics - in a story varies by genre. Star Trek kind of invites trying to take real-world physics seriously, at least as a starting point. So does the Honorverse. It gets adjusted as need be, but if it gets adjusted more than need be, a typical audience member may start frowning.
Star Wars and superhero stuff does not even invite that perspective. All we ask there is that it's consistent with established fact within the universe, and sometimes we'll give it a pass then. The standard becomes much more a matter of sheer storytelling.
Also, Q-ships are supposed to be innocuous. Ya name a freighter Dr. Doom and pirates are going to take a careful second or third look at it!
I can't seriously take the taking of physics too seriously.
1. It hampers my enjoyment of the media...
2. Much of what we enjoy today as reality was indeed just Fantasy yesterday. So we put the cart before the horse and risk the chance of ruining a storyline by needlessly putting the cart before the horse. Or we force a respective author to pigeonhole their art under the brand of Fantasy. Whereby Sci-Fi
is Fiction
is Fantasy.
<shrugs insouciantly>3. It delays and sometimes even hampers many an author from delivering a good story because of the perception -- and accompanying weight -- of its perceived physics veracity.
1. ...
Because of the lack of the overbearing weight of truth in physics, Fantasies tend to deliver more meat on the bone. IMO.