Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 11 guests

Machine Guns in Safehold

This fascinating series is a combination of historical seafaring, swashbuckling adventure, and high technological science-fiction. Join us in a discussion!
Re: Machine Guns in Safehold
Post by Castenea   » Mon Nov 23, 2015 6:25 pm

Castenea
Captain of the List

Posts: 671
Joined: Mon Apr 09, 2012 5:21 pm
Location: MD

Relax wrote:You are forgetting something rather important.

War, before the 20th century, only happened half of the year. And it was not until the middle(partial) to END of the 20th century that it was even contemplated otherwise.

Why? Food preservation. Disease. Shelter/warmth. And then ultimately, transportation through miles of thick deep mud. A hard to build railroad requiring hundreds of thousands of willing people is not realistic. Besides a RR will not help the above realities of war's aspects. Takes too much time, and the front moves too quickly for fixed transportation assets.

Even WWI was not a war during the winter. Pretty much everyone sat and survived. Why they could actually BUILD a RR to the front. The Front DID NOT MOVE and HAD not moved for years. No major offensives happened. Neither was WWII a war in the winter. Only on the best of days did anything happen by and large and that essentially consisted of airplanes flying. Ground troops on the eastern front did not move. In dead of winter, yes, but only short distances and very rarely due to one side being winter clothing equipped and other side NOT equipped as the ground was frozen. Do the Charis forces have winter gear and winter knowledge on how to survive? HELL NO! During WWII Spring offensives? Partially, but not really until LATE spring.

Charis and its allies have not solved the above problems making war possible outside of the normal 6months of the year time frame yet. It requires TRUCKS with BIG TIRES and and Internal Combustion Engines to make war remotely possible in non optimal months.

A railroad solves none of these basic realities of war's required logistics.

Therefore those canals are perfectly viable solutions for conquest avenues. They are the only viable solution.

Unless you are going to claim that there will be a stalemate... As if MWW is going to write the series into a stalemate like the Great War was. :roll:

Three problems, 1) we have text ev that at least elite Chisholmian troops are trained and equipped for winter fighting. 2)Winter war fare was conducted by some long before the 20th century, look up the siege of Boston and the battle of Trenton some time. The British army detested that the US was tardy to go into winter quarters and early to leave them. 3) How is building a RR slower than building a canal?

The fighting is leaving the canal network in shambles in the area where the fighting is taking place. I would expect that in any area where there is a civilian population available to repair the canals as fast as they have spare man power to do so. These people will be repairing the canal for their own reasons (crops to market, finished goods from production centers) and in doing so make the military logistics much easier. Much the same happened in France in 1944-45 with their rail network.
Top
Re: Machine Guns in Safehold
Post by n7axw   » Mon Nov 23, 2015 7:14 pm

n7axw
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5997
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 8:54 pm
Location: Viborg, SD

evilauthor wrote:Yeah. There's not much point in putting an ammo manufactury in Tarot if all the ingredients have to be shipped there before Tarot can make ammo. If anything, you'd be lengthening the time it takes ammo to reach the soldiers who need it because the route from raw resource to finished product is being artificially lengthened by putting the ammo plant in such an out of the way place.

Also, I was under the impression that railroads would be used primarily for EoC's internal infrastructure improvement before being built in places outside the EoC.


I know that railroads are useful, but there won't be any in time for the current war. You guys tend to forget how stressed the EOC's industrial base has been to simply supply the weapons needed by the armies in Siddarmark to say nothing if coming up with the steel for the ironclads. Rail will be primarily a peacetime project.

The second thing I wanted to note here in response to posts upstream in this thread is Chishlom now has a manufacturing plant producing modern rifles and ammumition. Listening to Howsmyn's ruminations, he has plans to locate the bulk of ammumition production in Emerald which I understand to be a project underway. Also Siddarmark is well underway to having a manufacturing plant to produce modern rifles.

To summarize, efforts are being made toward dispersing Old Charis' industrial plant so that it won't be so concentrated in one place.

Don

-
When any group seeks political power in God's name, both religion and politics are instantly corrupted.
Top
Re: Machine Guns in Safehold
Post by JeffEngel   » Mon Nov 23, 2015 7:32 pm

JeffEngel
Admiral

Posts: 2074
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2014 6:06 pm

n7axw wrote:I know that railroads are useful, but there won't be any in time for the current war. You guys tend to forget how stressed the EOC's industrial base has been to simply supply the weapons needed by the armies in Siddarmark to say nothing if coming up with the steel for the ironclads. Rail will be primarily a peacetime project.
Yeah, they need a lot more iron production before railroads are going to see extensive use. Right now, it's more a matter of "hey, look at this - start planning on the basis of these running around in the next 10-15 years." And that's a fine and important message for Chisholmian nobles who want to make too much trouble on the basis of their control of canal routes.

If they can work out places where a short rail line would make a profound difference, they'll be on to something for an early application. Slapping railroads all over Haven to lug machine gun ammunition to the front is very much not one of those.
The second thing I wanted to note here in response to posts upstream in this thread is Chishlom now has a manufacturing plant producing modern rifles and ammumition. Listening to Howsmyn's ruminations, he has plans to locate the bulk of ammumition production in Emerald which I understand to be a project underway. Also Siddarmark is well underway to having a manufacturing plant to produce modern rifles.

To summarize, efforts are being made toward dispersing Old Charis' industrial plant so that it won't be so concentrated in one place.

Don


Yup, that's a big part of it. They don't want any industrial accidents or Rakurai (Clyntahn's, not the OBS!) strikes doing more damage than they can prevent. Beyond that though, there are the social and political points. People who have industry around, own it, or work in it, will start having an interest in it or at least a tolerant familiarity. It can't then be "the accursed products of Demonic Delthak". Politically, it's a tangible measure of the Empire as a partnership among component parts, which can go a long way among the Empire's junior parts (Tarot, Emerald, Zebediah) and the restive larger ones (Chisholm [well - inside Chisholm's castles at least], Corisande).
Top
Re: Machine Guns in Safehold
Post by Weird Harold   » Mon Nov 23, 2015 7:56 pm

Weird Harold
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4478
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2014 10:25 pm
Location: "Lost Wages", NV

CRC wrote:To go semi-auto or full auto they are going to have to change cartridges completely to a smaller size.


IIRC, Charisian revolvers are roughly equivalent to .45 Long Colt revolvers of 1880 US Westerns fame. That cartridge is suitable for an AK clone or Thompson SMG derivative. The ICN apparently issues a smaller caliber pistol and that cartridge could be adapted to a submachine gun similar to the Sten or Schmeizer(sp) (WWII "grease guns" in .45ACP or 9mm Parabellum)

Charis probably has the capability to produce a Colt M1911A1 clone, but probably won't until after the current war is done to reduce the number of different calibers in use.
.
.
.
Answers! I got lots of answers!

(Now if I could just find the right questions.)
Top
Re: Machine Guns in Safehold
Post by Relax   » Mon Nov 23, 2015 8:28 pm

Relax
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 3214
Joined: Tue Oct 27, 2009 7:18 pm

Castenea wrote:
Relax wrote:You are forgetting something rather important.

War, before the 20th century, only happened half of the year. And it was not until the middle(partial) to END of the 20th century that it was even contemplated otherwise.

Therefore those canals are perfectly viable solutions for conquest avenues. They are the only viable solution.

Three problems, 1) we have text ev that at least elite Chisholmian troops are trained and equipped for winter fighting. 2)Winter war fare was conducted by some long before the 20th century, look up the siege of Boston and the battle of Trenton some time. The British army detested that the US was tardy to go into winter quarters and early to leave them. 3) How is building a RR slower than building a canal?

The fighting is leaving the canal network in shambles in the area where the fighting is taking place. I would expect that in any area where there is a civilian population available to repair the canals as fast as they have spare man power to do so. These people will be repairing the canal for their own reasons (crops to market, finished goods from production centers) and in doing so make the military logistics much easier. Much the same happened in France in 1944-45 with their rail network.


So, if a minor part of your army has a winter coat this now equals the ability for your entire army without said training to magically obtain winter gear and also widespread winter transportation logistics to supply an army... :roll:

And 2, appears you never read what I wrote. Never said Never. Did say rarely and only in very limited fashion. Might have noticed, both instances you and I depicted were both during hard freezes allowing for ease in transportation.... yea that word again. Transportation.

Canal networks a mess? Clean em. Far easier to clean and repair than to build from scratch.
_________
Tally Ho!
Relax
Top
Re: Machine Guns in Safehold
Post by BobG   » Mon Nov 23, 2015 10:44 pm

BobG
Captain (Junior Grade)

Posts: 288
Joined: Sat Aug 08, 2009 5:23 pm
Location: Westford, MA

n7axw wrote:I know that railroads are useful, but there won't be any in time for the current war. You guys tend to forget how stressed the EOC's industrial base has been to simply supply the weapons needed by the armies in Siddarmark to say nothing if coming up with the steel for the ironclads. Rail will be primarily a peacetime project.

The second thing I wanted to note here in response to posts upstream in this thread is Chishlom now has a manufacturing plant producing modern rifles and ammumition. Listening to Howsmyn's ruminations, he has plans to locate the bulk of ammumition production in Emerald which I understand to be a project underway. Also Siddarmark is well underway to having a manufacturing plant to produce modern rifles.

To summarize, efforts are being made toward dispersing Old Charis' industrial plant so that it won't be so concentrated in one place.

Don
-

What about traction engines (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traction_engine)? They were almost as large as a diesel cab, and while they were slow, they were powerful. I could see a traction engine pulling a train of cargo wagons or even barges, moving along at 10 mph, and even towing along the ice in winter. No where near as fast as a train, but they wouldn't require tracks. They would be a reliable means of moving supplies, and could even plow the roads as well.

I am not suggesting they could replace the canals, but they could augment them in the summer, and provide relatively reliable transport in the winter.

A different point: while the amount of steel required still seems almost impossible to provide for rails to the front in Siddermark, they have by far enough people from surrendered troops to actually build the tracks.

-- Bob G


-- Bob G
SF & Fantasy: The only things better than Chocolate.
Top
Re: Machine Guns in Safehold
Post by Weird Harold   » Mon Nov 23, 2015 11:32 pm

Weird Harold
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4478
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2014 10:25 pm
Location: "Lost Wages", NV

BobG wrote:What about traction engines (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traction_engine)? They were almost as large as a diesel cab, and while they were slow, they were powerful. I could see a traction engine pulling a train of cargo wagons or even barges, moving along at 10 mph, and even towing along the ice in winter. No where near as fast as a train, but they wouldn't require tracks. They would be a reliable means of moving supplies, and could even plow the roads as well.


Traction engines are certainly a possibility, but so are Steam Trucks/Lorries -- steam powered versions of the 2.5 ton trucks of the Red Ball express in WWII.

Almost everything in the present world can be duplicated with steam power instead of internal combustion engines -- even steam airplanes


Limited range before needing fuel and water would be the limiting factors.
.
.
.
Answers! I got lots of answers!

(Now if I could just find the right questions.)
Top
Re: Machine Guns in Safehold
Post by n7axw   » Mon Nov 23, 2015 11:34 pm

n7axw
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 5997
Joined: Wed Jan 22, 2014 8:54 pm
Location: Viborg, SD

BobG wrote:
n7axw wrote:I know that railroads are useful, but there won't be any in time for the current war. You guys tend to forget how stressed the EOC's industrial base has been to simply supply the weapons needed by the armies in Siddarmark to say nothing if coming up with the steel for the ironclads. Rail will be primarily a peacetime project.

The second thing I wanted to note here in response to posts upstream in this thread is Chishlom now has a manufacturing plant producing modern rifles and ammumition. Listening to Howsmyn's ruminations, he has plans to locate the bulk of ammumition production in Emerald which I understand to be a project underway. Also Siddarmark is well underway to having a manufacturing plant to produce modern rifles.

To summarize, efforts are being made toward dispersing Old Charis' industrial plant so that it won't be so concentrated in one place.

Don
-

What about traction engines (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traction_engine)? They were almost as large as a diesel cab, and while they were slow, they were powerful. I could see a traction engine pulling a train of cargo wagons or even barges, moving along at 10 mph, and even towing along the ice in winter. No where near as fast as a train, but they wouldn't require tracks. They would be a reliable means of moving supplies, and could even plow the roads as well.

I am not suggesting they could replace the canals, but they could augment them in the summer, and provide relatively reliable transport in the winter.

A different point: while the amount of steel required still seems almost impossible to provide for rails to the front in Siddermark, they have by far enough people from surrendered troops to actually build the tracks.

-- Bob G


-- Bob G


Again, the question comes down to allocation of resourses. You have to ask not only if the proposal is worth while. This one sounds great...eventually. But is it crucial for the alliance to do something like this in the midst of a war when every effort is being made and resourses strained to get weapons in the hands of the troops? Consider...rather than having the completely modern rifles, the RSA still is using about 2/3 muzzle loaders, many of them courtesy of defeated Desnairian, Dohlaran and AOG armies on the theory that some rifle is better than no rifle. Or again, consider the shortage of ironclads at a moment when everybody's shells are blowing holes through outdated galleons. Or remember that Hanth's troops have yet to be updated to the M96's or that the limits on standing up new regiments is not manpower, but weapons availability.

So the question about how crucial it is has to be spelled out in terms of mobility. And the reality is that allied armies are already vastly more mobil and agile than their opponents, the outstanding example of which would be BGV's winter march to Five Forks.

So, at least in my view, this idea is not crucial at this time, something to be put on the back burner until more urgent needs are met, something I don't see happening in this war.

Don

-
When any group seeks political power in God's name, both religion and politics are instantly corrupted.
Top
Re: Machine Guns in Safehold
Post by JeffEngel   » Tue Nov 24, 2015 7:40 am

JeffEngel
Admiral

Posts: 2074
Joined: Mon Aug 11, 2014 6:06 pm

n7axw wrote:Again, the question comes down to allocation of resourses. You have to ask not only if the proposal is worth while. This one sounds great...eventually. But is it crucial for the alliance to do something like this in the midst of a war when every effort is being made and resourses strained to get weapons in the hands of the troops? Consider...rather than having the completely modern rifles, the RSA still is using about 2/3 muzzle loaders, many of them courtesy of defeated Desnairian, Dohlaran and AOG armies on the theory that some rifle is better than no rifle. Or again, consider the shortage of ironclads at a moment when everybody's shells are blowing holes through outdated galleons. Or remember that Hanth's troops have yet to be updated to the M96's or that the limits on standing up new regiments is not manpower, but weapons availability.

For that matter, the steam engines that are in notoriously limited quantity would be sucked up by railroad locomotives, quite apart from the iron for tracks or chemicals for ammunition spewed out like horizontal lead rain.

I'd expect a lot of the steam engines to get sucked up into mining applications to help feed the ore demand - iron, copper, tin, silver, gold - and for early railroad lines to run in and around mines. Where practical, muscle power can be made to do the work instead of locomotives - dragons are mightily impressive draft animals.
Top
Re: Machine Guns in Safehold
Post by Weird Harold   » Tue Nov 24, 2015 8:11 am

Weird Harold
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4478
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2014 10:25 pm
Location: "Lost Wages", NV

JeffEngel wrote:For that matter, the steam engines that are in notoriously limited quantity would be sucked up by railroad locomotives, quite apart from the iron for tracks or chemicals for ammunition spewed out like horizontal lead rain.


You do realize that a railroad locomotive doesn't have a steam engine, it IS a steam engine. Building railroad locomotives might compete for steel and other resources with Marine and Industrial engines, but it isn't going to be competing for steam engines.
.
.
.
Answers! I got lots of answers!

(Now if I could just find the right questions.)
Top

Return to Safehold