n7axw wrote:Randomiser wrote:
They don't necessarily need better stealth, just a platform with better survivability and bigger 'guns' than the remote previously used; something designed for combat rather than stealthy reconnaisance perhaps, or maybe many more of them, or who knows what? I find it hard to believe that a TF dreadnought or two couldn't take down a relatively fixed orbital planetary bombardment system. In that sense the Good Guys(tm) don't need to do original research, just some engineering to find a way of applying known principles to this situation. (A bit like building a PICA without the ten day limit) Perhaps 'surely' in my previous post was a mite strong, but it has to be within the bounds of reasonable possibility. Especially given how limited OWL was at the time it was asked about tackling the OBS.
Yeah. A couple of months devoted to the problem in compressed time now that he's self aware could make a real difference in defining the perameters of the problem along with coming up with an inventory of resources needed to deal with it.
When I looked at that paragraph in OAR where Owl tells Merlin that nothing he has on hand can penetrate the OBS's defenses, there was nothing that precluded a future solution--only that it couldn't be done at that moment in time.
Then, too, consider that Owl is a tactical AI. That could put him a leg up on finding a solution.
Don
-
Maybe I didn’t make my points too well. Thomas Edison famously said that genius is one percent inspiration, ninety-nine percent perspiration. I completely agree with you that compressed time and so on is a great starter for the 99% perspiration, but you still need the 1% inspiration to set the process off, and I have doubts that that could come from a machine.
Moreover, compressed time experimentation is basically a form of mathematical modelling, and I can assure you that mathematical modelling can only take you so far. There is a difference between virtual reality and the real thing and mathematical models need to be verified in real life. As an example, ask yourself how accurate is your local weather forecast? I’ll guarantee it’s wrong part of the time, and they’ve been trying to model that for years. Where mathematical models are invaluable is in pointing out the best places to start looking for answers, but the final answers have to come from actual experiments.
Lastly, I fully accept that something could be made which would blow an OBS system apart, but I cannot see how can one could be made, got into orbit, and used effectively without electronics and electricity for the control systems. Possibly known technology would suffice to do that. But if new inventions and developments need to be made in those areas, unless I misunderstand the situation on Safehold, the OBS system is likely to terminate the experiments with extreme prejudice as soon as the radiation signature of the necessary research becomes sufficiently obvious.
.