Jonathan_S wrote:cthia wrote:
But my initial thought is being overlooked. I never said anything about settling the planets. My question regards the failure of the League to separate the military importance of any wormhole junction from the planet proper by some mumbo dumbo legal definition of some sort. It is exclusively the wormholes that I find it difficult to believe that the SLN didn't seize -- early on -- setting an early precedent that the 'Mother World' cannot afford an anomaly of potential military importance to remain uncontrolled by it. Piss on Manticore if they'd like -- ("we don't want the planet, we want the junctions.")
No different than what Manticore is doing now?
Can you elaborate on what you see as the military importance of the initial Manticoran junction from the League members point of view?
Even then it's suicide to assault through a defended wormhole so it's a link between Beowulf and Manticore. But not one that can be used as an invasion route. And without the later discoveries it only leads from the League deeper into unoccupied space. It doesn't (yet) allow quick access around the League perimeter - that was an unprecedented situation (meaning they couldn't reasonably foresee it) and that happened slowly over time as other wormholes out in the verge were discovered.
I just don't see where the early League navy or mandarins would see it as a military threat or advantage. Quick access to nowhere at the risk of getting much of their SLN battleships destroyed if Manticore fought the transit.
Sure.
The League owned Beowulf as far as they
were concerned. A wormhole junction from Manticore to Beowulf gives the neobarbs the advantage of the
'interior position' to attack a forward deployment of the SLN.
I tried in another post to embolden RFCs claim of what tactical niceties abound in having benefit of the interior position as McQueen had at Trevor's Star. Again, similar to what Leonidas and his 300 enjoyed at Thermopylae. It's difficult to flank, attack from the rear or cut off supply lines.
When the first MWJ were discovered, the League should have been cautious,
strategically, because of what tactical advantages such junctions could infer. Moreover, they
should have had the foresight that perhaps other wormholes may be present in the sector and setting a precedent in collecting them early on would kill the worry that said junctions would someday supply a direct prong of attack to areas inside the League. Moreover, the SLN should have foreseen, for anyone having read the Art of War, the strategic advantage of nullifying one's benefit of the interior position and claiming it for oneself.
Because they couldn't risk any upstarts thinking it enough of an advantage that they could come calling one day. And they had NO way of knowing where the MWJ would lead or any future junctions.
I keep preaching 'til I'm blue in the face, that having the advantage of interior position can be devastating. One should learn that from the chess board (or similarly controlling the Mason Dixon line on the checkerboard with flying Kings). All generals and admirals play chess I'd think.
So, in summary, seizing any junctions would have set a precedent early on. Nipped any future potential tactical advantages in the bud. Nullified any interior positions thus protecting the SLNs rear areas. Denied any direct prongs of attack. And... claiming the tactical advantage for oneself would have kept the grinding boot on any upstart neobarbs or rebellious member states.
Securing all discovered wormholes would have fallen under the umbrella of very prudent 'preventive measures.'Aside:
Also I'll blame it on that baggage again that I carry from other sources. Namely here, Stargate. Earth couldn't risk NOT surveying any and all Stargates because they didn't know where they would ultimately lead to, or lead
from.It's not like Earth to fail to see potential military value out of something. Worlds would grow. Sectors would grow. Navies would grow. Down the line the MWJ could potentially bite one on, and in, the ass.
I submit their current dilemma as exhibit A.
.