Topic Actions

Topic Search

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 20 guests

Machine Guns in Safehold

This fascinating series is a combination of historical seafaring, swashbuckling adventure, and high technological science-fiction. Join us in a discussion!
Re: Machine Guns in Safehold
Post by dan92677   » Sat Nov 21, 2015 7:13 pm

dan92677
Commander

Posts: 218
Joined: Thu Apr 18, 2013 10:33 pm
Location: Southern California

Think how the enemy would react to a battery of 3 or 4 round per second explosive shelled hand cranked cannons, say 20 or 30mm (1 inch)!

Dan Jones
Top
Re: Machine Guns in Safehold
Post by Duck6actual   » Sat Nov 21, 2015 8:18 pm

Duck6actual
Midshipman

Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2015 11:47 pm

thinkstoomuch wrote:
Theemile wrote:Actually, light rail/tac rail would probably make more sense at this point than automobiles, yes it would be terrain limited, but closer to the technological limits of Safehold. Rail lines would probably start by paralleling the canals(because they are already cleared and graded), multiplying their utility and allowing heavy winter transport, then branching out from there as possible.


Railroads eat steel or iron. Not my area of speciality but I'll give it a shot.

It has been a while since I read up on it the Grantville Gazette so all these figures are off the cuff.

Say you use 5 pound rail(for tacrail, SWAG). Full size started ~40 pound. That is 5 pounds to the yard. You need 2 rails (technically not really) so in one mile you need 1,760 pounds of steel/iron. Or roughly 1 ton to the mile. Remember this is off the cuff. Might be off by an order of magnitude or even more. Probably higher.

What was the tonnage of the King Herald VII again? How far will that get me? :twisted:

I guess you could go with strap rails, just don't ask me to ride it. References in GG21 is strap rail for a full size line was 15 pounds to a yard.

While it is in their technical capability the production side is problematic.


One other thing on trucks, all those wonderful instructions on how to make roads in the Writ. If you go to rubber tires, even hard rubber, Throw them away. 20-30 miles an hour there will be no road in a short time of intense military use.

Of course it could be an odd way to break the Writ now that I think about it. :D

Have fun,
T2M

Some early rail roads used wooden rails, not as efficient or durable as metal but when you need to lay track quickly and only need it for a short period then wood becomes a viable material
Top
Re: Machine Guns in Safehold
Post by Weird Harold   » Sat Nov 21, 2015 10:32 pm

Weird Harold
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4478
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2014 10:25 pm
Location: "Lost Wages", NV

Duck6actual wrote:Some early rail roads used wooden rails, not as efficient or durable as metal but when you need to lay track quickly and only need it for a short period then wood becomes a viable material


Very few early railroads used 4-6-0 high-pressure Locomotives, though. The "automotive" described in HFQ would destroy wooden rails before it completed its first passage-- and that's just the engine described, an actual train wouldn't make out of the marshaling yard on wooden rails.
.
.
.
Answers! I got lots of answers!

(Now if I could just find the right questions.)
Top
Re: Machine Guns in Safehold
Post by Duck6actual   » Sat Nov 21, 2015 10:58 pm

Duck6actual
Midshipman

Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2015 11:47 pm

dan92677 wrote:Think how the enemy would react to a battery of 3 or 4 round per second explosive shelled hand cranked cannons, say 20 or 30mm (1 inch)!

Dan Jones

That's what I was talking about a hand cranked 25mm Bushmaster or you could do this with springs and pneumatic pressure a 40mm Bofors
Top
Re: Machine Guns in Safehold
Post by evilauthor   » Sat Nov 21, 2015 11:39 pm

evilauthor
Captain of the List

Posts: 724
Joined: Mon Jul 21, 2014 8:51 pm

enutt wrote:I'm not sure I agree with all your points, but I've seen the logistics discussion previously, and it does have some merit based upon the details in the book. What doesn't make sense is why ammo production is centered in Old Charis. Ideally, it should be moved, at least in part, to Siddarmark as this would shorten the supply line as well as provide an increase in manufacturing capacity. Arguably, foundries in Siddarmark could get repurposed to ammunition production faster than to rifle or artillery production as the materials, equipment, and processes are easier.


It's centered in Old Charis because that was where the stuff was developed. It takes TIME and material to build ammo factories and the tools that go in them you know.

And Siddarmark's still busy upgrading to last year's tech base.

Point 2 is possibly valid, however the Inner Circle has access to Terran archives that would suggest the use of automatic weapons. Merlin certainly knows the historically important role that crew-served automatic weaponry has played in every war since the 1880's.


Those same archives will also tell you that Artillery is King of the Battlefield when it comes to killing troops. That phrase was still in use when I was in the Army a decade ago. And Charis is comspicuously NOT lacking in Artillery... except of course for the field commanders always wanting more.

Point 3 may be accurate under certain conditions, but artillery loses effectiveness in the point-defense role, in close terrain (i.e. the Kyplynger Forest, cities), or when weather conditions do not permit spotting. It also lacks mobility when on the advance (with the notable exception of the infantry "angle guns" aka mortars being used by the ICA. In fact, it's effectiveness to date has been either on the defense (Thesmar, Sylman Gap) or against fixed enemy emplacements when on the attack, and always against massed infantry. Once the ICA faces the MHOGAA in open terrain using the new rifles and adopting the dispersed infantry doctrine, artillery is going to be far less effective.


Um, if the Might Host is attacking over open terrain en masse, that's IDEAL for artillery to kill them.

Also, I don't know if you missed it, but the Allied Armies have fought very few running battles. It's always defending a fixed position or attacking a fixed position. Which you just cited is what artillery is best at.

The only times the Allies fight running battles is when the other side is running AWAY.

I hope you don't think someone likes say... Green Valley (who has SNARC recon) is going to be stupid enough to fight a running open field battle against a numerically superior and unbroken army if he can help it.
Top
Re: Machine Guns in Safehold
Post by saber964   » Sun Nov 22, 2015 2:14 pm

saber964
Admiral

Posts: 2423
Joined: Thu Dec 13, 2012 8:41 pm
Location: Spokane WA USA

Weird Harold wrote:
Duck6actual wrote:Some early rail roads used wooden rails, not as efficient or durable as metal but when you need to lay track quickly and only need it for a short period then wood becomes a viable material


Very few early railroads used 4-6-0 high-pressure Locomotives, though. The "automotive" described in HFQ would destroy wooden rails before it completed its first passage-- and that's just the engine described, an actual train wouldn't make out of the marshaling yard on wooden rails.



Actually some early RR used wooden rails covered by steel straps screwed or nailed into the wooden rails called strap rails. They had the major problem of the strap s coming loose and flying free and usually going up through the floor of any rail car and would frequently impale passengers. These were called snake heads or steel snakes.
Top
Re: Machine Guns in Safehold
Post by Weird Harold   » Sun Nov 22, 2015 3:22 pm

Weird Harold
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4478
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2014 10:25 pm
Location: "Lost Wages", NV

saber964 wrote:Actually some early RR used wooden rails covered by steel straps ...


Yes, I'm aware of strap-rail, but my point was that Safehold's very first steam "automotive" is already too big for wood or strap-rail to be useful. Even wrought-iron rails won't hold up very long to the weight of locomotive that Safehold is starting with; they've completely skipped over 90% of "early railroads."
.
.
.
Answers! I got lots of answers!

(Now if I could just find the right questions.)
Top
Re: Machine Guns in Safehold
Post by Duck6actual   » Sun Nov 22, 2015 3:45 pm

Duck6actual
Midshipman

Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2015 11:47 pm

Weird Harold wrote:
saber964 wrote:Actually some early RR used wooden rails covered by steel straps ...


Yes, I'm aware of strap-rail, but my point was that Safehold's very first steam "automotive" is already too big for wood or strap-rail to be useful. Even wrought-iron rails won't hold up very long to the weight of locomotive that Safehold is starting with; they've completely skipped over 90% of "early railroads."


But for a tac rail the engine doesn't have to be as big, probably better if it didn't do you wouldn't have to stock so much coal
Top
Re: Machine Guns in Safehold
Post by Weird Harold   » Sun Nov 22, 2015 7:58 pm

Weird Harold
Fleet Admiral

Posts: 4478
Joined: Thu Apr 24, 2014 10:25 pm
Location: "Lost Wages", NV

Duck6actual wrote:But for a tac rail the engine doesn't have to be as big, probably better if it didn't do you wouldn't have to stock so much coal


True, but Charis shows no sign of using Tac-rail. The only "Automotive" in textev is:

Hell's Foundations Quiver
MARCH
YEAR OF GOD 897

.IX.
The Delthak Works, Barony of High Rock, Kingdom of Old Charis, Charisian Empire wrote:

For all its size, it had a curiously unfinished—or perhaps the word he wanted was “crude”—appearance compared to the imagery of last-generation steam locomotives from Old Earth with which Owl had provided him. By the same token, though, it looked far sleeker and much more sophisticated than its early-nineteenth-century predecessors ever had. It was built in what would have been called a 2-4-0 configuration back on Old Earth, with a two-wheeled front bogey followed by two paired drive wheels powered by two twenty-one-inch-diameter drive cylinders with a thirty-inch stroke. Unlike the marine engines which were Praigyr’s first true love, the automotive used a fire tube arrangement, with the hot gases from the furnace carried through a water-filled boiler. It was, however, designed to run at rather higher pressure and temperature than most Old Earth locomotives prior to the twentieth century, and it incorporated both a superheater (tubes in which boiler steam passed through the hot furnace gasses in front of the boiler proper, which further heated it to produce “dry steam” for the cylinders) and a blast pipe using waste steam to boost the firebox draught to increase its efficiency. The superheater had been one of Praigyr’s ideas, based on his work with the marine engines, but the blast pipe had been Howsmyn’s suggestion, based on input from Owl and Doctor Dahnel Vyrnyr’s suggestions. There was enormous room for improvement in the efficiency of both, since Vyrnyr’s development of pressure dynamics was still at a very early stage, and there were still a few problems with the poppet valves which admitted steam to the cylinders. Despite that, the current design would produce about sixty-one dragonpower (over fifteen hundred Old Earth horsepower) by Owl’s calculations and was probably already on a par with those of the last two decades or so of the nineteenth century.
.
.
.
Answers! I got lots of answers!

(Now if I could just find the right questions.)
Top
Re: Machine Guns in Safehold
Post by Duck6actual   » Sun Nov 22, 2015 10:20 pm

Duck6actual
Midshipman

Posts: 6
Joined: Thu Nov 19, 2015 11:47 pm

Weird Harold wrote:
True, but Charis shows no sign of using Tac-rail. The only "Automotive" in textev is:

Hell's Foundations Quiver
MARCH
YEAR OF GOD 897

.IX.
The Delthak Works, Barony of High Rock, Kingdom of Old Charis, Charisian Empire wrote:

For all its size, it had a curiously unfinished—or perhaps the word he wanted was “crude”—appearance compared to the imagery of last-generation steam locomotives from Old Earth with which Owl had provided him. By the same token, though, it looked far sleeker and much more sophisticated than its early-nineteenth-century predecessors ever had. It was built in what would have been called a 2-4-0 configuration back on Old Earth, with a two-wheeled front bogey followed by two paired drive wheels powered by two twenty-one-inch-diameter drive cylinders with a thirty-inch stroke. Unlike the marine engines which were Praigyr’s first true love, the automotive used a fire tube arrangement, with the hot gases from the furnace carried through a water-filled boiler. It was, however, designed to run at rather higher pressure and temperature than most Old Earth locomotives prior to the twentieth century, and it incorporated both a superheater (tubes in which boiler steam passed through the hot furnace gasses in front of the boiler proper, which further heated it to produce “dry steam” for the cylinders) and a blast pipe using waste steam to boost the firebox draught to increase its efficiency. The superheater had been one of Praigyr’s ideas, based on his work with the marine engines, but the blast pipe had been Howsmyn’s suggestion, based on input from Owl and Doctor Dahnel Vyrnyr’s suggestions. There was enormous room for improvement in the efficiency of both, since Vyrnyr’s development of pressure dynamics was still at a very early stage, and there were still a few problems with the poppet valves which admitted steam to the cylinders. Despite that, the current design would produce about sixty-one dragonpower (over fifteen hundred Old Earth horsepower) by Owl’s calculations and was probably already on a par with those of the last two decades or so of the nineteenth century.


But once you have a proof of concept (which is what it was) it would be easy for Charis to produce small cheap engines for forward logistically support
Top

Return to Safehold