Relax wrote:JohnRoth wrote:"Metamaterials" are a thing, right now and in real life. They do things that everything we used to think were cast in concrete would call impossible, like a negative index of refraction. After 2000 years of development? Who knows?
My statement had nothing to do with his metamaterials statement.
Had everything to do with being able to negate Irradiation due to heat. Something no one has seen in a lab or even theorized. Pure fiction currently. The ultimate handwavium. He added 0.5 + 0 to get 2.
Then explain to me what thermal radiation IS. What IS IT?
It's an electromagnetic wave, particularly at the infrared wavelength at the temperatures we're used to (less than 1000 kelvin). Which means that you CAN deflect, refract, and reflect it (otherwise mirrors wouldn't reflect heat, and magnifying glasses wouldn't burn ants).
"So I'd go with programmable metamaterials able to generate interference patterns against the radiation, and bend it away from known observers."
I'm not talking about negating it, although I can see how "generate interference patterns against the radiation" might suggest that. In optics, particularly non-linear optics, interference does not necessarily mean negation. I'm talking about sending it somewhere where any fancy sensors aren't emplaced to see it in the first place, without having to worry about the attitude of the craft. And out of all of that, the only two things I believe we can't do right now is to affect such a wide range of wavelengths and program direction on the fly. Hopefully 2000 years isn't too short a time to manage that.
Before dismissing something as handwavium, at least Google and look it up on Wikipedia or something.